Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) Aftercare Attendance and Attrition
被引:9
|
作者:
Hochberg, Lisa S.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Monash Univ, Ctr Obes Res & Educ, Alfred Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
Monash Univ, Sch Psychol, Clayton, Vic 3168, AustraliaMonash Univ, Ctr Obes Res & Educ, Alfred Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
Hochberg, Lisa S.
[1
,2
]
Murphy, Kylie D.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Monash Univ, Ctr Obes Res & Educ, Alfred Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
Australian Catholic Univ, Sch Psychol, Melbourne, Vic 3065, AustraliaMonash Univ, Ctr Obes Res & Educ, Alfred Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
Murphy, Kylie D.
[1
,3
]
O'Brien, Paul E.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Monash Univ, Ctr Obes Res & Educ, Alfred Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3004, AustraliaMonash Univ, Ctr Obes Res & Educ, Alfred Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
O'Brien, Paul E.
[1
]
Brennan, Leah
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Monash Univ, Ctr Obes Res & Educ, Alfred Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
Australian Catholic Univ, Sch Psychol, Melbourne, Vic 3065, AustraliaMonash Univ, Ctr Obes Res & Educ, Alfred Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
Brennan, Leah
[1
,3
]
机构:
[1] Monash Univ, Ctr Obes Res & Educ, Alfred Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Psychol, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[3] Australian Catholic Univ, Sch Psychol, Melbourne, Vic 3065, Australia
Regular aftercare attendance following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is associated with greater weight loss and fewer post-surgical complications. Despite high reported rates of attrition from LAGB aftercare, the reasons for non-attendance have not been previously explored. The present study aimed to explore patient-reported barriers to LAGB aftercare attendance, and the perceived helpfulness of potential attrition-reducing strategies, in both regular attendees and non-attendees of aftercare. One hundred and seventy-nine participants (107 regular attendees and 72 non-attendees) completed a semi-structured questionnaire, assessing barriers to attrition (101 items) and usefulness of attrition prevention strategies (14 items). Findings indicate that both regular attendees and non-attendees experience multiple barriers to aftercare attendance. Non-attendees generally reported that barriers had a greater impact on their aftercare attendance. There was evidence for some level of acceptability for attrition-reducing strategies suggesting that LAGB patients may be receptive to such strategies. Current findings highlight the importance of assessing barriers to treatment in both attendees and non-attendees. It is proposed that addressing barriers that differentiate non-attendees from attendees may be most effective in reducing attrition from aftercare.