Sensory recovery and oral health-related quality of life following tongue reconstruction using non-innervated radial forearm free flaps

被引:4
|
作者
Zhu, Ling [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jinglu [2 ]
Chen, Wenjing [1 ,3 ]
Svensson, Peter [2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Wang, Kelun [2 ,4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Childrens Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Hlth, Dept Stomatol,Sch Med, Hangzhou 310052, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp Stomatol, Inst Stomatol, Orofacial Pain & TMD Res Unit, 136 Hanzhong Rd, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp Stomatol, Inst Stomatol, Dept Orthodont, 136 Hanzhong Rd, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
[4] Aarhus Univ, Sch Dent & Oral Hlth, Sect Orofacial Pain & Jaw Funct, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Malmo Univ, Fac Odontol, Dept Orofacial Pain & Jaw Funct, Malmo, Sweden
[6] Scandinavian Ctr Orofacial Neurosci SCON, Malmo, Sweden
[7] Aalborg Univ, Ctr Sensory Motor Interact SMI, Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Sensory recovery; Tongue reconstruction; Non-innervated radial forearm free flap; Hemiglossectomy; Quantitative sensory testing; Oral Health Impact Profile; INTRAORAL RECONSTRUCTION; ISLAND FLAPS; SENSATION; HEMIGLOSSECTOMY; REINNERVATION; SENSIBILITY; CAVITY; NERVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105471
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study aimed to monitor the recovery of somatosensory function and oral health-related quality of life after tongue reconstruction using a non-innervated radial forearm free flap (RFFF). Methods: Twenty patients (9 men, age: 42-67 years) underwent tongue reconstruction with non-innervated RFFFs, and twenty age-and sex-matched controls were included in this study. Quantitative sensory testing (QST), including cold, warm, and mechanical detection thresholds (CDT, WDT, MDT); cold, heat, and mechanical pain thresholds (CPT, HPT, MPT); and static two-point, sharp/blunt, and direction discrimination (S2-PD, S/BD, DD) were determined 9 months and 18 months after surgery on the surgical (9 M, 18 M) and contralateral sides (9Mc, 18Mc). Oral Health Impact Profile-49 (OHIP-49) was used to determine the oral-related quality of life of participants. Results: All parameters showed significantly lower sensitivity at 9 M and 18 M (p < 0.001) compared to those for the controls and the contralateral side, except for DD (p = 0.101). In addition, the parameters showed a significant decrease in sensitivity for 9Mc and 18Mc (p <= 0.043) compared to those for the controls, except for MPT, HPT, S/SD, and DD (p >= 0.453). Findings on WDT, MPT, S2-PD, and DD (p <= 0.046) indicated significantly higher somatosensory function at 18 M than that at 9 M. MDT and MPT (p <= 0.038) showed significantly higher sensitivity at 18Mc than at 9Mc. Scores for all dimensions of OHIP-49 were significantly higher in patients (decrease in quality of life, p <= 0.002) than in controls, except for physical discomfort (p = 0.51). However, the scores were significantly higher at 18 M than at 9 M (p <= 0.011), except for handicap (p = 0.36). Postoperative chemotherapy was significantly correlated with impaired thermal sensitivity of the flaps (WDT, p = 0.049). Conclusion: The present findings showed significant impairment in somatosensory function on both the surgical and contralateral sides of patients with RFFFs. However, a significant increase in somatosensory function was observed on both sides over time. Somatosensory disturbances observed after surgery were associated with poor oral health-related quality of life.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Exploring dimensions of oral health-related quality of life using experts' opinions
    John, Mike T.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2007, 16 (04) : 697 - 704
  • [22] Non-surgical periodontal therapy improves oral health-related quality of life
    Wong, Ruby M. S.
    Ng, Sam K. S.
    Corbet, Esmonde F.
    Leung, W. Keung
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2012, 39 (01) : 53 - 61
  • [23] Comparison of Clinical Results and Quality-of-Life in Tongue Cancer Patients Undergoing Submental Island Flap and Radial Forearm Free Flap Reconstruction
    Zhang, Jun
    Wang, Yujing
    Han, Xiaoxue
    Chen, Huiqiao
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 78 (09) : 1639 - 1644
  • [24] Predictors of health-related quality of life recovery following laparoscopic simple, radical and donor nephrectomy
    Wiesenthal, Joshua D.
    Schuler, Trevor D.
    Honey, R. John D'A.
    Pace, Kenneth T.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (04) : 636 - 641
  • [25] Perceived oral health in patients after bariatric surgery using oral health-related quality of life measures
    Karlsson, Lena
    Carlsson, Johanna
    Jenneborg, Kristina
    Kjaeldgaard, Marianne
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 4 (06): : 230 - 240
  • [26] No significant retest effects in oral health-related quality of life assessment using the Oral Health Impact Profile
    John, Mike T.
    Reimann, Daniel R.
    Schierz, Oliver
    Allen, Finbarr
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2008, 66 (03) : 135 - 138
  • [27] Influence of administration method on oral health-related quality of life assessment using the Oral Health Impact Profile
    Reissmann, Daniel R.
    John, Mike T.
    Schierz, Oliver
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2011, 119 (01) : 73 - 78
  • [28] Tongue force, oral health-related quality of life, and sleep index after bruxism management with intraoral devices
    Camara-Souza, Mariana B.
    Figueredo, Olivia M. C.
    Garcia, Renata C. M. Rodrigues
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 124 (04): : 454 - 460
  • [29] Comparison of oral health-related quality of life among endodontic patients with irreversible pulpitis and pulp necrosis using the oral health-related endodontic patient's quality of life scale
    Arifin, Fadil Abdillah
    Matsuda, Yuhei
    Natsir, Nurhayaty
    Kanno, Takahiro
    ODONTOLOGY, 2024, : 844 - 856
  • [30] Oral health-related quality of life following peri-implantitis surgery: A prospective study
    Rustand, Kristin
    Aass, Anne Merete
    Sen, Abhijit
    Koldsland, Odd Carsten
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (08) : 858 - 867