Social Neuroscience and Public Policy on Intergroup Relations: A Hegelian Analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Kang, Sonia K. [1 ]
Inzlicht, Michael
Derks, Belle [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON M5S 3G3, Canada
[2] Leiden Univ, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
STEREOTYPE THREAT; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; NEURAL SIGNALS; BRAIN; RACE; PERCEPTION; IMPACT; STIGMA; BIAS; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01664.x
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Social neuroscience is an exciting new field with much to offer to the study of stigma and intergroup relations. In this article, we consider the potential impact that social neuroscience will have for social and public policy pertaining to these important topics. Taking a Hegelian approach, we discuss why social neuroscience should and should not be used by intergroup researchers and policy makers to inform public policy. We then critique these arguments and provide suggestions for best practices. Overall, our assessment of the potential for social neuroscience to inform public policy is positive, but we encourage researchers and policy makers alike to use this new methodology with social responsibility and frugality in mind.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 601
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条