Bromocriptine/levodopa combined versus levodopa alone forearly Parkinson's disease

被引:5
|
作者
van Hilten, J. J.
Ramaker, C. C.
Stowe, R. L.
Ives, N. J.
机构
[1] Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2300 RC
关键词
antiparkinson agents [* therapeutic use; bromocriptine [* therapeutic use; combined modality therapy; levodopa [* therapeutic use; parkinson disease [* drug therapy; randomized controlled trials; humans;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD003634.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Drugs that mimic dopamine, such as bromocriptine (BR), were introduced as monotherapy or in combination with levodopa (LD) in the hope that this approach would prevent or delay the onset of motor complications in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, hitherto, the role of BR has remained controversial. We present a systematic review of all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of BR/LD combination therapy compared with LD monotherapy in PD. Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of BR/LD combination therapy in delaying the onset of motor complications associated with LD monotherapy in patients with PD. Search strategy We searched theMovement Disorders Group trials register which includes MEDLINE and EMBASE; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); handsearched appropriate neurology journals, symposia reports, PD handbooks and reference lists of reviews found by the search-strategy. We also contacted Sandoz -now Novartis- ( manufacturer of BR) and PPD Pharmaco and contacted colleagues who had co-ordinated trials on BR. Selection criteria RCTs were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated the efficacy of BR/LD combination therapy for delaying the onset of motor complications compared with LD monotherapy in patients with PD. Outcome measures evaluated included the occurrence and severity of motor complications, impairment and disability scores, side effects and dropouts. Data collection and analysis To determine the feasibility of a quantitative systematic review two independent reviewers evaluated the methodological quality of identified trials and extracted data from the trials. Main results The methodological quality of seven trials showed important shortcomings. All studies failed adequately to describe randomisation procedures. Only three were carried out according to a double-blind design. Differences were found between studies concerning the mean age of the participants, the BR titration phase, the maximum achieved daily dose of LD (62.5 to 1000 mg) and BR ( 5 to 50 mg), and the applied outcomes. Our results show no evidence of consistent differences between treatment groups concerning the occurrence and severity of motor complications, scores of impairment and disability, or the occurrence of side effects. Authors' conclusions This systematic review revealed no evidence to support the use of early BR/LD combination therapy as a strategy to prevent or delay the onset of motor complications in the treatment of PD.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost analysis of ropinirole versus levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease
    Iskedjian, M
    Einarson, TR
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2003, 21 (02) : 115 - 127
  • [32] Double-Blind Trial of Levodopa/Carbidopa/Entacapone Versus Levodopa/Carbidopa in Early Parkinson's Disease
    Hauser, Robert A.
    Panisset, Michel
    Abbruzzese, Giovanni
    Mancione, Linda
    Dronamraju, Nalina
    Kakarieka, Algirdas
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2009, 24 (04) : 541 - 550
  • [33] Ropinirole versus pramipexole as adjunctive therapy to levodopa in Parkinson's disease
    Barbato, L
    Cattaneo, C
    Monge, A
    Nordera, G
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2002, 17 : S49 - S49
  • [34] Ropinirole versus pergolide as adjunctive therapy to levodopa in Parkinson's disease
    Unal, Z
    Boylu, E
    Orhan, S
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2004, 19 : S278 - S278
  • [35] Adherence with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone versus levodopa/carbidopa and entacapone as separate tablets in patients with Parkinson's disease
    Delea, Thomas E.
    Thomas, Simu K.
    Hagiwara, May
    Mancione, L.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2010, 26 (07) : 1543 - 1552
  • [36] Cost Analysis of Ropinirole versus Levodopa in the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease
    Michael Iskedjian
    Thomas R. Einarson
    PharmacoEconomics, 2003, 21 : 115 - 127
  • [37] Levodopa/carbidopa versus levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone as a predictive factor for the development of motor complications in Parkinson's disease
    Olanow, C. W.
    Kieburtz, K.
    Rascol, O.
    Poewe, W.
    Schapira, A.
    Nissinen, H.
    Leinonen, M.
    Stocchi, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2012, 19 : 658 - 658
  • [38] COMBINED BROMOCRIPTINE-LEVODOPA THERAPY EARLY IN PARKINSONS-DISEASE
    RINNE, UK
    NEUROLOGY, 1985, 35 (08) : 1196 - 1198
  • [39] COMPARISON OF DOPA DECARBOXYLASE INHIBITOR (CARBIDOPA) COMBINED WITH LEVODOPA AND LEVODOPA ALONE IN PARKINSONS-DISEASE
    LIEBERMAN, A
    GOODGOLD, A
    JONAS, S
    LEIBOWITZ, M
    NEUROLOGY, 1975, 25 (10) : 911 - 916
  • [40] BROMOCRIPTINE VERSUS PLACEBO IN LEVODOPA TREATED PATIENTS WITH PARKINSONS-DISEASE
    GRON, U
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1977, 56 (03): : 269 - 273