Quantitative image quality evaluation for Cardiac CT reconstructions

被引:0
|
作者
Tseng, Hsin-Wu [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Jiahua [2 ]
Kupinski, Matthew A. [1 ]
Balhorn, William [2 ]
Okerlund, Darin R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Opt Sci, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] GE Healthcare, CT Engn, Waukesha, WI 53188 USA
关键词
Cardiac CT; CT; Motion Compensation; SnapShot Freeze (SSF); Image Quality;
D O I
10.1117/12.2208341
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Maintaining image quality in the presence of motion is always desirable and challenging in clinical Cardiac CT imaging. Different image-reconstruction algorithms are available on current commercial CT systems that attempt to achieve this goal. It is widely accepted that image-quality assessment should be task-based and involve specific tasks, observers, and associated figures of merits. In this work, we developed an observer model that performed the task of estimating the percentage of plaque in a vessel from CT images. We compared task performance of Cardiac CT image data reconstructed using a conventional FBP reconstruction algorithm and the SnapShot Freeze (SSF) algorithm, each at default and optimal reconstruction cardiac phases. The purpose of this work is to design an approach for quantitative image-quality evaluation of temporal resolution for Cardiac CT systems. To simulate heart motion, a moving coronary type phantom synchronized with an ECG signal was used. Three different percentage plaques embedded in a 3 mm vessel phantom were imaged multiple times under motion free, 60 bpm, and 80 bpm heart rates. Static (motion free) images of this phantom were taken as reference images for image template generation. Independent ROIs from the 60 bpm and 80 bpm images were generated by vessel tracking. The observer performed estimation tasks using these ROIs. Ensemble mean square error (EMSE) was used as the figure of merit. Results suggest that the quality of SSF images is superior to the quality of FBP images in higher heart-rate scans.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Relationship Between CT Image Quality, Segmentation Performance, and Quantitative Image Feature Analysis
    Lee, J.
    Nishikawa, R.
    Reiser, I.
    Boone, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3697 - 3697
  • [32] Image quality of photon-counting detector CT virtual monoenergetic and polyenergetic reconstructions for head and neck CT angiography
    Spampinato, Maria Vittoria
    Rodgers, Jeffrey
    McGill, Liam J.
    Schoepf, Uwe Joseph
    O'Doherty, Jim
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2024, 108
  • [33] Emergency cardiac CT for suspected acute coronary syndrome: Qualitative and quantitative assessment of coronary, pulmonary, and aortic image quality
    Dodd, Jonathan D.
    Kalva, Sanjeeva
    Pena, Antonio
    Bamberg, Fabien
    Shapiro, Michael D.
    Abbara, Suhny
    Cury, Ricardo C.
    Brady, Thomas J.
    Hoffmann, Udo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 191 (03) : 870 - 877
  • [34] Pelvic Beam-Hardening Artifacts in Dual-Energy CT Image Reconstructions: Occurrence and Impact on Image Quality
    Winklhofer, Sebastian
    Lambert, Jack W.
    Sun, Yuxin
    Wang, Zhen Jane
    Sun, Derek S.
    Yeh, Benjamin M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (01) : 114 - 123
  • [35] Semi-quantitative Evaluation of Image Quality in Low Dose 18F FDG PET/CT
    Kapur, S. C.
    Sinha, Arvind K.
    Sajjith, V. P.
    Teh, Donald
    Sharma, Vijay
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 42 : S344 - S344
  • [36] Quantitative Evaluation of Image Quality of Deep-Learning-Based CT Reconstruction Using Structural SIMilarity (SSIM)
    Yang, K.
    Parakh, A.
    Gupta, R.
    Kambadakone, A.
    Li, X.
    Liu, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E549 - E550
  • [37] An in-house software program for quantitative image quality evaluation of linac cone-beam CT system
    Sakaria, Kasmayanti
    Lim, S. Y.
    Zin, Hafiz M.
    18TH ASIA-OCEANIA CONGRESS OF MEDICAL PHYSICS (AOCMP) & 16TH SOUTH-EAST ASIA CONGRESS OF MEDICAL PHYSICS (SEACOMP), 2019, 1248
  • [38] A simple quantitative method to optimize and monitor pediatric CT image quality
    Goulet, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2343 - 2344
  • [39] CT Protocol Management Using Quantitative Clinical Image Quality Measurement
    Och, J.
    Yorks, P.
    Mehra, V.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3543 - 3543
  • [40] 90Y PET/CT quantitative accuracy and image quality
    Siman, Wendy
    Mawlawi, Osama
    Kappadath, Srinivas
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55