Performance analysis of vortex tube-thermoelectric system in gas stations

被引:6
|
作者
Nejad, Amir Qatarani [1 ]
Jahangiri, Ali [1 ]
Ameri, Mohammad [1 ]
Ahmadi, Gholamreza [1 ]
Dizaji, Alireza Karamzadeh [1 ]
Shahsavar, Amin [2 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Fac Mech & Energy Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Kermanshah Univ Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Kermanshah, Iran
关键词
Exergy; Multi-objective optimization; Natural gas; Thermoelectric generation; Vortex tube; TURBOEXPANDER; RECOVERY; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.seta.2022.102522
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
At natural gas pressure reducing stations, gas first enters a water bath heater to boost its temperature slightly, and after leaving the heater, it enters the throttle valve to reduce its pressure. This method has two major drawbacks, which are the consumption of natural gas in the heater and the excessive loss of exergy in the throttle valve. The pressure of natural gas can be reduced by using a vortex tube and converting it into hot and cold currents, and then generating electricity by directing these currents to thermoelectric generators (TEGs). Investigation of energy, exergy and environmental performance of the hybrid vortex tube-TEG system and optimization of its performance for the working condition of Kermanshah pressure reducing station is the subject of the present study. The cold mass fraction (CF) and efficiency of vortex tube are considered as decision variables. Moreover, annual average first-law efficiency (eta(I-TEG)), annual average second-law efficiency (eta(II-TEG)) and annual total electric power generated by the TEGs (P-out) are considered as optimization target functions. The results of genetic algorithm based three-objective optimization revealed that the specifications of the optimal system are: vortex tube efficiency = 0.36967, CF=0.95598,eta(I-TEG)=0.03442,eta(II-TEG)=0.04544, P-out=42770.58 kW and amount of CO2 mitigation per annum = 8.55 tons.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance Analysis of Thermoelectric Cooler Thermoelectric Generator System for Heat Recovery Applications
    Ionescu, Viorel
    Neagu, Anisoara Arleziana
    2022 IEEE 28TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM FOR DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY IN ELECTRONIC PACKAGING (SIITME), 2022, : 31 - 35
  • [32] Performance analysis of liquefied natural gas storage tanks in refueling stations
    Sharafian, Amir
    Herrera, Omar E.
    Merida, Walter
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 36 : 496 - 509
  • [33] Performance Analysis on CO2 Heat Pump Cycle with a Vortex Tube
    Zhao, Jiahua
    Ning, Jinghong
    2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART MATERIALS AND NANOTECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING (SMNE 2016), 2016, : 183 - 188
  • [34] Numerical Analysis on Thermohydraulic Performance of the Tube Inserted with Rectangular Winglet Vortex Generators
    Li, Yicong
    Qian, Zuoqin
    Wang, Qiang
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [35] Numerical simulation and performance analysis of heat transfer enhancement in tube by longitudinal vortex
    Li F.
    Lu G.
    Ma G.
    Zhai X.
    Yang S.
    Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal, 2021, 72 : 120 - 126
  • [36] Thermodynamic Performance Analysis of a Novel Vortex Tube Integrated Vapour Compression Cycles
    Arora, Akhilesh
    ASHRAE TRANSACTIONS 2020, VOL 126, 2020, 126 : 323 - 331
  • [37] Performance and characteristics of wood downdraft gasifier with vortex gas cleaning system
    Borisov, II
    Geletuha, GG
    Khalatov, AA
    BIOMASS FOR ENERGY AND INDUSTRY, 1998, : 1826 - 1829
  • [38] GAS SPECIES SEPARATION OF THE VORTEX TUBE WITH SIX NOZZLE-DRIVEN VORTEX
    Trinh, Ngoc Van
    Nghiem, Quan Thien Phan
    Kim, Younghyeon
    Pae, Wansung
    Yu, Sangseok
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2024 HEAT TRANSFER SUMMER CONFERENCE, HT 2024, 2024,
  • [39] Energy analysis within a vortex tube
    Xue, Yunpeng
    Arjomandi, Maziar
    Kelso, Richard
    EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE, 2014, 52 : 139 - 145
  • [40] Numerical Analysis of a Vortex Tube: A Review
    Sharma, T. Karthikeya
    Rao, G. Amba Prasad
    Murthy, K. Madhu
    ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2017, 24 (02) : 251 - 280