Real-life treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with regorafenib: a single-centre review

被引:11
|
作者
Gotfrit, J. [1 ]
Vickers, M. [1 ,2 ]
Sud, S. [1 ]
Asmis, T. [1 ,2 ]
Cripps, C. [1 ,2 ]
Goel, R. [1 ,2 ]
Hsu, T. [1 ,2 ]
Jonker, D. [1 ,2 ]
Goodwin, R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Div Med Oncol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Metastatic colorectal cancer; regorafenib; systemic therapy; real-world settings; PHASE-3; TRIAL; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.3747/co.24.3562
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Various tyrosine kinase signalling pathways affect the development and progression of colorectal cancer (CRC). In clinical trials, regorafenib has been associated with a survival benefit in metastatic CRC (mCRC). We assessed the safety and efficacy of regorafenib in real-world patients. Methods In a retrospective review of patients with mCRC treated with regorafenib at our institution from 2013 to 2015, patient demographics, treatment, and survival data were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (os) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results In total, 48 patients were offered regorafenib, and 35 (73%) started treatment. Of the patients who started regorafenib, 57% were men. Median age in the cohort was 61 years, and all patients had a performance status in the range 0-2. Time from diagnosis of mCRC to regorafenib treatment was more than 18 months in 71% of patients. Starting dose was 160 mg in 54% of the patients, 120 mg in 40%, and 80 mg in 6%. Dose reductions occurred in 34% of the patients, and interruptions, in 29%. Best response was progressive disease (60%) and stable disease (17%); response in the rest of the patients was unknown. The most common adverse events on regorafenib (any grade) were fatigue (57%), hyperbilirubinemia (43%), thrombocytopenia (37%), anorexia (31%), and hypertension (31%). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were fatigue (29%), hypophosphatemia (17%), weight loss (11%), and hyperbilirubinemia (9%). Common reasons for discontinuing regorafenib included progressive disease (51%) and toxicity (26%). In patients treated with regorafenib, PFS was 2.4 months (95% confidence interval: 1.8 to 3.3 months) and os was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval: 3.7 to 8.9 months). No factors were associated with survival in univariate or multivariate analysis. Conclusions In a real-world setting, regorafenib is associated with survival similar to that reported in the randomized controlled trials, but at the expense of toxicity leading to discontinuation in many patients. Future studies of regorafenib should focus on identifying the patients most likely to benefit and on minimizing toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 239
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The role of regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Riechelmann, Rachel
    Grothey, Axel
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (06): : 596 - 597
  • [42] Safety and tolerability of regorafenib: a real-life experience
    Youssif Abo Elseud
    Amrou Shaaban
    Asit Mohanty
    Jasem Albarrak
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, 2022, 53 : 187 - 191
  • [43] Safety and tolerability of regorafenib: a real-life experience
    Elseud, Youssif Abo
    Shaaban, Amrou
    Mohanty, Asit
    Albarrak, Jasem
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER, 2022, 53 (01) : 187 - 191
  • [44] Regorafenib approved in Metastatic Colorectal cancer
    Andre, Thierry
    Dumont, Sarah N.
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2013, 100 (10) : 1027 - 1029
  • [45] Prediction of mortality in metastatic colorectal cancer in a real-life population: a multicenter explorative analysis
    Holger Rumpold
    Dora Niedersüß-Beke
    Cordula Heiler
    David Falch
    Helwig Valenting Wundsam
    Sigrid Metz-Gercek
    Gudrun Piringer
    Josef Thaler
    BMC Cancer, 20
  • [46] A retrospective study of regorafenib versus trifluridine/tipiracil efficacy in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients: Multi-institution real-life clinical data
    Vitale, P.
    Zanaletti, N.
    Lombardi, P.
    Milanesio, M.
    De Falco, V.
    Terminiello, M.
    Giunta, E.
    Vitiello, P.
    Caputo, V.
    Borrelli, C.
    Arrichiello, G.
    Poliero, L.
    Ciardiello, D.
    Napolitano, S.
    Martini, G.
    Martinelli, E.
    Famiglietti, V.
    Fenocchio, E.
    Rosello Keranen, S.
    Cervantes, A.
    Ciardiello, F.
    Troiani, T.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S152 - S152
  • [47] Prediction of mortality in metastatic colorectal cancer in a real-life population: a multicenter explorative analysis
    Rumpold, Holger
    Niedersuess-Beke, Dora
    Heiler, Cordula
    Falch, David
    Wundsam, Helwig Valenting
    Metz-Gercek, Sigrid
    Piringer, Gudrun
    Thaler, Josef
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [48] Safety and tolerability of regorafenib: A real-life experience
    Elseud, Y. Abo
    Shaaban, A.
    Mohanty, A.
    Albarrak, J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S105 - S106
  • [49] Single vs Tandem Transplant in High-Risk Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Real-Life Single-Centre Analysis
    Manieri, Valentina Maria
    More', Sonia
    Saraceni, Francesco
    Scortechini, Ilaria
    Mancini, Giorgia
    Corvatta, Laura
    Morsia, Erika
    Olivieri, Attilio
    Offidani, Massimo
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2024, 24 : S235 - S236
  • [50] Pediatric cancer care management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of the literature and a single-centre real-life experience of an Italian pediatric oncology unit
    Nigro, Olga
    Oltolini, Chiara
    Barzaghi, Federica
    Foppa, Caterina Uberti
    Cicalese, Maria Pia
    Massimino, Maura
    Schiavello, Elisabetta
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2023, : 927 - 942