Extended drainage versus resection in surgery for chronic pancreatitis -: A prospective randomized trial comparing the longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy combined with local pancreatic head excision with the pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy

被引:268
|
作者
Izbicki, JR
Bloechle, C
Broering, DC
Knoefel, WT
Kuechler, T
Broelsch, CE
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Dept Surg, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Kiel, Dept Surg, Sect Med Psychol, Kiel, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000658-199812000-00008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To analyze the efficacy of extended drainage-that is, longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy combined with local pancreatic head excision (LPJ-LPHE)-and pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) in terms of pain relief, control of complications arising from adjacent organs, and quality of life. Summary Background Data Based on the hypotheses of pain origin (ductal hypertension and perineural inflammatory infiltration), drainage and resection constitute the main principles of surgery for chronic pancreatitis, Methods Sixty-one patients were randomly allocated to either LPJ-LPHE (n = 31) or PPPD (n = 30). The interval between symptoms and surgery ranged from 12 months to 10 years (mean 5.1 years). In addition to routine pancreatic diagnostic workup, a multidimensional psychometric quality-of-life questionnaire and a pain score were used. Endocrine and exocrine functions were assessed in terms of oral glucose tolerance and serum concentrations of insulin, C-peptide, and HbA(1c), as well as fecal chymotrypsin and pancreolauryl testing. During a median follow-up of 24 months (range 12 to 36), patients were reassessed in the outpatient clinic. Results One patient died of cardiovascular failure in the LPJ-LPHE group (3.2%); there were no deaths in the PPPD group. Over ail, the rate of in-hospital complications was 19.4% in the LPJ-LPHE group and 53.3% in the PPPD group, including delayed gastric emptying in 9 of 30 patients (30%; p < 0.05). Complications of adjacent organs were definitively resolved in 93.5% in the LPJ-LPHE group and in 100% in the PPPD group. The pain score decreased by 94% after LPJ-LPHE and by 95% after PPPD. Global quality of life improved by 71% in the LPJ-LPHE group and by 43% in the PPPD group (p < 0.01). Conclusions Both procedures are equally effective in terms of pain relief and definitive control of complications affecting adjacent organs, but extended drainage by LPJ-LPHE provides a better quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:771 / 779
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] Quality of life in chronic pancreatitis: A prospective trial comparing classical whipple procedure and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection
    Helmut Witzigmann
    Doreen Max
    Dirk Uhlmann
    Felix Geiβler
    Stefan Ludwig
    Reinhold Schwarz
    Oliver Krauβ
    Tobias Lohmann
    Volker Keim
    Johann Hauss
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2002, 6 : 173 - 180
  • [22] ChroPac-Trial: Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Trial protocol of a randomised controlled multicentre trial
    Diener, Markus K.
    Bruckner, Thomas
    Contin, Pietro
    Halloran, Christopher
    Glanemann, Matthias
    Schlitt, Hans Juergen
    Moessner, Joachim
    Kieser, Meinhard
    Werner, Jens
    Buechler, Markus W.
    Seiler, Christoph M.
    TRIALS, 2010, 11
  • [23] Quality of life in chronic pancreatitis: A prospective trial comparing classical Whipple procedure and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection
    Witzigmann, H
    Max, D
    Uhlmann, D
    Geissler, F
    Ludwig, S
    Schwarz, R
    Krauss, O
    Lohmann, T
    Keim, V
    Hauss, J
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2002, 6 (02) : 173 - 179
  • [24] ChroPac-Trial: Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Trial protocol of a randomised controlled multicentre trial
    Markus K Diener
    Thomas Bruckner
    Pietro Contin
    Christopher Halloran
    Matthias Glanemann
    Hans Jürgen Schlitt
    Joachim Mössner
    Meinhard Kieser
    Jens Werner
    Markus W Büchler
    Christoph M Seiler
    Trials, 11
  • [25] DUODENUM-PRESERVING RESECTION OF THE HEAD OF THE PANCREAS IN CHRONIC-PANCREATITIS - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    IZBICKI, JR
    BLOECHLE, C
    KNOEFEL, WT
    KUECHLER, T
    BINMOELLER, KF
    BROELSCH, CE
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 221 (04) : 350 - 358
  • [26] Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Outcome of Duodenum Preserving Pancreatic Head Coring With Duodenum Preserving Pancreatic Head and Body Coring in Chronic Pancreatitis
    Moond, Vikash
    Gupta, Rajesh
    Rana, Surinder S.
    Nada, Ritambhra
    Kang, Mandeep
    Singh, Rajinder
    Bhasin, Deepak K.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S1233 - S1233
  • [27] Experience of Local Resection of the Head of the Pancreas Combined With Longitudinal Pancreaticojejunostomy: Frey's Procedure in the Managemnt of Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis
    Kuroda, N.
    Satake, M.
    Suzumura, K.
    Takahashi, M.
    Ohashi, K.
    Yoshida, Y.
    Asano, Y.
    Okada, T.
    Oh, K.
    Fujimoto, J.
    PANCREAS, 2009, 38 (08) : 1021 - 1021
  • [28] Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing Beger with pylorus-preserving Whipple procedure for chronic pancreatitis
    Mueller, M. W.
    Friess, H.
    Martin, D. J.
    Hinz, U.
    Dahmen, R.
    Buechler, M. W.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 95 (03) : 350 - 356
  • [29] Quality of life in chronic pancreatitis: A prospective trial comparing classical Whipple procedure and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection - Discussion
    Zenilman, M
    Witzigmann, H
    Sarr, M
    Traverso, L
    Bell, R
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2002, 6 (02) : 179 - 180
  • [30] Standard pancreatoduodenectomy versus extended pancreatoduodenectomy with modified retroperitoneal nerve resection in patients with pancreatic head cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
    Lin, Qing
    Zheng, Shangyou
    Yu, Xianjun
    Chen, Meifu
    Zhou, Yu
    Zhou, Quanbo
    Hu, Chonghui
    Gu, Jing
    Xu, Zhongdong
    Wang, Lin
    Liu, Yimin
    Liu, Qingyu
    Wang, Min
    Li, Guolin
    Cheng, He
    Zhou, Dongkai
    Liu, Guodong
    Fu, Zhiqiang
    Long, Yu
    Li, Yixiong
    Wang, Weilin
    Qin, Renyi
    Li, Zhihua
    Chen, Rufu
    CANCER COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 43 (02) : 257 - 275