Public Valuation of Direct Restorations: A Discrete Choice Experiment

被引:1
|
作者
Bailey, O. [1 ]
Stone, S. [1 ]
Ternent, L. [2 ]
Vernazza, C. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Dent Sci, Framlington Pl, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4BW, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
dental caries; operative dentistry; dental economics; patient preference; healthcare policy; health services research; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; HEALTH-CARE; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1177/00220345221108699
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Direct posterior dental restorations are commonly provided following management of dental caries. Amalgam use has been phased down and the feasibility of a phase-out by 2030 is being explored. Alternative direct restorative materials differ in their outcomes and provision. This research aimed to elicit the UK population's preferences for different attributes of restorations and their willingness to pay (WTP) for restorative services and outcomes. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was designed with patient and public involvement and distributed to a representative sample of the UK general population using an online survey. Respondents answered 17 choice tasks between pairs of scenarios that varied in levels of 7 attributes (wait for filling, clinician type, filling color, length of procedure, likely discomfort after filling, average life span of filling, and cost). An opt-out (no treatment) was included. Mixed logit models were used for data analysis. Marginal WTP for attribute levels and relative attribute importance were calculated. In total, 1,002 respondents completed the DCE. Overall, respondents were willing to pay 39.52 pound to reduce a 6-wk wait for treatment to 2 wk, 13.55 pound to have treatment by a dentist rather than a therapist, 41.66 pound to change filling color from silvery/gray to white, 0.27 pound per minute of reduced treatment time, 116.52 pound to move from persistent to no postoperative pain, and 5.44 pound per year of increased restoration longevity. Ability to pay affected willingness to pay, with low-income respondents more likely to opt out of treatment and value restoration color (white) and increased longevity significantly lower than those with higher income. Clinicians should understand potential drivers of restoration choice, so they can be discussed with individual patients to obtain consent. It is important that policy makers consider general population preferences for restorative outcomes and services, with an awareness of how income affects these, when considering the potential phase-out of amalgam restorations.
引用
收藏
页码:1572 / 1579
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Public preferences for primary care provision in Germany - a discrete choice experiment
    Krinke, Kim-Sarah
    Tangermann, Ulla
    Amelung, Volker Eric
    Krauth, Christian
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [22] Public preferences for policies promoting a healthy diet: a discrete choice experiment
    C. M. Dieteren
    I. Bonfrer
    W. B. F. Brouwer
    J. van Exel
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2023, 24 : 1429 - 1440
  • [23] Assessing the Direct Impact of Death on Discrete Choice Experiment UtilitiesAssessing the Direct Impact of Death on Discrete Choice Experiment UtilitiesH. Ameri, T. G. Poder
    Hossein Ameri
    Thomas G. Poder
    Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2025, 23 (2) : 319 - 327
  • [24] A New and Improved Experimental Design for the Discrete Choice Experiment Module of the EuroQol Valuation Technology Protocol
    Jonker, Marcel F.
    Roudijk, Bram
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (10) : 1311 - 1317
  • [25] Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment
    Nicolet, Anna
    Perraudin, Clemence
    Wagner, Joel
    Gilles, Ingrid
    Krucien, Nicolas
    Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle
    Marti, Joachim
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (04): : 485 - 496
  • [26] Eliciting the public preferences for pharmaceutical subsidy in Iran: a discrete choice experiment study
    Delpasand, Mansoor
    Olyaaeemanesh, Alireza
    Jaafaripooyan, Ebrahim
    Abdollahiasl, Akbar
    Davari, Majid
    Karyani, Ali Kazemi
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2021, 14 (01)
  • [27] Public Preferences for Allocating Ventilators in an Intensive Care Unit: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Norman, Richard
    Robinson, Suzanne
    Dickinson, Helen
    Williams, Iestyn
    Meshcheriakova, Elena
    Manipis, Kathleen
    Anstey, Matthew
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (03): : 319 - 330
  • [28] 'It's a match!': a discrete choice experiment on job attractiveness for public service jobs
    Ripoll, Guillem
    Ballart, Xavier
    Hernandez, Enrique
    Vandenabeele, Wouter
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2025, 27 (01) : 183 - 217
  • [29] Public preferences in healthcare resource allocation: A discrete choice experiment in South Korea
    Bae, Eun-Young
    Lim, Min Kyoung
    Lee, Boram
    Bae, Green
    Hong, Jihyung
    HEALTH POLICY, 2023, 138
  • [30] Public Preferences for Allocating Ventilators in an Intensive Care Unit: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Richard Norman
    Suzanne Robinson
    Helen Dickinson
    Iestyn Williams
    Elena Meshcheriakova
    Kathleen Manipis
    Matthew Anstey
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2021, 14 : 319 - 330