ENTREPRENEURSHIP FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD: A REVIEW, CRITIQUE, AND PATH FORWARD FOR SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP RESEARCH

被引:98
|
作者
Vedula, Siddharth [1 ]
Doblinger, Claudia [2 ]
Pacheco, Desiree [3 ]
York, Jeffrey G. [4 ]
Bacq, Sophie [5 ]
Russo, Michael, V [6 ]
Dean, Thomas J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Management, Entrepreneurship, Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Innovat & Technol Management, Campus Straubing Biotechnol & Sustainabil, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
[4] Univ Colorado, Strategy & Entrepreneurship, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[5] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Entrepreneurship, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[6] Univ Oregon, Sustainable Management, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[7] Colorado State Univ, Entrepreneurship & Sustainable Enterprise, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
来源
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS | 2022年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
MARKET-BASED APPROACH; SUSTAINABLE ENTREPRENEURSHIP; GRAND CHALLENGES; BUSINESS MODELS; INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP; WIND ENERGY; COMMERCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP; RESEARCH COLLABORATION; HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS; TEAM FORMATION;
D O I
10.5465/annals.2019.0143
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Entrepreneurship is routinely promoted as a solution to our most pressing societal and environmental challenges. Two emerging literature streams have sought to examine how and when such solutions may emerge. In this review, we examine the literature on social entrepreneurship (SE) and environmental entrepreneurship (EE) to expose potential linkages, disconnects, and a path forward. We do so by combining bibliometric network analyses with a detailed qualitative review of the literature from 1994 to 2019. Through this process we: (a) identify a pattern of convergent evolution, whereby SE and EE share some common elements today, while originating in distinct scholarly communities with different epistemological roots; (b) offer a conceptual framework that identifies specific areas for collaboration and learning between SE and EE; and (c) propose how these streams can be integrated in order to elevate the impact of the field of entrepreneurship. We argue that such integration can enable entrepreneurship research to fulfill its promise of understanding how and when entrepreneurial action contributes to the public good.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 425
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条