The impact of R&D workforce diversity on firm's performance in internal and external R&D

被引:7
|
作者
Bae, Sung Joo [1 ]
Han, Sangyun [2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Sch Business, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Daejeon Univ, Dept Int Commerce, Daejeon, South Korea
关键词
External knowledge; Diversity; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; TOP MANAGEMENT; GENDER DIVERSITY; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; TEAM DIVERSITY; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; INNOVATION STRATEGY; MODERATING ROLE; CAPABILITIES;
D O I
10.1108/EJIM-09-2018-0204
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose How should managers organize their R&D workforce in order to maximize the benefit of internal R&D and R&D outsourcing strategy? The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of R&D workforce diversity on firms' performance when the firms use internal and external knowledge acquired from R&D outsourcing. Diversity of R&D employees as R&D workforce can enable firms to utilize the knowledge of internal R&D and internalize the external knowledge. Design/methodology/approach Panel data analysis with fixed effects is used. The authors conduct hierarchical multiple regression analyses to test the moderating effect of R&D workforce diversity with 10,401 data from Korean manufacturing firms. Findings This study finds out that age and education diversity of R&D workforce have positive moderating effects on the relationship between the R&D outsourcing and firm performance. In contrast, internal R&D is negatively associated with firm performance when the age diversity of R&D workforce increases. The results point to the significant role of R&D workforce diversity in R&D unit since firms often use both internal R&D and external R&D. Practical implications - For practical implications to be more effective, CEOs and managers of firms should employ differentiated approaches to manage the diversity of R&D workforce based on whether they primarily focus on their internal R&D or utilize external R&D. Originality/value This research extends recent efforts to better understand the effect of organizational diversity on the firms' performance when firms use internal R&D and R&D outsourcing strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 473
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence
    Hung, Kuang-Peng
    Chou, Christine
    TECHNOVATION, 2013, 33 (10-11) : 368 - 380
  • [32] Mining external R&D
    Porter, Alan L.
    Newman, Nils C.
    TECHNOVATION, 2011, 31 (04) : 171 - 176
  • [33] Corporate R&D and firm efficiency: evidence from Europe’s top R&D investors
    Subal C. Kumbhakar
    Raquel Ortega-Argilés
    Lesley Potters
    Marco Vivarelli
    Peter Voigt
    Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2012, 37 : 125 - 140
  • [34] Internal and external R&D: A sample selection approach
    Piga, CA
    Vivarelli, M
    OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2004, 66 (04) : 457 - 482
  • [35] Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing
    Veugelers, R
    RESEARCH POLICY, 1997, 26 (03) : 303 - 315
  • [36] Corporate R&D and firm efficiency: evidence from Europe's top R&D investors
    Kumbhakar, Subal C.
    Ortega-Argiles, Raquel
    Potters, Lesley
    Vivarelli, Marco
    Voigt, Peter
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2012, 37 (02) : 125 - 140
  • [37] R&D Indicators of a Firm as Predictors for Predicting Firm Performance
    Shin, Young Geun
    Park, Sang Sung
    Jang, Dong Sik
    INFORMATION-AN INTERNATIONAL INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2012, 15 (02): : 577 - 596
  • [38] BY THE NUMBERS: GLOBALIZATION OF THE R&D WORKFORCE
    Brown, Alan S.
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 135 (01) : 32 - 33
  • [39] The Dynamic Impact of Exporting on Firm R&D Investment
    Maican, Florin G.
    Orth, Matilda
    Roberts, Mark J.
    Vuong, Van Anh
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2023, 21 (04) : 1318 - 1362
  • [40] Corporate decision-making in R&D outsourcing and the impact on internal R&D employment intensity
    Teirlinck, Peter
    Dumont, Michel
    Spithoven, Andre
    INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2010, 19 (06) : 1741 - 1768