The political effects of emergency frames in sustainability

被引：49
|
作者：
Patterson, James [1 ]
Wyborn, Carina [2 ]
Westman, Linda [3 ]
Brisbois, Marie Claire [4 ]
Milkoreit, Manjana [5 ]
Jayaram, Dhanasree [6 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Fac Geosci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Inst Water Futures, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Coll Sci, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Univ Sheffield, Urban Inst, Sheffield, England
[4] Univ Sussex, Sci Policy Res Unit SPRU, Sussexe, England
[5] Univ Oslo, Dept Sociol & Human Geog, Oslo, Norway
[6] Manipal Acad Higher Educ, Dept Geopolit & Int Relat, Manipal, India
来源：
NATURE SUSTAINABILITY | 2021年 / 4卷 / 10期
基金：
欧洲研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词：
CLIMATE-CHANGE; KERALA FLOODS; CRISIS; RISK; TIME; FEAR; APOCALYPSE; EXCEPTION; TOMORROW; BUSHFIRE;
D O I：
10.1038/s41893-021-00749-9
中图分类号：
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号：
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要：
Emergency frames are mobilized in contemporary sustainability debates, both in response to specific events and strategically. The strategic deployment of emergency frames by proponents of sustainability action aims to stimulate collective action on issues for which it is lacking. But this is contentious due to a range of possible effects. We critically review interdisciplinary social science literature to examine the political effects of emergency frames in sustainability and develop a typology of five key dimensions of variation. This pinpoints practical areas for evaluating the utility of emergency frames and builds a shared vocabulary for analysis and decision-making. Emergency frames in sustainability debates can stimulate collective action on issues for which it is lacking but can have consequences. This Review examines the political effects of emergency frames in sustainability and develops a typology of different effects to build a shared vocabulary for analysis and decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码：841 / 850
页数：10
相关论文
共 50 条
12345