Cancer stem cell markers in breast cancer: pathological, clinical and prognostic significance

被引:83
|
作者
Ali, H. Raza [1 ,2 ]
Dawson, Sarah-Jane [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Blows, Fiona M. [6 ]
Provenzano, Elena [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,7 ]
Pharoah, Paul D. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Caldas, Carlos [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Oncol, Cambridge CB1 9RN, England
[2] Li Ka Shing Ctr, Canc Res UK Cambridge Res Inst, Cambridge CB2 ORE, England
[3] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Addenbrookes Hosp, Cambridge Breast Unit, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
[4] NIHR Cambridge Biomed Res Ctr, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
[5] Li Ka Shing Ctr, Canc Res UK Cambridge Res Inst, Cambridge Expt Canc Med Ctr ECMC, Cambridge CB2 0RE, England
[6] Univ Cambridge, Strangeways Res Labs, Cambridge CB1 9RN, England
[7] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Histopathol, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
来源
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH | 2011年 / 13卷 / 06期
关键词
MOLECULAR HETEROGENEITY; TISSUE MICROARRAYS; EXPRESSION; SURVIVAL; CD44(+)/CD24(-/LOW); IDENTIFICATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; ASSOCIATION; CARCINOMAS; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1186/bcr3061
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: The cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis states that tumours consist of a cellular hierarchy with CSCs at the apex driving tumour recurrence and metastasis. Hence, CSCs are potentially of profound clinical importance. We set out to establish the clinical relevance of breast CSC markers by profiling a large cohort of breast tumours in tissue microarrays (TMAs) using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Methods: We included 4, 125 patients enrolled in the SEARCH population-based study with tumours represented in TMAs and classified into molecular subtype according to a validated IHC-based five-marker scheme. IHC was used to detect CD44/CD24, ALDH1A1, aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1 member A3 (ALDH1A3) and integrin alpha-6 (ITGA6). A 'Total CSC' score representing expression of all four CSC markers was also investigated. Association with breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) at 10 years was assessed using a Cox proportional-hazards model. This study was complied with REMARK criteria. Results: In ER negative cases, multivariate analysis showed that ITGA6 was an independent prognostic factor with a time-dependent effect restricted to the first two years of follow-up (hazard ratio (HR) for 0 to 2 years follow-up, 2.4; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.2 to 4.8; P = 0.009). The composite 'Total CSC' score carried independent prognostic significance in ER negative cases for the first four years of follow-up (HR for 0 to 4 years follow-up, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.6; P = 0.006). Conclusions: Breast CSC markers do not identify identical subpopulations in primary tumours. Both ITGA6 and a composite Total CSC score show independent prognostic significance in ER negative disease. The use of multiple markers to identify tumours enriched for CSCs has the greatest prognostic value. In the absence of more specific markers, we propose that the effective translation of the CSC hypothesis into patient benefit will necessitate the use of a panel of markers to robustly identify tumours enriched for CSCs.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cancer stem cell markers in breast cancer: pathological, clinical and prognostic significance
    H Raza Ali
    Sarah-Jane Dawson
    Fiona M Blows
    Elena Provenzano
    Paul D Pharoah
    Carlos Caldas
    Breast Cancer Research, 13
  • [2] Clinical and pathological significance of cancer stem cells markers
    Hulais, Reem A. L.
    Ralph, Stephen
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 20 : 115 - 115
  • [3] PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF CANCER STEM CELL MARKERS IN CERVICAL CANCER
    Kim, B.
    Cho, H.
    Kim, J. H.
    Hewitt, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (09) : 988 - 989
  • [4] Clinical Significance of Cancer Stem Cell Markers in Primary and Metastatic Tissues in Patients With Breast Cancer
    Yamanaka, Takashi
    Oshima, Takashi
    Murayama, Daisuke
    Okamoto, Saki
    Matsui, Ai
    Yasukawa, Mio
    Matsubara, Yuka
    Toda, Soji
    Hiroshima, Yukihiko
    Aoyama, Toru
    Suganuma, Nobuyasu
    Rino, Yasushi
    Saito, Aya
    Miyagi, Yohei
    Iwasaki, Hiroyuki
    Yamashita, Toshinari
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 43 (05) : 2145 - 2154
  • [5] Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance
    Taneja, Pankaj
    Maglic, Dejan
    Kai, Fumitake
    Zhu, Sinan
    Kendig, Robert D.
    Fry, Elizabeth A.
    Inoue, Kazushi
    CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ONCOLOGY, 2010, 4 : 15 - 34
  • [6] Clinical prognostic significance of cancer stem cell markers in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma
    Ryu, Yoon-Jong
    Choe, Ji-Young
    Lee, Kyoungyul
    Ahn, Soon-Hyun
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2020, 19 (01) : 343 - 349
  • [7] Expression and prognostic significance of putative cancer stem cell markers in colorectal cancer
    Muraro, M. G.
    Mele, V.
    Frey, D. M.
    Oertli, D.
    Zuber, M.
    Heberer, M.
    Spagnoli, G. C.
    Lugli, A.
    Zlobec, I.
    Iezzi, G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 : S15 - S15
  • [8] The clinical, prognostic and therapeutic significance of liver cancer stem cells and their markers
    Zarebska, Izabela
    Gzil, Arkadiusz
    Durslewicz, Justyna
    Jaworski, Damian
    Antosik, Paulina
    Ahmadi, Navid
    Smolinska-Switala, Marta
    Grzanka, Dariusz
    Szylberg, Lukasz
    CLINICS AND RESEARCH IN HEPATOLOGY AND GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 45 (03)
  • [9] PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF TUMOR MARKERS IN BREAST CANCER
    Barak, V.
    Uziely, B.
    Hubert, A.
    Kalichman, I.
    Einarsson, R.
    Peretz, T.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (10) : 5829 - 5830
  • [10] Clinical significance of cancer stem cell markers in lung carcinoma
    Zhang, Liang
    Shen, Lianglan
    Wu, Dijun
    ACTA BIOCHIMICA POLONICA, 2021, 68 (02) : 187 - 191