Mitigation of environmental impacts of beef cattle production in southern Brazil - Evaluation using farm-based life cycle assessment

被引:41
|
作者
Dick, Milene [1 ]
da Silva, Marcelo Abreu [2 ]
Dewes, Homero [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Ctr Res Agribusiness, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Agr & Life Sci, Dept Forage & Agrometeorol, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Inst Biosci, Dept Biophys, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
Global warming; Grassland restoration; LCA; Rotational grazing; Soil carbon stocks; Sustainable intensification; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; SOIL CARBON STOCKS; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; MILK-PRODUCTION; WESTERN CANADA; WHITE CLOVER; DAIRY; SEQUESTRATION; FOOTPRINT; PASTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.087
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Numerous mitigation strategies have been proposed in order to reduce environmental impacts from beef cattle production. In this sense, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of additive changes in the animal and pasture management of a beef cattle production system typical of south Brazil (baseline scenario BS), in terms of climate change, land use and fossil depletion. These changes included: increasing the forage production; improving the forage quality; introducing legumes to replace nitrogen fertilization; improving the reproductive rates and; increasing the forage utilization efficiency. It was also considered the stabilization of the soil carbon (C) stocks in a long-term perspective. In BS was estimated, per kg of live weight gain, the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission of 22.5 kg of CO2 equivalents; the land use of 234.8 m(2)a and; 0.004 kg of oil equivalents in fossil depletion. Changes in forage production and quality resulted in GHG emissions equivalent to 7.8-20.7% of the BS and, to 0.5-1.2% of the BS with reproductive animal improvements. Land use reduces 9.4-30.6 times with these changes. The introduction of legumes to replace the nitrogen fertilizers engendered negative values of fossil depletion. The intensification of pasture utilization results in GHG emissions corresponding to 0.5% of the BS, and in a land use 32 times lower. Considering the long-term stabilization of soil C stocks, the systems that received nutritional and reproductive improvements presented reductions of GHG emissions from 2.5 to 3.2 times. A sensitivity analysis indicated the possibility of all short term improved scenarios become net sinks of C if gradual increments of root/shoot ratios in the range of values suggested by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for Pampa Biome were applied. The scenarios confirm the hypothesis that productive improvements and environmental protection are not contradictory, and highlight the importance of biomass C dynamics and regional peculiarities in mitigation of environmental impacts from forage-livestock systems. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 67
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Environmental life cycle assessment and social impacts of bioethanol production in Thailand
    Papong, Seksan
    Rewlay-ngoen, Chantima
    Itsubo, Norihiro
    Malakul, Pomthong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 157 : 254 - 266
  • [42] Assessment of the Environmental Impacts of a Wind Farm in Central Greece during its Life Cycle
    Abeliotis, Konstadinos
    Pactiti, Despina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH, 2014, 4 (03): : 580 - 585
  • [43] Does the Use of the Yeast Probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae Actisaf Sc 47 Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Beef Cattle? A Study Based on Life Cycle Assessment
    Salah, Nizar
    Legendre, Heloise
    Paiva, Erika
    Duclos, Julie
    Briche, Maxime
    Colbalchini, Florine
    Gac, Armelle
    Kerihuel, Thomas
    Boute, Celine Garat
    ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (21):
  • [44] Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of European beef production systems based on a farm-level optimization model
    Kokemohr, Lennart
    Escobar, Neus
    Mertens, Alexandre
    Mosnier, Claire
    Pirlo, Giacomo
    Veysset, Patrick
    Kuhn, Till
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 379
  • [45] Environmental impacts and resource use of Australian beef and lamb exported to the USA determined using life cycle assessment
    Wiedemann, Stephen
    McGahan, Eugene
    Murphy, Caoilinn
    Yan, Ming-Jia
    Henry, Beverley
    Thoma, Greg
    Ledgard, Stewart
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 94 : 67 - 75
  • [46] Microalgal biomass production pathways: evaluation of life cycle environmental impacts
    Zaimes, George G.
    Khanna, Vikas
    BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS, 2013, 6
  • [47] Microalgal biomass production pathways: evaluation of life cycle environmental impacts
    George G Zaimes
    Vikas Khanna
    Biotechnology for Biofuels, 6
  • [48] Coupled life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis for mitigation of environmental impacts and enhancement of energy efficiency in grape production
    Mohseni, Payam
    Borghei, Ali Mohammad
    Khanali, Majid
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 : 937 - 947
  • [49] Assessment of grazing management on farm greenhouse gas intensity of beef production systems in the Canadian Prairies using life cycle assessment
    Alemu, Aldilu W.
    Janzen, Henry
    Little, Shannan
    Hao, Xiying
    Thompson, Donald J.
    Baron, Vern
    Iwaasa, Alan
    Beauchemin, Karen A.
    Krobel, Roland
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2017, 158 : 1 - 13
  • [50] Environmental Impact assessment of a semi-intensive beef cattle production in Brazil's Northeast
    Willers, Camila Daniele
    Maranduba, Henrique Leonardo
    de Almeida Neto, Jose Adolfo
    Rodrigues, Luciano Brito
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (04): : 516 - 524