The fibroid registry for outcomes data (FIBROID) for uterine embolization - Short-term outcomes

被引:113
|
作者
Worthington-Kirsch, R
Spies, JB
Myers, ER
Mulgund, J
Mauro, M
Pron, G
Peterson, ED
Goodwin, S
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Ctr Med, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Radiol, Washington, DC USA
[4] Image Guided Surg Associates, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Durham, NC USA
[8] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Radiol Sci, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2005年 / 106卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000165828.68787.a9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the short-term safety of uterine embolization for leiomyomata in a large cohort of patients treated in a variety of clinical settings. Methods: Examining the FIBROID Registry, a multicenter prospective voluntary registry of patients undergoing uterine embolization for leiomyomata, we studied the frequency of adverse events and predictors of adverse events within 30 days of the procedure. We also report on the technical aspects of the procedure, including details of periprocedural care, technique, and short-term recovery. All adverse events were recorded and classified using standard definitions, both in terms of type and severity. Summary statistics were used to describe the data set, and univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine which factors might influence the incidence of adverse events. Results: Of the 3,160 patients enrolled at 72 contributing sites, major in-hospital complications occurred in 0.66%, and postdischarge major events occurred in 4.8% within the first 30 days. The most common adverse event after discharge was inadequate pain relief requiring additional hospital treatment (2.4%). Thirty-one patients required additional surgical intervention within 30 days after treatment, 3 of whom required hysterectomy (0.1%). There were no deaths. Multivariate analysis showed modest increased odds for an adverse event for African Americans, smokers, and those with prior leiomyoma procedures. There were no differences in outcome based on the practice site experience, practice type, or any procedure-related factors. Conclusion: Uterine embolization for leiomyomata is a low-risk procedure with little variability in short-term outcome based on either patient demographics or practice setting.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 59
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Uterine fibroid embolization: Is there a role?
    Sandhu, AK
    Hassan, WY
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (05) : 669 - 670
  • [22] Transradial and Transfemoral Uterine Fibroid Embolization Comparative Study: Technical and Clinical Outcomes
    Nakhaei, Masoud
    Mojtahedi, Alireza
    Faintuch, Salomao
    Sarwar, Ammar
    Brook, Olga R.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (01) : 123 - 129
  • [23] Long-term failure of uterine fibroid embolization
    Huang, JY
    Dugas, A
    Valenti, DA
    Tulandi, T
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 82 : S11 - S11
  • [24] Improving Uterine Fibroid Management on Ghanaian Short-Term Surgical Missions
    Benson, Ryan M.
    Rego, Erica
    Naliboff, Lauren
    Hirday, Rishabh
    Klein, Jessica
    Sifri, Ziad C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2024, 239 (05) : S228 - S228
  • [25] Pregnancy outcomes following treatment for fibroids: uterine fibroid embolization versus laparoscopic myomectomy
    Goldberg, Jay
    Pereira, Leonardo
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 18 (04) : 402 - 406
  • [26] Pregnancy success and outcomes after uterine fibroid embolization: updated review of published literature
    Ludwig, Parker E.
    Huff, Trevor J.
    Shanahan, Meaghan M.
    Stavas, Joseph M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1105):
  • [27] Necrotic fibroid expulsion with intrauterine infection after uterine fibroid embolization
    Messina, M. L.
    Bozzini, N.
    Baracat, E. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2007, 97 (02) : 158 - 159
  • [28] Uterine fibroid embolization: present and future?
    Pelage, JP
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2000, 81 (05): : 483 - 484
  • [29] Current Concepts in Uterine Fibroid Embolization
    Bulman, Julie C.
    Ascher, Susan M.
    Spies, James B.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2012, 32 (06) : 1735 - 1750
  • [30] Is uterine fibroid embolization an alternative to surgery?
    Pelage, J. P.
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2007, 88 (06): : 825 - 826