Molecular-Level Kinetic Modeling of Resid Pyrolysis

被引:27
|
作者
Horton, Scott R. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Linzhou [3 ]
Hou, Zhen [1 ,2 ]
Bennett, Craig A. [1 ,2 ]
Klein, Michael T. [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Suoqi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Energy Inst, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[2] Univ Delaware, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[3] China Univ Petr, State Key Lab Heavy Oil Proc, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
关键词
MONTE-CARLO-SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1021/ie5041572
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
A Molecular-level kinetic model of heavy ii pyrolysis was developed for a Venezuelan vacuum residue. Model development proceeded in three major steps: creation of a molecular description of the feedstoCk, generation of a reaction network, and model solution and parameter tuning. The feedstock composition, as described in previous work [Zhang et al. Energy Fuels 2014, 28, 1736-1749]) was modeled in terms of probability density functions (PDFs) Of three finite attribute groups (385 cores, 2 intercore linkages, and 194 side chains) and a PDF for each of a cluster-size and binding site distribution. These attributes, or molecule building blocks, represent more than OA M molecules An attribute reaction network was developed using the fundamental reaction chemistry for resid pyrolysis including 6274 reactions that fall into one of 11 reaction families. To make solution time tractable, we used attribute reaction modeling (ARM) which constrained-the number Of material balances to the number of attributes and irreducible molecules in the system or 2841 total equations. Therefore, reactor output was a Set of reaction-altered attribute PDFs and molar amounts of irreducible molecule. The quantitative, molecular composition of the reactor outlet was obtained through the juxtaposition of the final attribute PDFs. The properties of both the sampled molecules and the char fraction were obtained using quantitative structure property relationships (QSPRs). The kinetic model was tuned using a least-squares objective function comparing the model predictions to measurements from the-molecular to bulk-property level for all teleyant boiling point fractions. The tuned model showed reasonably good, agreement with the experimental measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:4226 / 4235
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modeling heterogeneous catalysis with molecular-level understanding
    Gagliardi, Laura
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 258
  • [22] MODELING THE THIOPHENE HDS REACTION ON A MOLECULAR-LEVEL
    DIEMANN, E
    WEBER, T
    MULLER, A
    JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS, 1994, 148 (01) : 288 - 303
  • [23] Molecular-level kinetic model for naphtha catalytic reforming
    Lyu, Wenjin
    Zhang, Linzhou
    Zhao, Suoqi
    Shi, Quan
    Xu, Chunming
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 256
  • [24] Molecular-level modeling of the viscoelasticity of crosslinked polymers
    Ploehn, HJ
    Simon, PP
    XIITH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON RHEOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 238 - 239
  • [25] Reducing molecular-level kinetic models to decrease solution times
    Agarwal, Pratyush
    Klein, Michael
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 254
  • [26] Modeling QCA defects at molecular-level in combinational circuits
    Momenzadeh, M
    Ottavi, M
    Lombardi, F
    DFT 2005: 20TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DEFECT AND FAULT TOLERANCE IN VLSI SYSTEMS, 2005, : 208 - 216
  • [27] Molecular-Level Modeling of Interfacial Phenomena in Boiling Processes
    Carey, V. P.
    EXPERIMENTAL HEAT TRANSFER, 2013, 26 (2-3) : 296 - 327
  • [28] Molecular-level modeling of heterogeneous chemistry on aerosol surfaces
    Paesani, Francesco
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 242
  • [29] Heterogeneous chemistry on aerosols: Molecular-level modeling and simulation
    Paesani, Francesco
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 244
  • [30] Application advances of molecular level reaction kinetic modeling for catalytic cracking/pyrolysis process
    Liu D.
    Bai Y.
    Zhang L.
    Zhang Y.
    Zhao L.
    Gao J.
    Xu C.
    Huagong Jinzhan/Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40 (04): : 2082 - 2091