On the structure of dynamic principal component analysis used in statistical process monitoring

被引:73
|
作者
Vanhatalo, Erik [1 ]
Kulahci, Murat [1 ,2 ]
Bergquist, Bjarne [1 ]
机构
[1] Lulea Univ Technol, SE-97187 Lulea, Sweden
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Dynamic principal component analysis; Vector autoregressive process; Vector moving average process; Autocorrelation; Simulation; Tennessee Eastman process simulator; IDENTIFICATION; DISTURBANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemolab.2017.05.016
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
When principal component analysis (PCA) is used for statistical process monitoring it relies on the assumption that data are time independent. However, industrial data will often exhibit serial correlation. Dynamic PCA (DPCA) has been suggested as a remedy for high-dimensional and time-dependent data. In DPCA the input matrix is augmented by adding time-lagged values of the variables. In building a DPCA model the analyst needs to decide on (1) the number of lags to add, and (2) given a specific lag structure, how many principal components to retain. In this article we propose a new analyst driven method to determine the maximum number of lags in DPCA with a foundation in multivariate time series analysis. The method is based on the behavior of the eigenvalues of the lagged autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation matrices. Given a specific lag structure we also propose a method for determining the number of principal components to retain. The number of retained principal components is determined by visual inspection of the serial correlation in the squared prediction error statistic, Q (SPE), together with the cumulative explained variance of the model. The methods are illustrated using simulated vector autoregressive and moving average data, and tested on Tennessee Eastman process data.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laplacian regularized robust principal component analysis for process monitoring
    Xiu, Xianchao
    Yang, Ying
    Kong, Lingchen
    Liu, Wanquan
    Journal of Process Control, 2020, 92 : 212 - 219
  • [42] Laplacian regularized robust principal component analysis for process monitoring
    Xiu, Xianchao
    Yang, Ying
    Kong, Lingchen
    Liu, Wanquan
    JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2020, 92 : 212 - 219
  • [43] Online Process Monitoring using Multiscale Principal Component Analysis
    Nawaz, Muhammad
    Maulud, Abdulhalim Shah
    Zabiri, Haslinda
    4TH INNOVATION AND ANALYTICS CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION (IACE 2019), 2019, 2138
  • [44] Monitoring of SBR process using kernel principal component analysis
    Fan, Liping
    Yu, Haibin
    Yuan, Decheng
    Xu, Yang
    Yi Qi Yi Biao Xue Bao/Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2006, 27 (03): : 249 - 253
  • [45] Principal component analysis for process monitoring in distributed system environment
    Gao, Shi-wei
    Tian, Ran
    Chen, Peng
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2022, 34 (08):
  • [46] Online reduced kernel principal component analysis for process monitoring
    Fezai, Radhia
    Mansouri, Majdi
    Taouali, Okba
    Harkat, Mohamed Faouzi
    Bouguila, Nasreddine
    JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2018, 61 : 1 - 11
  • [47] Nonlinear process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis
    Lee, JM
    Yoo, CK
    Choi, SW
    Vanrolleghem, PA
    Lee, IB
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2004, 59 (01) : 223 - 234
  • [48] Wavelet functional principal component analysis for batch process monitoring
    Liu, Jingxiang
    Chen, Junghui
    Wang, Dan
    CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2020, 196 (196)
  • [49] Statistical process monitoring with principal components
    Mastrangelo, CM
    Runger, GC
    Montgomery, DC
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 12 (03) : 203 - 210
  • [50] Local component based principal component analysis model for multimode process monitoring
    Li, Yuan
    Yang, Dongsheng
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 34 : 116 - 124