Differing effects of 2 active dried yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) strains on ruminal acidosis and methane production in nonlactating dairy cows

被引:97
|
作者
Chung, Y. -H. [1 ]
Walker, N. D. [2 ]
McGinn, S. M. [1 ]
Beauchemin, K. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Res Ctr, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
[2] Lallemand Anim Nutr, Montreal, PQ H4P 2T4, Canada
关键词
active dried yeast; ruminal acidosis; enteric methane emissions; sulfur hexafluoride tracer gas technique; BEEF-CATTLE; IN-VITRO; FERMENTATION; RUMEN; PH; DEGRADATION; EMISSIONS; CULTURE; FIBER; DIETS;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2010-3277
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Fifteen ruminally cannulated, nonlactating Holstein cows were used to measure the effects of 2 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, fed as active dried yeasts, on ruminal pH and fermentation and enteric methane (CH4) emissions. Nonlactating cows were blocked by total duration (h) that their ruminal pH was below 5.8 during a 6-d pre-experimental period. Within each block, cows were randomly assigned to control (no yeast), yeast strain 1 (Levucell SC), or yeast strain 2 (a novel strain selected for enhanced in vitro fiber degradation), with both strains (Lallemand Animal Nutrition, Montreal, QC, Canada) providing 1 x 10(10) cfu/head per day. Cows were fed once daily a total mixed ration consisting of a 50: 50 forage to concentrate ratio (dry matter basis). The yeast strains were dosed via the rumen cannula daily at the time of feeding. During the 35-d experiment, ruminal pH was measured continuously for 7 d (d 22 to 28) by using an indwelling system, and CH4 gas was measured for 4 d (d 32 to 35) using the sulfur hexafluoride tracer gas technique (with halters and yokes). Rumen contents were sampled on 2 d (d 22 and 26) at 0, 3, and 6 h after feeding. Dry matter intake, body weight, and apparent total-tract digestibility of nutrients were not affected by yeast feeding. Strain 2 decreased the average daily minimum (5.35 vs. 5.65 or 5.66), mean (5.98 vs. 6.24 or 6.34), and maximum ruminal pH (6.71 vs. 6.86 or 6.86), and prolonged the time that ruminal pH was below 5.8 (7.5 vs. 3.3 or 1.0 h/d) compared with the control or strain 1, respectively. The molar percentage of acetate was lower and that of propionate was greater in the ruminal fluid of cows receiving strain 2 compared with cows receiving no yeast or strain 1. Enteric CH4 production adjusted for intake of dry matter or gross energy, however, did not differ between either yeast strain compared with the control but it tended to be reduced by 10% when strain 2 was compared with strain 1. The study shows that different strains of S. cerevisiae fed as active dried yeasts vary in their ability to modify the rumen fermentative pattern in nonlactating dairy cows. Because strain 2 tended (when compared with strain 1) to lower CH4 emissions but increase the risk of acidosis, it may be prudent to further evaluate this strain in cattle fed high-forage diets, for which the risk of acidosis is low but CH4 emissions are high.
引用
收藏
页码:2431 / 2439
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative examination of the biological effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast cultures in dairy cows
    Konyves, Laszlo
    Jurkovich, Viktor
    Tirian, Attila
    Tegzes, Laszlone
    Febel, Hedvig
    Kutasi, Jozsef
    Brydl, Endre
    MAGYAR ALLATORVOSOK LAPJA, 2007, 129 (07) : 400 - 409
  • [22] Effects of live yeast culture supplementation (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and nutritional management on ruminal pH and fermentation in early lactation dairy cows
    Al Ibrahim, R. M.
    Gath, V. P.
    McCarney, C.
    Duffy, P.
    Mulligan, F. J.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 : 872 - 872
  • [23] Effects of active dried yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), a non-ionic surfactant, or their combination on gas production, rumen microbial fermentation and methane production in vitro
    Benchaar, Chaouki
    Hassanat, Fadi
    Yang, W. Z.
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 307
  • [24] Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fermentation Product on Ruminal Fermentation, Blood Metabolites, and Milk Production in Dairy Cows
    Aoki, Naoto
    Zhang Yanli
    Kanda, Syuhei
    Kurokawa, Yuzo
    Sultana, Halima
    Itabashi, Hisao
    JARQ-JAPAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2021, 55 (03): : 265 - 271
  • [25] Construction of Novel Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains for Bioethanol Active Dry Yeast (ADY) Production
    Zheng, Daoqiong
    Zhang, Ke
    Gao, Kehui
    Liu, Zewei
    Zhang, Xing
    Li, Ou
    Sun, Jianguo
    Zhang, Xiaoyang
    Du, Fengguang
    Sun, Peiyong
    Qu, Aimin
    Wu, Xuechang
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [26] Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Culture on Ruminal Fermentation, Blood Metabolism, and Performance of High-Yield Dairy Cows
    Sun, Xiaoge
    Wang, Yue
    Wang, Erdan
    Zhang, Shu
    Wang, Qianqian
    Zhang, Yan
    Wang, Yajing
    Cao, Zhijun
    Yang, Hongjian
    Wang, Wei
    Li, Shengli
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [27] Effects of a live yeast culture and enzymes on in vitro ruminal fermentation and milk production of dairy cows
    Kung, L
    Kreck, EM
    Tung, RS
    Hession, AO
    Sheperd, AC
    Cohen, MA
    Swain, HE
    Leedle, JAZ
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1997, 80 (09) : 2045 - 2051
  • [28] COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE LABORATORY SELECTED AND ACTIVE DRIED SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE YEAST CULTURE IN BIOTECHNOLOGY OF THE BRANDY PRODUCTION
    Bayraktar, V. N.
    BIOLOGICAL BULLETIN OF BOGDAN CHMELNITSKIY MELITOPOL STATE PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY, 2015, 5 (01): : 48 - 60
  • [29] Effects of dietary supplementation of active dried yeast on fecal methanogenic archaea diversity in dairy cows
    Jin, Dingxing
    Kang, Kun
    Wang, Hongze
    Wang, Zhisheng
    Xue, Bai
    Wang, Lizhi
    Xu, Feng
    Peng, Quanhui
    ANAEROBE, 2017, 44 : 78 - 86
  • [30] A meta-analysis of the effects of feeding yeast culture produced by anaerobic fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on milk production of lactating dairy cows
    Poppy, G. D.
    Rabiee, A. R.
    Lean, I. J.
    Sanchez, W. K.
    Dorton, K. L.
    Morley, P. S.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2012, 95 (10) : 6027 - 6041