Towards a method for business process and informal business rules compliance

被引:7
|
作者
De Nicola, Antonio [1 ,2 ]
Missikoff, Michele [2 ]
Smith, Fabrizio [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] ENEA, Rome, Italy
[2] IASI CNR, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Aquila, DIEI, I-67100 Laquila, Italy
关键词
business process modeling; business rules; business process reengineering; semantic annotation; business process querying; COMPLIANCE-CHECKING; VERIFICATION;
D O I
10.1002/smr.553
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Business process reengineering (BPR) is a common practice for a continuous improvement of the organization and the operations of an enterprise. An important technique of BPR is based on business rules (BRs). The latter are, in general, represented using natural language and, therefore, carry a certain degree of imprecision and ambiguity; therefore, our first objective is to start from informal BR and disambiguate them by using a question answering method based on a decision table. The introduction of BRs impacts on existing business processes (BPs), requiring often a reengineering intervention. In this paper, we present an approach to BPR based on the systematic use of ontologies and semantic annotations and focused on dependency constraints, a particular kind of BRs. To this end, we propose the synergic use of Business Process Abstract Language, a BP modeling framework to represent BP schemas, and Object Process Actor modeling Language, an ontological framework to capture the semantics of a business scenario. Both the frameworks are grounded in logic, and therefore, it is possible to apply effective reasoning methods to make inferences over a Business Process Knowledge Base stemming from the union of the two above components. Then we propose a query engine allowing for the detection of BPs that are not compliant with the BRs and, more precisely, the specific BP segment where to intervene. The proposed platform has been conceived not to substitute existing BPM tools but to integrate them providing advanced services to support rule-based BPR activities. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 360
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Norm Compliance in Business Process Modeling
    Governatori, Guido
    Rotolo, Antonino
    SEMANTIC WEB RULES, 2010, 6403 : 194 - +
  • [32] Workflow Signatures for Business Process Compliance
    Lim, Hoon Wei
    Kerschbaum, Florian
    Wang, Huaxiong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DEPENDABLE AND SECURE COMPUTING, 2012, 9 (05) : 756 - 769
  • [33] Business Process Regulatory Compliance is Hard
    Tosatto, Silvano Colombo
    Governatori, Guido
    Kelsen, Pierre
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SERVICES COMPUTING, 2015, 8 (06) : 958 - 970
  • [34] Modeling and Analysis of Business Process Compliance
    Becker, Joerg
    Ahrendt, Christoph
    Coners, Andre
    Weiss, Burkhard
    Winkelmann, Axel
    GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABILITY IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS: MANAGING THE TRANSFER AND DIFFUSION OF IT, 2011, 366 : 259 - 269
  • [35] Compliance aware business process design
    Lu, Ruopeng
    Sadiq, Shazia
    Governatori, Guido
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT WORKSHOPS, 2008, 4928 : 120 - 131
  • [36] A Roadmap for Research in Business Process Compliance
    Sadiq, Shazia
    BUSINESS INFORMATION SYSTEMS WORKSHOPS (BIS 2011), 2011, 97 : 1 - 4
  • [37] Business Process Compliance with impact constraints
    Workneh, Tewabe Chekole
    Sala, Pietro
    Rizzi, Romeo
    Cristani, Matteo
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2025, 129
  • [38] Formalizing and appling compliance patterns for business process compliance
    Elgammal, Amal
    Turetken, Oktay
    van den Heuvel, Willem-Jan
    Papazoglou, Mike
    SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS MODELING, 2016, 15 (01): : 119 - 146
  • [39] Formalizing and appling compliance patterns for business process compliance
    Amal Elgammal
    Oktay Turetken
    Willem-Jan van den Heuvel
    Mike Papazoglou
    Software & Systems Modeling, 2016, 15 : 119 - 146
  • [40] Process Mining and Performance Business Rules
    Roubtsova, Ella
    Berk, Yoeri
    ENASE: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION OF NOVEL APPROACHES TO SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2022, : 387 - 394