Political Information Efficacy and Internet Effects in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election

被引:21
|
作者
Tedesco, John C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech Univ, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
political efficacy; political information efficacy; Internet politics; campaigns; gender and politics; YOUNG VOTERS; GENDER; SOCIALIZATION; ENGAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1177/0002764211398089
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Despite the increase in young adult political engagement during the early part of the twenty-first century, young adult voting rates remain relatively low. This study explores the effects of Internet messages on young adult political efficacy and political information efficacy through a pretest/posttest experiment. Young voters (N = 486) reported significantly increased political efficacy and political information efficacy following exposure to several experimental stimuli; however, young women in the sample lag behind their male counterparts with regard to the confidence in their political information. Perhaps not surprisingly, Democrat participants were significantly higher in political efficacy in the days prior to the 2008 U. S. presidential election as it seemed likely that their candidate would win the election. Exposure to a negative media presentation of young voters did not appear to thwart young adult political information efficacy. More research spanning citizen-citizen, candidate-citizen, media-citizen, and party-citizen online messages and their effects is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 713
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] In Play: A Commentary on Strategies in the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
    Jennifer Merolla
    Michael Munger
    Michael Tofias
    Public Choice, 2005, 123 : 19 - 37
  • [22] Descriptive Representation, Political Efficacy, and African Americans in the 2008 Presidential Election
    Merolla, Jennifer L.
    Sellers, Abbylin H.
    Fowler, Derek J.
    POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 34 (06) : 863 - 875
  • [23] Sarah Palin, A Nation Object(ifie)s: The Role of Appearance Focus in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election
    Nathan A. Heflick
    Jamie L. Goldenberg
    Sex Roles, 2011, 65 : 149 - 155
  • [24] Partisan Bias, Political Information and Spatial Voting in the 2008 Presidential Election
    Jessee, Stephen A.
    JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2010, 72 (02): : 327 - 340
  • [25] Web 2.0 and politics: The 2008 U.S. presidential election and an e-politics research agenda
    Wattal S.
    Schuff D.
    Mandviwalla M.
    Williams C.B.
    MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 2010, 34 (04): : 669 - 688
  • [26] An exploration of U.S. adults' information processing skills and political efficacy
    Saal, Leah Katherine
    Yamashita, Takashi
    Shaw, Donita M.
    Perry, Kristen H.
    JOURNAL OF ADULT AND CONTINUING EDUCATION, 2020, 26 (02) : 178 - 202
  • [27] Moral Values and Vote Choice in the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
    Knuckey, Jonathan
    POLITICS & POLICY, 2007, 35 (02) : 222 - 245
  • [28] The Polls and the U.S. Presidential Election in 2020 horizontal ellipsis . and 2024
    Barnett, Arnold
    Sarfati, Arnaud
    STATISTICS AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [29] Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Voters in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election
    Lewis, Gregory B.
    Rogers, Marc A.
    Sherrill, Kenneth
    POLITICS & POLICY, 2011, 39 (05) : 655 - 677
  • [30] Using state polls to forecast U.S. Presidential election outcomes
    Souren Soumbatiants
    Henry W. Chappell
    Eric Johnson
    Public Choice, 2006, 127 : 207 - 223