An assessment of European pig diversity using molecular markers:: Partitioning of diversity among breeds

被引:27
|
作者
Ollivier, L [1 ]
Alderson, L
Gandini, GC
Foulley, JL
Haley, CS
Joosten, R
Rattink, AP
Harlizius, B
Groenen, MAM
Amigues, Y
Boscher, MY
Russell, G
Law, A
Davoli, R
Russo, V
Matassino, D
Désautés, C
Fimland, E
Bagga, M
Delgado, JV
Vega-Pla, JL
Martinez, AM
Ramos, AM
Glodek, P
Meyer, JN
Plastow, GS
Siggens, KW
Archibald, AL
Milan, D
San Cristobal, M
Laval, G
Hammond, K
Cardellino, R
Chevalet, C
机构
[1] INRA, Genet Quantitat & Appl Stn, F-78352 Jouy En Josas, France
[2] Rare Breeds Survival Trust, Shrewsbury SY5 6EJ, Shrops, England
[3] Univ Milan, Dept VSA, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[4] Roslin Inst, Roslin EH25 9PS, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[6] Labogena, F-78352 Jouy En Josas, France
[7] PIC Int Grp, Abingdon OX13 5FE, Oxon, England
[8] FAO, Anim Genet Resources Grp, I-00100 Rome, Italy
[9] Agence Select Porcine, F-75595 Paris 12, France
[10] Anim Genet Inst, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[11] Univ Bologna, DIPROVAL, I-42100 Coviolo Reggio Emilia, Italy
[12] ConsDABI NFP I FAO, I-82100 Benevento, Italy
[13] Univ Cordoba, Fac Vet, Cordoba 14005, Spain
[14] FESSCR, Genet Mol Lab, Cordoba 14071, Spain
[15] Nord Gene Bank Farm Anim, N-1432 As, Norway
[16] Univ Tras Os Montes & Alto Douro, P-5001 Vila Real, Portugal
[17] INRA, Lab Genet Cellulaire, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan, France
[18] Computat & Mol Populat Genet Lab, Bern, Switzerland
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
biodiversity; conservation; genetic marker; pig;
D O I
10.1007/s10592-005-9032-6
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Genetic diversity within and between breeds (and lines) of pigs was investigated. The sample comprised 68 European domestic breeds (and lines), including 29 local breeds, 18 varieties of major international breeds, namely Duroc, Hampshire, Landrace, Large White and Pietrain, and 21 commercial lines either purebred or synthetic, to which the Chinese Meishan and a sample of European wild pig were added. On average 46 animals per breed were sampled (range 12-68). The genetic markers were microsatellites (50 loci) and AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism, 148 loci). The analysis of diversity showed that the local breeds accounted for 56% of the total European between-breed microsatellite diversity, and slightly less for AFLP, followed by commercial lines and international breeds. Conversely, the group of international breeds contributed most to within-breed diversity, followed by commercial lines and local breeds. Individual breed contributions to the overall European between- and within-breed diversity were estimated. The range in between-breed diversity contributions among the 68 breeds was 0.04-3.94% for microsatellites and 0.24-2.94% for AFLP. The within-breed diversity contributions varied very little for both types of markers, but microsatellite contributions were negatively correlated with the between-breed contributions, so care is needed in balancing the two types of contribution when making conservation decisions. By taking into account the risks of extinction of the 29 local breeds, a cryopreservation potential (priority) was estimated for each of them.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 741
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of genetic diversity among sunflower genotypes using microsatellite markers
    Zeinalzadeh-Tabrizi, Hossein
    Haliloglu, Kamil
    Ghaffari, Mehdi
    Hosseinpour, Arash
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 7 (03) : 143 - 152
  • [32] Assessment of genetic diversity among okra genotypes using SSR markers
    Kumar, Sushil
    Parekh, Mithil J.
    Fougat, Ranbir S.
    Patel, Swati K.
    Patel, Chandni B.
    Kumar, Mukesh
    Patel, Babubhai R.
    JOURNAL OF PLANT BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 26 (02) : 172 - 178
  • [33] Assessment of genetic diversity among okra genotypes using SSR markers
    Sushil Kumar
    Mithil J. Parekh
    Ranbir S. Fougat
    Swati K. Patel
    Chandni B. Patel
    Mukesh Kumar
    Babubhai R. Patel
    Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2017, 26 : 172 - 178
  • [34] Assessment of genetic diversity among pigeonpea genotypes using SSR markers
    Singh, Shubhanjana
    Singh, K. N.
    Kant, Rama
    Mehfooz, Sahil
    Dutta, S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND PLANT BREEDING, 2008, 68 (03) : 255 - 260
  • [35] Assessment of genetic diversity among arecanut accessions by using RAPD markers
    Sankaran, M.
    Chandrasekar, P.
    Singh, D. R.
    Damodaran, V.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURE, 2013, 70 (03) : 428 - 430
  • [36] Assessment of genetic diversity among Malnad Gidda, Punganur and Vechur-dwarf cattle breeds of India using microsatellite markers
    Ramesha, K. P.
    Divya, P.
    Rao, Akhila
    Basavaraju, M.
    Jeyakumar, S.
    Das, D. N.
    Kataktalware, Mukund A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2016, 86 (02): : 186 - 191
  • [37] Assessment of genetic diversity among different population of five Swertia species by using molecular and phytochemical markers
    Kaur, Prabhjot
    Pandey, Devendra Kumar
    Gupta, R. C.
    Dey, Abhijit
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2019, 138
  • [38] Assessment of genetic diversity among wheat somaclonal variants lines using morphological traits and molecular markers
    Abouzied, Hanaa Mahdy
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2011, 10 (66): : 14851 - 14861
  • [39] Assessment of genetic diversity among faba bean genotypes using agro-morphological and molecular markers
    Ammar, Megahed H.
    Alghamdi, Salem S.
    Migdadi, Hussein M.
    Khan, Muhammad A.
    El-Harty, Ehab H.
    Al-Faifi, Sulieman A.
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 22 (03) : 340 - 350
  • [40] Molecular diversity assessment among the pomegranate genotypes belonging to diverse genetic background using microsatellite markers
    Nusrat Perveen
    Sarvamangala S. Cholin
    Kulapati Hipparagi
    G. Prabhuling
    B. N. S. Murthy
    Dadapeer Peerjade
    Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2023, 45