Conversion from assisted reproductive technology to intrauterine insemination in low responders: Is it advantageous?

被引:10
|
作者
Norian, John M. [1 ,2 ]
Levens, Eric D. [2 ]
Richter, Kevin S. [2 ]
Widra, Eric A. [2 ]
Levy, Michael J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Program Reprod & Adult Endocrinol, NIH, CRC, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Shady Grove Fertil Reprod Sci Ctr, Rockville, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ART; oocyte retrieval; intrauterine insemination; poor response; FERTILIZATION; FOLLICLES; CYCLES; LESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.056
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine cycle outcomes among patients demonstrating an attenuated ovarian response that proceeded to oocyte retrieval to those converted to intrauterine insemination (IUI). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Large private fertility center. Patient(s): First planned autologous assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles among women demonstrating a poor ovarian response to hyperstimulation (<= 4 follicles >= 14 mm, peak E-2 <1,000 IU/L at hCG administration). Intervention(s): Oocyte retrieval or IUI conversion. Main Outcome Measure(s): Live birth and clinical pregnancy. Result(s): A total of 269 IUI conversions and 167 oocyte retrievals followed a poor ovarian response to gonadotropins among first planned ART cycles. Number of follicles >= 14 mm (2.3 vs. 3.5) and peak E-2 levels (555 vs. 743 pg/mL) were lower for IUI conversions compared with those proceeding to ART. Peak E-2 was similar between groups after adjusting for follicle number (IUI: 611 pg/mL; ART: 652 pg/mL). Stimulation response was similar between treatment groups with equivalent follicle numbers. Undergoing oocyte retrieval was associated with significantly improved pregnancy (odds ratio [OR] 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-7.4) and live birth outcome (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7-8.0) after adjusting for age and follicle number. Conclusion(s): Among women demonstrating a poor ovarian response to gonadotropins, proceeding with planned ART resulted in significantly higher pregnancy rates than converting these cycles to IUI. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010; 94: 2073-7. (C) 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:2073 / 2077
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Use of Ovulation Stimulation (OS) Alone, Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) and Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) and the Risk of Multiplicity: The TWINPREG Study
    Berard, A.
    Sheehy, O.
    Fraser, W.
    Bissonnette, F.
    Tan, S. L.
    Trasler, J.
    Monnier, P.
    BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART A-CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR TERATOLOGY, 2011, 91 (05) : 346 - 346
  • [42] Use of Ovulation Stimulation (OS) Alone, Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) and Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) and the Risk of Multiplicity - The TWINPREG Study
    Berard, Anick
    Sheehy, Odile
    Fraser, William
    Bissonnette, Francois
    Tan, Seang-Lin
    Trasler, Jacquetta
    Monnier, Patricia
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2011, 20 : S266 - S266
  • [43] Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1998 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry
    Zeitz, J
    McNamee, P
    Toner, JP
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 77 (01) : 18 - 31
  • [45] Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry
    Kornafel, Kathleen L.
    Ho, Minh N.
    Henderson, Simon R.
    Sgarlata, Carmelo S.
    Koopersmith, Tina
    Cowart, Catherine L.
    Riggall, Frank C.
    Pabon, Julio E.
    Jabamoni, Reena
    Levrant, Seth
    Ying, Yu-Kang
    Nash, Lillian D.
    Husami, Nabil
    Bennett, Henry G.
    Beauchamp, Pedro J.
    Brumley, Harold W.
    Youngkin, Jeffrey
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 87 (06) : 1253 - 1266
  • [46] Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1996 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry
    Bustillo, M
    Yee, B
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 71 (05) : 798 - 807
  • [48] Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1997 results generated from the American society for reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry
    Adamson, GD
    Brzyski, RG
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 74 (04) : 641 - 653
  • [49] Evaluation of intrauterine insemination practices: a 1-year prospective study in seven French assisted reproduction technology centers
    Monraisin, Oriana
    Chansel-Debordeaux, Lucie
    Chiron, Alexandra
    Floret, Sebastien
    Cens, Steven
    Bourrinet, Sylvain
    Paulhac, Sophie
    Jimenez, Clement
    Parinaud, Jean
    Leandri, Roger
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 105 (06) : 1589 - 1593
  • [50] Assisted reproductive technology or infertility: What underlies adverse outcomes? Lessons from the Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Stern, Judy E.
    Farland, Leslie, V
    Hwang, Sunah S.
    Dukhovny, Dmitry
    Coddington, Charles C.
    Cabral, Howard J.
    Missmer, Stacey A.
    Declercq, Eugene
    Diop, Hafsatou
    F&S REVIEWS, 2022, 3 (04): : 242 - 255