Trends in primary treatment for localized prostate cancer according to the availability of treatment modalities and the impact of introducing robotic surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Hori, Shunta [1 ]
Nakai, Yasushi [1 ]
Tomizawa, Mitsuru [1 ]
Morizawa, Yosuke [1 ]
Gotoh, Daisuke [1 ]
Miyake, Makito [1 ]
Anai, Satoshi [1 ]
Torimoto, Kazumasa [1 ]
Yoneda, Tatsuo [1 ]
Fujimoto, Kiyohide [1 ]
Tanaka, Nobumichi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nara Med Univ, Dept Urol, 840 Shijo Cho, Kashihara, Nara 6348522, Japan
[2] Nara Med Univ, Dept Prostate Brachytherapy, Nara, Japan
关键词
primary treatment; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; radiotherapy; robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY;
D O I
10.1111/iju.15003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives We aimed to investigate the effect of available treatment modalities on primary treatment selection in patients with localized prostate cancer and that of introducing robotic surgery. Methods We retrospectively studied 12 061 patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer between 2004 and 2018 from 21 institutions. These institutions were divided into five groups according to the availability of surgery and radiotherapy. Differences in primary treatment selection between the institutions were investigated, and the predictive factors involved in the selection were explored. Results Surgery, radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, and active surveillance/watchful waiting were selected as primary treatment in 4115, 3621, 3188, and 821 patients, respectively, while the remaining 316 patients selected other modalities. The number of patients, particularly young patients, was much higher in institutions with both surgery and radiotherapy. With the introduction of robotic surgery, open radical prostatectomy has decreased, and robotic surgery made up approximately 70% of all prostatectomies. Institutions with both surgery and radiotherapy tended to treat patients with very low or low risk by surgery or radiotherapy, while institutions without surgery and radiotherapy tended to select active surveillance or watchful waiting. Multivariate analysis revealed that primary treatment selection for prostate cancer was affected not only by clinical factors, but also by the available modalities in each institution. Conclusions Differences in available treatment modalities affect the selection of primary treatment for localized prostate cancer. Introduction of robotic surgery also has a strong influence on the number of patients in each institution.
引用
收藏
页码:1371 / 1379
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Understanding the impact of primary care providers on treatment decisions for men with localized prostate cancer.
    Radhakrishnan, Archana
    Grande, David
    Crossette, Linda
    Bekelman, Justin E.
    Pollack, Craig Evan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (03)
  • [32] Quality of life in patients with localized prostate cancer according to treatment and biochemical relapse
    Avila, Monica
    Pont Acunda, Angels
    Garin, Olatz
    Ferrer, Montserrat
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 : 22 - 22
  • [33] CONTEMPORARY TRENDS OF IMAGING AFTER PRIMARY TREATMENT FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Washington, Sam
    Tranh Trang
    Trusedale, Matthew
    Cowan, Janet
    Carroll, Peter
    Cooperberg, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E831 - E831
  • [34] Primary vaginal cancer: treatment modalities
    Ramachandra, C.
    Ramalingappa, C. A.
    Deepa, B., V
    Desai, K.
    Vidyanandini, G. M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 : 240 - 241
  • [35] Stereotactic body radiation therapy for the primary treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Oliai, Caspian
    Lanciano, Rachelle
    Sprandio, Brian
    Yang, Jun
    Lamond, John
    Arrigo, Steven
    Good, Michael
    Mooreville, Michael
    Garber, Bruce
    Brady, Luther W.
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 2 (01) : 63 - 70
  • [36] Treatment Trends for Prostate Cancer
    Voog, Justin C.
    Efstathiou, Jason A.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 314 (18): : 1976 - 1977
  • [37] Comorbidity and primary treatment for localized prostate cancer:: Data from CAPSURE™
    Marr, PL
    Elkin, EP
    Arredondo, SA
    Broering, JM
    DuChane, J
    Carroll, PR
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 1326 - 1331
  • [38] Localized prostate cancer followed by cryoablation as primary treatment for penile rehabilitation
    Ellis, David S.
    Manny, Theodore B., Jr.
    Rewcastle, John C.
    UROLOGY, 2007, 69 (02) : 306 - 310
  • [39] Cryosurgery as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer: A community hospital experience
    Ellis, DS
    UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (2A) : 34 - 39
  • [40] Neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment modalities for prostate cancer
    Erkan, Erkan
    Toktas, Gokhan
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2011, 10 (02): : 63 - 69