Shared Decision-Making for Lung Cancer Screening

被引:35
|
作者
Nishi, Shawn P. E. [1 ]
Lowenstein, Lisa M. [2 ]
Mendoza, Tito R. [3 ]
Lopez, Maria A. [2 ]
Crocker, Laura C. [2 ]
Sepucha, Karen [4 ]
Niu, Jiangong [2 ]
Volk, Robert J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Dept Internal Med, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Canc Prevent & Populat Sci, Dept Symptom Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Harvard Med Sch, Div Gen Internal Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
decision aids; lung cancer screening; shared decision-making; CARE PROVIDERS; EXPECTATIONS; STATEMENT; BENEFITS; BARRIERS; IMPACT; HARMS; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.041
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces lung cancer mortality, but it also carries a range of risks. Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process of engaging patients in their health care decisions and is a vital component of LCS. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the quality of SDM among patients recently assessed for LCS? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study of screened patients recruited from two academic tertiary care centers in the South Central Region of the United States. Self-reported surveys assessed patient demographics, values related to outcomes of LCS, knowledge, SDM components including receipt of educational materials, and decisional conflict. RESULTS: Recently screened patients (n = 266) possessed varied LCS knowledge, answering an average of 41.4% of questions correctly. Patients valued finding cancer early over concerns about harms. Patients indicated that LCS benefits were presented to them by a health care provider far more often than harms (68.3% vs 20.8%, respectively), and 30.7% reported they received educational materials about LCS during the screening process. One-third of patients had some decisional conflict (33.6%) related to their screening decisions, whereas most patients (86.6%) noted that they were involved in the screening decision as much as they wanted. In multivariate models, non-White race and having less education were related to lower knowledge scores. Non-White patients and former smokers were more likely to be conflicted about the screening decision. Most patients (n = 227 [85.3%]) indicated that a health care provider had discussed smoking cessation or abstinence with them. INTERPRETATION: Among recently screened patients, the quality of decision-making about LCS is highly variable. The low use of educational materials including decision aids and imbalance of conveying benefit vs risk information to patients is concerning. A structured approach using decision aids may assist with providing a balanced presentation of information and may improve the quality of SDM.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 340
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COUNTERPOINT: Can Shared Decision-Making of Physicians and Patients Improve Outcomes in Lung Cancer Screening? No
    Slatore, Christopher G.
    CHEST, 2019, 156 (01) : 15 - 17
  • [42] A Lung Cancer Surgical Mortality Risk-Prediction Algorithm to Inform Lung Cancer Screening Shared Decision-Making
    Roth, Joshua
    Ramsey, Scott
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12 (01) : S242 - S243
  • [43] The TELEhealth Shared decision-making COaching and navigation in Primary carE (TELESCOPE) intervention: a study protocol for delivering shared decision-making for lung cancer screening by patient navigators
    Tan, Naomi Q. P.
    Lowenstein, Lisa M.
    Douglas, Elisa E.
    Silva, Jeanne
    Bershad, Joshua M.
    An, Jinghua
    Shete, Sanjay S.
    Steinberg, Michael B.
    Ferrante, Jeanne M.
    Clark, Elizabeth C.
    Natale-Pereira, Ana
    Sahu, Novneet N.
    Hastings, Shirin E.
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    Volk, Robert J.
    Kinney, Anita Y.
    BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [44] Aiding shared decision making in lung cancer screening: two decision tools
    Sferra, Shelby R.
    Cheng, Joyce S.
    Boynton, Zachary
    DiSesa, Verdi
    Kaiser, Larry R.
    Ma, Grace X.
    Erkmen, Cherie P.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 43 (03) : 673 - 680
  • [45] Lung Cancer Screening Shared Decision Making: Decision-Aid for the Patient
    Grannis, F.
    Ross, S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13 (10) : S962 - S962
  • [46] A Comparison of Web-Based Cancer Risk Calculators That Inform Shared Decision-making for Lung Cancer Screening
    Kates, Frederick R.
    Romero, Ryan
    Jones, Daniel
    Egelfeld, Jacqueline
    Datta, Santanu
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (06) : 1543 - 1552
  • [47] A Comparison of Web-Based Cancer Risk Calculators That Inform Shared Decision-making for Lung Cancer Screening
    Frederick R. Kates
    Ryan Romero
    Daniel Jones
    Jacqueline Egelfeld
    Santanu Datta
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2021, 36 : 1543 - 1552
  • [48] The Effect of a Shared Decision-Making Process on Acceptance of Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Verma, Prateek
    Cohen, Kenneth
    Berke, Ethan M.
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2022, 20 (01) : 89 - 89
  • [49] Shared decision making and cancer screening
    Prazeres, Filipe
    Martins, Elisa
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 56 (03) : 195 - 196
  • [50] Veterans' Lung Cancer Risk Conceptualizations versus Lung Cancer Screening Shared Decision-Making Conversations with Clinicians: A Qualitative Study
    Boudreau, Jacqueline H.
    Bolton, Rendelle E.
    Nunez, Eduardo R.
    Caverly, Tanner J.
    Kearney, Lauren
    Sliwinski, Samantha
    Herbst, Abigail N.
    Slatore, Christopher G.
    Wiener, Renda Soylemez
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2025, 45 (01) : 86 - 96