Use of pharmacoeconomics information - Report of the ISPOR Task Force on use of pharmacoeconomic/health economic information in health-care decision making

被引:80
|
作者
Drummond, M [1 ]
Brown, R
Fendrick, AM
Fullerton, P
Neumann, P
Taylor, R
Barbieri, M
机构
[1] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] MEDTAP Int, London, England
[3] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[7] Innovus Res, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, Scotland
关键词
cost-effectiveness analysis; decision making; guidelines; implementation;
D O I
10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.64245.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: Despite the growing number of pharmacoeconomic (PE)/health economic (HE) studies, very little is known about their use by decision makers. The objectives of the Task Force were to ensure that the good research practices of PE/HE studies pay attention to the needs of health-care decision makers and to develop a "toolbox" for the health-care decision maker wanting to interpret and use PE/HE studies. Methods: The membership of the Task Force consisted of individuals involved in making decisions about the availability or use of medicines and researchers into the use of economic evaluations. The group communicated by E-mail and face-to-face meetings. A literature review of decision makers' attitudes toward PE/HE studies and published economic evaluation guidelines was undertaken. In addition, a focus group discussion was held with opinion leaders in managed care pharmacy. Results: The literature review identified 16 surveys of decision makers' attitudes toward PE/HE studies and 15 published guidelines that outlined reporting requirements for economic evaluations. These were reviewed and classified. Based on the published literature and comments from decision makers, seven additional reporting requirements for studies were specified. Conclusions: While the Task Force's additional reporting requirements may be helpful to decision makers, they raise a number of issues. These include the feasibility of meeting the additional requirements, whether decision makers should receive more education in economic evaluation, and whether there should be more study of healthcare decision-making procedures themselves.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 416
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making-Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force
    Marsh, Kevin
    IJzerman, Maarten
    Thokala, Praveen
    Baltussen, Rob
    Boysen, Meindert
    Kalo, Zoltan
    Lonngren, Thomas
    Mussen, Filip
    Peacock, Stuart
    Watkins, John
    Devlin, Nancy
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (02) : 125 - 137
  • [22] HEALTH-CARE INFORMATION FRAMEWORK
    SARANUMMI, N
    DEMEESTER, M
    DETALENS, AFP
    HARRINGTON, J
    HEIMLY, V
    GRANDAL, JMD
    TAYLOR, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIO-MEDICAL COMPUTING, 1995, 39 (01): : 99 - 104
  • [23] Use of quality information in decision-making about health and social care services - a systematic review
    Turnpenny, Agnes
    Beadle-Brown, Julie
    HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2015, 23 (04) : 349 - 361
  • [24] The use of health economic information by reimbursement authorities
    Drummond, MF
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 42 : 60 - 63
  • [25] Pharmacoeconomics in health care-decision making: A survey on China health care system
    Yang, L
    Hu, S
    Mulligan, AT
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (06) : 711 - 712
  • [26] INFORMATION SEARCH AND DECISION STRATEGIES AMONG HEALTH-CARE CONSUMERS
    STEWART, DW
    HICKSON, GB
    RATNESHWAR, S
    PECHMANN, C
    ALTEMEIER, W
    ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1985, 12 : 252 - 257
  • [27] AN EXAMINATION OF FACTORS FOR THE STRATEGIC USE OF INFORMATION-SYSTEMS IN THE HEALTH-CARE INDUSTRY
    KIM, KK
    MICHELMAN, JE
    MIS QUARTERLY, 1990, 14 (02) : 201 - 215
  • [28] ECONOMIC DECISION-MAKING IN HEALTH-CARE - A STANDARD APPROACH TO DISCOUNTING HEALTH OUTCOMES
    HILLMAN, AL
    KIM, MS
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1995, 7 (03) : 198 - 205
  • [29] Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1
    Jansen, Jeroen P.
    Fleurence, Rachael
    Devine, Beth
    Itzler, Robbin
    Barrett, Annabel
    Hawkins, Neil
    Lee, Karen
    Boersma, Cornelis
    Annemans, Lieven
    Cappelleri, Joseph C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 417 - 428
  • [30] Defining Elements of Value in Health Care-A Health Economics Approach: An ISPOR Special Task Force Report [3]
    Lakdawalla, Darius N.
    Doshi, Jalpa A.
    Garrison, Louis P., Jr.
    Phelps, Charles E.
    Basu, Anirban
    Danzon, Patricia M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 (02) : 131 - 139