PM10, PM2.5 and PM1.0 -: Emissions from industrial plants -: Results from measurement programmes in Germany

被引:80
|
作者
Ehrlich, C.
Noll, G.
Kalkoff, W.-D.
Baumbach, G.
Dreiseidler, A.
机构
[1] Saxony Anhalt State Environm Protect Agcy, D-06116 Halle, Germany
[2] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Proc Engn & Power Plant Technol, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
PM10; PM2.5; PM1.0; stationary source emission; emission measurement; fine particles; cascade impactor; particle size distribution;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.059
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Emission measurement programmes were carried out at industrial plants in several regions of Germany to determine the fine dust in the waste gases; the PM10, PM2.5 and PM1.0 fractions were sampled using a cascade impactor technique. The installations tested included plants used for: combustion (brown coal, heavy fuel oil, wood), cement production, glass production, asphalt mixing, and processing plants for natural stones and sand, ceramics, metallurgy, chemical production, spray painting, wood processing/chip drying, poultry farming and waste treatment. In addition waste gas samples were taken from small-scale combustion units, like domestic stoves, firing lignite briquettes or wood. In total 303 individual measurement results were obtained during 106 different measurement campaigns. In the study it was found that in more than 70% of the individual emission measurement results from industrial plants and domestic stoves the PM1.0 portion amounted to more than 90% and the PM2.5 portion between 50% and 90% of the total PM (particulate matter) emission. For thermal industrial processes the PM1.0 portion constituted between 20% and 60% of the total PM emission. Typical particle size distributions for different processes were presented as cumulative frequency distributions and as frequency distributions. The particle size distributions determined for the different plant types show interesting similarities and differences depending on whether the processes are thermal, mechanical, chemical or mixed. Consequently, for the z groups of plant investigated, a major finding of this study has been that the particle size distribution is a characteristic of the industrial process. Attempts to correlate particle size distributions of different plants to different gas cleaning technologies did not lead to usable results. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:6236 / 6254
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Indoor air quality modeling for PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0 in naturally ventilated classrooms of an urban Indian school building
    Goyal, Radha
    Khare, Mukesh
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2011, 176 (1-4) : 501 - 516
  • [32] Indoor air quality modeling for PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0 in naturally ventilated classrooms of an urban Indian school building
    Radha Goyal
    Mukesh Khare
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2011, 176 : 501 - 516
  • [33] Can BSNE (Big Spring Number Eight) samplers be used to measure PM10, respirable dust, PM2.5 and PM1.0?
    Goossens, Dirk
    Buck, Brenda J.
    AEOLIAN RESEARCH, 2012, 5 : 43 - 49
  • [34] 气流输送对乌鲁木齐市PM10、PM2.5和PM1.0质量浓度的影响
    韩茜
    魏文寿
    刘明哲
    洪雯
    陆恒
    张延伟
    中国沙漠, 2013, 33 (01) : 223 - 230
  • [35] Cyclones as PM10 and PM2.5 emission measurement classifiers
    Hemerka, J.
    Branis, M.
    Vybiral, P.
    AIR POLLUTION XVIII, 2010, 136 : 395 - 406
  • [36] PM1.0 and PM2.5 characteristics in the roadside environment of Hong Kong
    Lee, SC
    Cheng, Y
    Ho, KF
    Cao, JJ
    Louie, PKK
    Chow, JC
    Watson, JG
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (03) : 157 - 165
  • [37] Comparison of PM2.5 and PM10 monitors
    Williams, R
    Suggs, J
    Rodes, C
    Lawless, P
    Zweidinger, R
    Kwok, R
    Creason, J
    Sheldon, L
    JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (05): : 497 - 505
  • [38] PM10 and PM2.5:: an international perspective
    Sloss, LL
    Smith, IM
    FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 65 : 127 - 141
  • [39] Comparison of PM2.5 and PM10 monitors
    RON WILLIAMS
    JACK SUGGS
    CHARLES RODES
    PHIL LAWLESS
    ROY ZWEIDINGER
    RICHARD KWOK
    JOHN CREASON
    LINDA SHELDON
    Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 2000, 10 : 497 - 505
  • [40] Retrieving visibility with PM10 and PM2.5
    Center for Atmospheric Optics, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, CAS, Hefei 230031, China
    Guangxue Jishu, 2008, 4 (608-609+612):