The private sector's role in public sector genetically engineered crop projects

被引:7
|
作者
Potrykus, Ingo [1 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
As we were determined to ensure an impact from our work; we had to develop it ourselves. When proof-of-concept was established; this was also the end of any financial support from the public sector. Financial support in academia is for scientific novelty. There was (and is) no mechanism in the public domain for support in either product development or deregulation; for the simple fact that no scientific novelty can be expected. Fortunately; visionary organisations (The Rockefeller Foundation and USAID) supported some initial work; but all this would not have rescued the transition into the product development phase and the extension into the deregulation phase; as not only were funds a problem; but expertise was absent. The public sector International Rice Research Institute (IRRI); Philippines; volunteered to take responsibility for variety development. But IRRI had no experience with GM-product development and was initially as naive as the inventors in this respect. In that situation ‘Golden Rice’ was very much in danger of remaining an academic exercise – unless something unusual would happen. The unusual approach we finally took was to search for support for the humanitarian project in the private sector;
D O I
10.1016/j.nbt.2010.07.006
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
There is widespread interest within academia to work on public good genetically engineered (GE) projects to the benefit of the poor, especially to use GE-technology to contribute to food security. Not a single product from this work has reached the market. The major cause is GE-regulation, which prevents use of the technology for public good beyond proof-of-concept (Potrykus, I. (2010) Lessons from the Humanitarian Golden Rice project: Regulation prevents development of public good GE-products (these Proceedings)). There is, however, another key problem responsible for the lack of deployment of public good GE-plants: the public sector is incompetent and disinterested for work beyond proof-of-concept, and has neither capability nor funding to develop GE-plant products and introduce them to growers and consumers. The private sector has the expertise for both and in the right circumstances can be ready to support the public sector in public good enterprises. Public-private-partnerships are the best solution so far, to advance exploitation of GE-technology to the benefit of the poor. Public-private-partnerships are viable, however, only, if there is mutual interest from the private sector and initiative and funding from the public sector.
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 581
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条