Follow-up examination of cement-retained implant restorations using perioscopy technology

被引:0
|
作者
Knauthe, Sophie [1 ]
机构
[1] Zahnarztliche Gemeinschaftspraxis, D-36093 Kunzell, Germany
来源
IMPLANTOLOGIE | 2015年 / 23卷 / 02期
关键词
implant; peri-implantitis; dental endoscope; dental cement; cement excess; cement-retained implant restorations; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; FRACTURE-RESISTANCE; EXCESS CEMENT; CROWNS; DISEASES; THERAPY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Implant restorations can be screw-retained or cement-retained. Thereby the careful removal of excess cement may become a problematic procedure, particularly if margins of the restorations are subgingival. The removal of cement residues may lead to pen-implant inflammation (pen-implant mucositis, peri-implantitis). The aim of this study was to determine the existence of excess zinc phosphate cement in fixed partial dentures and single crowns with subgingival margins on implants using the dental endoscope Dental View DV2 (Dental View, Lake Forest, CA, USA). Methods: In a prospective study a total of 31 implants (based on 25 subjects) were examined by the Dental View DV2. This included the assessment of parameters such as probing depths (ST), bleeding on probing (BOP), and depth of subgingival margins of single crowns and fixed partial dentures. A total of 6 implant sites were determined subgingivally: mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, and distolingual. Results: Cement remnants were observed in 60% of the subjects and in 51.6% of the implants, with 17.7% subjected to the implant sites. Most cement remnants were identified distolingually (30.3%) and distobuccally (24.2%). Further, diagnostics showed that pre-dispositional sites of premolars are in buccal and distolingual positions; and pre-dispositional sites of molars are located in distobuccal and distolingual positions. In cases of cement residue, it was found that the amount of BOP positive sites was determined at 54.5%. Analysis of pocket depths gained a mean value of 3.1 mm +/- 1.2 mm. If cement remnants were present, the mean pocket depth was 3.5 mm +/- 1.3 mm. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that dentists should be aware of potential problems when cementing restorations with subgingival margins. Clinicians may leave cement remnants that could result in pen-implant inflammation. The dental endoscope, Dental View DV2, should be used to control the removal of cement from subgingival margins of single crowns and fixed partial dentures, especially in restorations with deep subgingival margins.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 206
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A transfer method for multiple cement-retained implant restorations
    Mirfazaelian, A
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2002, 87 (06): : 692 - 694
  • [2] In Vitro Radiographic Detection of Cement Overhangs on Cement-Retained Implant Restorations
    Antonijevic, Djordje
    Obradovic-Djuricic, Kosovka
    Rakocevic, Zoran
    Medigovic, Ivana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (04) : 1068 - 1075
  • [3] Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: A critical review
    Michalakis, KX
    Hirayama, H
    Garefis, PD
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2003, 18 (05) : 719 - 728
  • [4] A Modified Plastic Shell Technique for Cement-Retained Implant Restorations
    Oezcelik, Tuncer Burak
    Yilmaz, Burak
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2010, 36 (04) : 291 - 294
  • [5] Screw- Versus Cement-Retained Implant Restorations: Current Concepts
    Lee, Angie
    Okayasu, Kozue
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2010, 19 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [6] Techniques to minimize excess luting agent in cement-retained implant restorations
    Dumbrigue, HB
    Abanomi, AA
    Cheng, LL
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2002, 87 (01): : 112 - 114
  • [7] A METHOD FOR REGISTERING THE ABUTMENT SCREW POSITION OF CEMENT-RETAINED IMPLANT RESTORATIONS
    Figueras-Alvarez, Oscar
    Cedeno, Rosario
    Cano-Batalla, Jordi
    Cabratosa-Termes, Josep
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2010, 104 (01): : 60 - 62
  • [8] A Systematic Review of Cementation Techniques to Minimize Cement Excess in Cement-Retained Implant Restorations
    Reda, Rodolfo
    Zanza, Alessio
    Cicconetti, Andrea
    Bhandi, Shilpa
    Guarnieri, Renzo
    Testarelli, Luca
    Di Nardo, Dario
    METHODS AND PROTOCOLS, 2022, 5 (01)
  • [9] Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry
    Hebel, KS
    Gajjar, RC
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1997, 77 (01): : 28 - 35
  • [10] The Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations
    Kurt, Murat
    Kulunk, Tolga
    Ural, Cagri
    Kulunk, Safak
    Danisman, Sengul
    Savas, Soner
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2013, 39 (01) : 44 - 51