Cancer stem cell markers in breast cancer: pathological, clinical and prognostic significance

被引:83
|
作者
Ali, H. Raza [1 ,2 ]
Dawson, Sarah-Jane [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Blows, Fiona M. [6 ]
Provenzano, Elena [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,7 ]
Pharoah, Paul D. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Caldas, Carlos [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Oncol, Cambridge CB1 9RN, England
[2] Li Ka Shing Ctr, Canc Res UK Cambridge Res Inst, Cambridge CB2 ORE, England
[3] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Addenbrookes Hosp, Cambridge Breast Unit, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
[4] NIHR Cambridge Biomed Res Ctr, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
[5] Li Ka Shing Ctr, Canc Res UK Cambridge Res Inst, Cambridge Expt Canc Med Ctr ECMC, Cambridge CB2 0RE, England
[6] Univ Cambridge, Strangeways Res Labs, Cambridge CB1 9RN, England
[7] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Histopathol, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
来源
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH | 2011年 / 13卷 / 06期
关键词
MOLECULAR HETEROGENEITY; TISSUE MICROARRAYS; EXPRESSION; SURVIVAL; CD44(+)/CD24(-/LOW); IDENTIFICATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; ASSOCIATION; CARCINOMAS; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1186/bcr3061
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: The cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis states that tumours consist of a cellular hierarchy with CSCs at the apex driving tumour recurrence and metastasis. Hence, CSCs are potentially of profound clinical importance. We set out to establish the clinical relevance of breast CSC markers by profiling a large cohort of breast tumours in tissue microarrays (TMAs) using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Methods: We included 4, 125 patients enrolled in the SEARCH population-based study with tumours represented in TMAs and classified into molecular subtype according to a validated IHC-based five-marker scheme. IHC was used to detect CD44/CD24, ALDH1A1, aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1 member A3 (ALDH1A3) and integrin alpha-6 (ITGA6). A 'Total CSC' score representing expression of all four CSC markers was also investigated. Association with breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) at 10 years was assessed using a Cox proportional-hazards model. This study was complied with REMARK criteria. Results: In ER negative cases, multivariate analysis showed that ITGA6 was an independent prognostic factor with a time-dependent effect restricted to the first two years of follow-up (hazard ratio (HR) for 0 to 2 years follow-up, 2.4; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.2 to 4.8; P = 0.009). The composite 'Total CSC' score carried independent prognostic significance in ER negative cases for the first four years of follow-up (HR for 0 to 4 years follow-up, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.6; P = 0.006). Conclusions: Breast CSC markers do not identify identical subpopulations in primary tumours. Both ITGA6 and a composite Total CSC score show independent prognostic significance in ER negative disease. The use of multiple markers to identify tumours enriched for CSCs has the greatest prognostic value. In the absence of more specific markers, we propose that the effective translation of the CSC hypothesis into patient benefit will necessitate the use of a panel of markers to robustly identify tumours enriched for CSCs.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] BREAST CANCER STEM CELLS - DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE
    Petrova, Zdravka
    Spasov, Rossen
    Alexandrova, Radostina
    COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE BULGARE DES SCIENCES, 2024, 77 (01): : 40 - 47
  • [22] Clinical significance of prognostic and predictive markers in colorectal cancer
    Longley D.B.
    McDermott U.
    Johnston P.G.
    The Pharmacogenomics Journal, 2002, 2 (4) : 209 - 216
  • [23] Breast cancer stem cell markers - the rocky road to clinical applications
    Dontu, Gabriela
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (05)
  • [24] Breast cancer stem cell markers – the rocky road to clinical applications
    Gabriela Dontu
    Breast Cancer Research, 10
  • [25] Prognostic Significance of Cytokeratin Markers in Breast Cancer - a Meta Analysis
    Barak, V.
    Uziely, B.
    Hubert, A.
    Nisman, B.
    Goike, H.
    Einarsson, R.
    Peretz, T.
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2008, 29 : 32 - 32
  • [26] Prognostic Significance of Immunohistochemical Markers in Triple Negative Breast Cancer
    Han, Rachel
    Nofech-Mozes, Sharon
    Olkhov-Mitsel, Ekaterina
    Chehade, Rania
    Jerzak, Katarzyna J.
    Slodkowska, Elzbieta
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2023, 103 (03) : S140 - S141
  • [27] Prognostic significance of cytokeratin markers in breast cancer - a meta analysis
    Barak, V.
    Aronsson, A. C.
    Novikov, I.
    Peretz, T.
    Einarsson, R.
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2012, 33 : 34 - 35
  • [28] PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF CYTOKERATIN MARKERS IN BREAST CANCER - A META ANALYSIS
    Barak, V.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24 : 28 - 28
  • [29] Prognostic Significance of Cytokeratin Markers in Breast Cancer -a Meta Analysis
    Barak, V.
    Uziely, B.
    Hubert, A.
    Nisman, B.
    Goike, H.
    Einarsson, R.
    Peretz, T.
    BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2008, 62 (08) : 518 - 518
  • [30] Cancer stem cell markers in locally advanced breast cancer
    Tiezzi, Daniel G.
    Sicchieri, Renata D.
    Antonio, Heriton M. R.
    Mouro, Larissa R.
    da Silva, Joao Santana
    de Andrade, Jurandyr Moreira
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)