Shared Decision-Making for Lung Cancer Screening

被引:35
|
作者
Nishi, Shawn P. E. [1 ]
Lowenstein, Lisa M. [2 ]
Mendoza, Tito R. [3 ]
Lopez, Maria A. [2 ]
Crocker, Laura C. [2 ]
Sepucha, Karen [4 ]
Niu, Jiangong [2 ]
Volk, Robert J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Dept Internal Med, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Canc Prevent & Populat Sci, Dept Symptom Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Harvard Med Sch, Div Gen Internal Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
decision aids; lung cancer screening; shared decision-making; CARE PROVIDERS; EXPECTATIONS; STATEMENT; BENEFITS; BARRIERS; IMPACT; HARMS; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.041
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces lung cancer mortality, but it also carries a range of risks. Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process of engaging patients in their health care decisions and is a vital component of LCS. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the quality of SDM among patients recently assessed for LCS? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study of screened patients recruited from two academic tertiary care centers in the South Central Region of the United States. Self-reported surveys assessed patient demographics, values related to outcomes of LCS, knowledge, SDM components including receipt of educational materials, and decisional conflict. RESULTS: Recently screened patients (n = 266) possessed varied LCS knowledge, answering an average of 41.4% of questions correctly. Patients valued finding cancer early over concerns about harms. Patients indicated that LCS benefits were presented to them by a health care provider far more often than harms (68.3% vs 20.8%, respectively), and 30.7% reported they received educational materials about LCS during the screening process. One-third of patients had some decisional conflict (33.6%) related to their screening decisions, whereas most patients (86.6%) noted that they were involved in the screening decision as much as they wanted. In multivariate models, non-White race and having less education were related to lower knowledge scores. Non-White patients and former smokers were more likely to be conflicted about the screening decision. Most patients (n = 227 [85.3%]) indicated that a health care provider had discussed smoking cessation or abstinence with them. INTERPRETATION: Among recently screened patients, the quality of decision-making about LCS is highly variable. The low use of educational materials including decision aids and imbalance of conveying benefit vs risk information to patients is concerning. A structured approach using decision aids may assist with providing a balanced presentation of information and may improve the quality of SDM.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 340
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What Exactly Is Shared Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening
    Anne C Melzer
    Sara E. Golden
    Sarah S. Ono
    Santanu Datta
    Kristina Crothers
    Christopher G. Slatore
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2020, 35 : 546 - 553
  • [2] What Exactly Is Shared Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening
    Melzer, Anne C.
    Golden, Sara E.
    Ono, Sarah S.
    Datta, Santanu
    Crothers, Kristina
    Slatore, Christopher G.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (02) : 546 - 553
  • [3] The Impact of Comorbidities on Lung Cancer Screening Shared Decision-making
    Kale, M. S.
    Schnur, J.
    Wisnivesky, J. P.
    Diefenbach, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 207
  • [4] Physicians' Responsibilities in Shared Decision-making for Lung Cancer Screening
    De Allie, Gabrielle
    Tanksley, Parris
    Chang, Eric Y.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 179 (07) : 994 - 995
  • [5] The Conundrum and Challenge of Lung Cancer Screening Shared Decision-making Implementation
    Marilyn M. Schapira
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2018, 33 : 989 - 990
  • [6] Impact of the shared decision-making process on lung cancer screening decisions
    Tan, Naomi Q. P.
    Nishi, Shawn P. E.
    Lowenstein, Lisa M.
    Mendoza, Tito R.
    Lopez-Olivo, Maria A.
    Crocker, Laura C.
    Sepucha, Karen R.
    Volk, Robert J.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (03): : 790 - 797
  • [7] Impact of a Lung Cancer Screening Counseling and Shared Decision-Making Visit
    Mazzone, Peter J.
    Tenenbaum, Amanda
    Seeley, Meredith
    Petersen, Hilary
    Lyon, Christina
    Han, Xiaozhen
    Wang, Xiao-Feng
    CHEST, 2017, 151 (03) : 572 - 578
  • [8] The Conundrum and Challenge of Lung Cancer Screening Shared Decision-making Implementation
    Schapira, Marilyn M.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 (07) : 989 - +
  • [9] Lung Cancer Screening No Shared Decision-making When Overlooking Carl Rogers
    Braillon, Alain
    CHEST, 2020, 158 (04) : 1795 - 1796
  • [10] Ensuring High-Quality Shared Decision-making for Lung Cancer Screening
    Volk, Robert J.
    Stacey, Dawn
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2022, 8 (11) : 1561 - 1562