Drug-coated balloon angioplasty: predicting outcomes based on different patterns of drug-eluting stent restenosis

被引:14
|
作者
Wang, Xi [1 ]
Lu, Wenjie [1 ]
Wang, Xule [1 ]
Pan, Liang [1 ]
Fu, Wanrong [1 ]
Liu, Qiankun [1 ]
Han, Zhanying [1 ]
Sun, Guoju [1 ]
Qin, Xiaofei [1 ]
Li, Ran [1 ]
Zheng, Xiaolin [1 ]
Shan, Yingguang [1 ]
Qiu, Chunguang [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
In-stent restenosis; Drug-coated balloon; Drug-eluting stent; Recurrent in-stent restenosis; METAANALYSIS; CATHETER; TRIAL; MULTICENTER; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1007/s10554-019-01681-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Although drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty is an effective therapy for drug-eluting stent- in stent restenosis (DES-ISR) after coronary stenting, recurrent ISR after DCB angioplasty still occurs. Different patterns of DES-ISR responding to DCB are largely unknown. This study sought to assess outcomes of different patterns of DES-ISR treated with DCB. From December 2014 to December 2016, a total of 160 DES-ISR lesions treated with DCB were retrospectively evaluated. Restenosis patterns were classified into two groups according to Mehran classification: focal, defined as < 10 mm, 58 lesions (36.3%); non-focal, which were diffuse, proliferative, or obstructive, 102 lesions (63.7%). The primary endpoint was binary restenosis rate at 9-month angiographic follow-up. Secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 24-month follow-up. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Angiographic follow-up rate was 93.7% (93.1% in the focal group and 94.1% in the non-focal group). The focal group had a lower recurrent restenosis rate compared to the non-focal group (3.7% vs. 33.3%, respectively; P = 0.003) at an average angiographic follow-up of 10 (10.4 +/- 6.2) months. There was no difference in MACE between the two groups (6.9% vs. 11.8%, respectively; P = 0.70) at (22.7 +/- 9.1) months clinical follow-up. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, focal pattern (OR 13.033; 95% CI 2.441-69.573, P = 0.003) and post-procedure DS% (OR 1.142; 95% CI 1.070-1.218, P = 0.000) were predictive factors of binary restenosis after DCB angioplasty. On multivariate analysis, focal pattern of ISR was a predictive factor of MACE (OR 0.260; 95% CI 0.071-0.959, P = 0.043), and diabetes mellitus (DM) was an independent predictor of MACE after DCB angioplasty (OR 5.045; 95% CI 1.179-21.590, P = 0.029). The present study suggests that DCB provides much better clinical, angiographic outcomes in patients with focal DES-ISR than non-focal DES-ISR.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 178
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Cost-effectiveness of drug-coated balloon angioplasty and drug-eluting stent implantation for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis
    Dorenkamp, M.
    Leber, A.
    Sohns, C.
    Boldt, L.
    Roser, M.
    Kleber, F.
    Haverkamp, W.
    Bonaventura, K.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 33 : 840 - 841
  • [12] Primary Angioplasty With Hybrid Approach Using Drug-Eluting Stent and Drug-Coated Balloon
    Kannan, Kalyanaraman
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (16) : S295 - S297
  • [13] Comparison between drug-coated balloon angioplasty and second-generation drug-eluting stent placement for the treatment of in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation
    Kang, In Sook
    Shehata, Islam
    Shin, Dong-Ho
    Kim, Jung-Sun
    Kim, Byeong-Keuk
    Ko, Young-Guk
    Choi, Donghoon
    Jang, Yangsoo
    Hong, Myeong-Ki
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2016, 31 (09) : 1405 - 1411
  • [14] Comparison between drug-coated balloon angioplasty and second-generation drug-eluting stent placement for the treatment of in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation
    In Sook Kang
    Islam Shehata
    Dong-Ho Shin
    Jung-Sun Kim
    Byeong-Keuk Kim
    Young-Guk Ko
    Donghoon Choi
    Yangsoo Jang
    Myeong-Ki Hong
    Heart and Vessels, 2016, 31 : 1405 - 1411
  • [15] DRUG-COATED BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY VERSUS DRUG-ELUTING STENT IMPLANTATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF BARE-METAL AND DRUG-ELUTING STENT RESTENOSIS: RESULTS FROM THE DAEDALUS STUDY
    Giacoppo, D.
    Alfonso, F.
    Kastrati, A.
    Byrne, R. A.
    HEART, 2020, 106 : A11 - A11
  • [16] Difference in clinical outcomes of drug-coated balloon between patients with early and late drug-eluting stent restenosis
    Kuramitsu, S.
    Masuda, H.
    Domei, T.
    Hyodo, M.
    Shirai, S.
    Ando, K.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 1364 - 1364
  • [17] Comparison of drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloon for the treatment of drug-eluting coronary stent restenosis: A randomized RESTORE trial
    Wong, Yiu Tung Anthony
    Kang, Do-Yoon
    Lee, Jin Bae
    Rha, Seung-Woon
    Hong, Young Joon
    Shin, Eun-Seok
    Her, Sung-Ho
    Nam, Chang Wook
    Chung, Woo-Young
    Kim, Moo Hyun
    Lee, Cheol Hyun
    Lee, Pil Hyung
    Ahn, Jung-Min
    Kang, Soo-Jin
    Lee, Seung-Whan
    Kim, Young-Hak
    Lee, Cheol Whan
    Park, Seong-Wook
    Park, Duk-Woo
    Park, Seung-Jung
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 197 : 35 - 42
  • [18] Comparison of 7-Year, Real-World Clinical Outcomes between Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients with Drug-Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis
    Kim, Minsu
    Jang, Albert Youngwoo
    Lee, Joonpyo
    Seo, Jeongduk
    Shin, Yong Hoon
    Oh, Pyung Chun
    Suh, Soon Yong
    Lee, Kyounghoon
    Kang, Woong Chol
    Han, Seung-Hwan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (13)
  • [19] Drug-Eluting Balloon Angioplasty for Carotid In-Stent Restenosis
    Liistro, Francesco
    Porto, Italo
    Grotti, Simone
    Ventoruzzo, Giorgio
    Vergallo, Rocco
    Bellandi, Guido
    Bolognese, Leonardo
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2012, 19 (06) : 729 - 733
  • [20] Comparison of drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in patients with drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis: Insight from randomized controlled trials
    Liu, Wenhao
    Wang, Shaohua
    Xu, Chengzhang
    Zhang, Haifeng
    Lin, Yongqing
    Chen, Yangxin
    Wang, Jingfeng
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (16) : C116 - C116