Effects of paludiculture products on reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural peatlands

被引:24
|
作者
Lahtinen, Laura [1 ]
Mattila, Tuomas [1 ]
Myllyviita, Tanja [1 ]
Seppala, Jyri [1 ]
Vasander, Harri [2 ]
机构
[1] SYKE Finnish Environm Inst, Latokartanonkaari 11, Helsinki 00790, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Forest Sci, Latokartanonkaari 7, Helsinki 00790, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Carbon footprint; Cattail; Common reed; Climate change impact; Life cycle assessment; Paludiculture; Peatland; METHANE EMISSIONS; PHRAGMITES; WETLANDS; FLUXES; CULTIVATION; BALANCES; REED;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106502
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Drained peatlands are a large emission source and a shift to paludiculture (rewetting and cultivation of wettolerant plants) is emerging as a potential emission reduction measure. Paludiculture can potentially results in emission savings from direct emissions, product substitution and carbon storage, but the whole life cycle climate impacts are rarely studied. In this study, we evaluated two paludiculture product systems (cattail (Typha) construction board and common reed (Phragmites) horticultural vermicompost) with cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) applied global sensitivity analysis to identify, which parts of the product system would need more research and product development to ensure net emission savings. Based on the results, both product systems result in much lower emissions than current agricultural land use and may be net greenhouse gas sinks (average - 6.0 tCO2eq ha-1 for cattail board; -3.0 tCO2eq ha-1 for reed growing media). The uncertainty in the product life cycle is concentrated to a few key processes: the direct CO2 and CH4 emissions from paludiculture, construction board additives, and CH4 emissions from vermicomposting reed. Further research to these would minimize the uncertainty and help in maximizing the climate mitigation potential of paludiculture derived products.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Agricultural subsidies and global greenhouse gas emissions
    Laborde, David
    Mamun, Abdullah
    Martin, Will
    Pineiro, Valeria
    Vos, Rob
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [42] Agricultural subsidies and global greenhouse gas emissions
    David Laborde
    Abdullah Mamun
    Will Martin
    Valeria Piñeiro
    Rob Vos
    Nature Communications, 12
  • [43] Agricultural opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions
    Johnson, Jane M. -F.
    Franzluebbers, Alan J.
    Weyers, Sharon Lachnicht
    Reicosky, Donald C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2007, 150 (01) : 107 - 124
  • [44] Industries of the future reducing: Greenhouse gas emissions
    Anderson, Arlene
    EM: Air and Waste Management Association's Magazine for Environmental Managers, 1999, (MAR.): : 13 - 21
  • [45] Adsorptive methods in reducing greenhouse gas emissions
    Warmuzinski, K
    Tanczyk, M
    Jaschik, M
    INZYNIERIA CHEMICZNA I PROCESOWA, 2004, 25 (02): : 275 - 288
  • [46] EVALUATION OF AGRICULTURAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IN GERMANY
    Wegener, J. K.
    Luecke, W.
    APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2008, 24 (06) : 775 - 783
  • [47] Nitrogenous Gas Emissions from Soils and Greenhouse Gas Effects
    Gregorich, Ed
    Janzen, H. Henry
    Helgason, Bobbi
    Ellert, Ben
    ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 132, 2015, 132 : 39 - 74
  • [48] A global study on decoupling greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural development
    Batoukhteh, Fereshteh
    Darzi-Naftchali, Abdullah
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (05) : 13159 - 13183
  • [49] Machine learning for predicting greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils
    Hamrani, Abderrachid
    Akbarzadeh, Abdolhamid
    Madramootoo, Chandra A.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 741
  • [50] Editorial: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation From Agricultural and Horticultural Systems
    Schwarz, Dietmar
    Harrison, Matthew Tom
    Katsoulas, Nikolaos
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2022, 6