The contribution of attention to the right visual field advantage for word recognition

被引:41
|
作者
Nicholls, MER [1 ]
Wood, AG [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Psychol, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
关键词
left hemisphere; right hemisphere; asymmetry; lateralization; cueing; late selection; early selection;
D O I
10.1006/brcg.1998.1052
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Perceptual asymmetries have been explained by structural, attentional bias and attentional advantage models. Structural models focus on asymmetries in the physical access information has to the hemispheres, whereas attentional models focus on asymmetries in the operation of attentional processes. A series of experiments was conducted to assess the contribution of attentional mechanisms to the right visual field (RVF) advantage found for word recognition. Valid, invalid and neutral peripheral cues were presented at a variety of stimulus onset asynchronies to manipulate spatial attention. Results indicated a significant RVF advantage and cueing effect. The effect of the cue was stronger for the left visual field than the RVF. This interaction supports the attentional advantage model which suggests that the left hemisphere requires less attention to process words. The attentional asymmetry is interpreted in terms of the different word processing styles used by the left and right hemispheres. These results have ramifications for the methodology used in divided Visual field research and the interpretation of this research. (C) 1998 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 357
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] WORD RECOGNITION, LEXICAL DECISION, AND VISUAL-FIELD
    BRADSHAW, GJ
    HICKS, RE
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1977, 10 (04) : 266 - 266
  • [22] VISUAL FIELD POSITION AND WORD-RECOGNITION THRESHOLD
    OVERTON, W
    WIENER, M
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1966, 71 (02): : 249 - &
  • [23] Individual differences in visual field shape modulate the effects of attention on the lower visual field advantage in crowding
    Fortenbaugh, Francesca C.
    Silver, Michael A.
    Robertson, Lynn C.
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2015, 15 (02):
  • [24] GLOBAL ATTRIBUTES IN VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION .2. CONTRIBUTION OF WORD-LENGTH
    SCHIEPERS, CWJ
    VISION RESEARCH, 1976, 16 (12) : 1445 - 1454
  • [25] The word shape hypothesis re-examined: evidence for an external feature advantage in visual word recognition
    Beech, JR
    Mayall, KA
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN READING, 2005, 28 (03) : 302 - 319
  • [26] Natural variation in both position coding and visual attention affects visual word recognition
    Lavis, R. E.
    Cooper, C. T.
    Cornelissen, P. L.
    PERCEPTION, 2000, 29 : 116 - 117
  • [27] Visual word recognition: Spatial attention as a necessary preliminary to semantic processing
    Waechter, Stephanie
    Besner, Derek
    Stolz, Jennifer A.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2009, 63 (04): : 347 - 347
  • [28] Visual attention matters during word recognition: A Bayesian modeling approach
    Phenix, Thierry
    Ginestet, Emilie
    Valdois, Sylviane
    Diard, Julien
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2025,
  • [29] Visual recognition of mirrored letters and the right hemisphere advantage for mirror-invariant object recognition
    Matthew T. Harrison
    Lars Strother
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2018, 25 : 1494 - 1499
  • [30] Visual recognition of mirrored letters and the right hemisphere advantage for mirror-invariant object recognition
    Harrison, Matthew T.
    Strother, Lars
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2018, 25 (04) : 1494 - 1499