Dexmedetomidine-remifentanil or propofol-remifentanil anesthesia in patients undergoing intracranial surgery

被引:3
|
作者
Günes, Y [1 ]
Gündüz, M [1 ]
Özcengiz, D [1 ]
Özbek, H [1 ]
Isik, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Cukurova Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol, TR-01330 Adana, Turkey
关键词
dexmedetomidine; propofol; remifentanil; intracranial surgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Dexmedetomidine has been shown to provide good perioperative hemodynamic stability with decreased intraoperative opioid requirements. This study was conducted to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine-remifentanil (DR) anesthesia and propofol-remifentanil (PR) anesthesia on perioperative hemodynamics and postanesthesia. recovery profiles in patients undergoing intracranial surge After receiving Ethics Committee approval and informed patient consent, 78 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II patients between the ages of 19 and 70 years with a Glasgow Coma Scale score 14 or 15 who were scheduled for elective intracranial surgery with general anesthesia were recruited. Anesthesia induction was provided by intravenous remifentanil (0.5 mu g/kg) and propofol (1.5-2 mg/kg) in both groups and maintained with infusion of DR (0.6-1.2 mg/kg/h and 0.25 mu g/kg/min)-nitrous oxide/oxygen (n(2)o/o(2)) in the DR group (n = 39) and infusion of PR (3-10 mg/kg/h and 0.25 mu g/kg/min)-n(2)o/o(2) in the PR group (n = 39). Hemodynamic variables were recorded before surgery, during the induction of anesthesia, after intubation, and during application of the headholder and skin incision; brain relaxation was also recorded. Times to extubation and awakening, eye opening, and response to commands as well as analgesic requirements were recorded after surgery. No significant difference was found in systolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure throughout the study period except at the time of the dural incision (P < 0.05). These variables were significantly lower in the DR group (P < 0.05). Brain relaxation scores were similar between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Time to extubation was significantly shorter in patients receiving PR anesthesia than in patients receiving DR anesthesia (3.6 minutes vs. 5.5 minutes). Analgesic requirements were significantly higher in the PR group than in the DR group (P = 0.013). No significant side effects were reported in the 2 groups (P > 0.05). In conclusion, dexmedetomidine (0.6-1.2 mu g/kg(-1)/h(-1)) Plus remifentanil (0.25 mu g/kg(-1) min(-1)) anesthesia offered lower analgesic requirements, a longer extubation time, and better hemodynamic stability compared with PR anesthesia for patients undergoing intracranial surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 126
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Propofol-remifentanil interaction: influence on recovery
    O'Hare, R
    Reid, J
    Breslin, D
    Hayes, A
    Mirakhur, RK
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 83 (01) : 180P - 180P
  • [22] Comparison of propofol/remifentanil and sevoflurane/remifentanil for maintenance of anaesthesia for elective intracranial surgery
    Sneyd, JR
    Andrews, CJH
    Tsubokawa, T
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 94 (06) : 778 - 783
  • [23] Application of propofol-remifentanil intravenous general anesthesia combined with regional block in pediatric ophthalmic surgery
    Li, Ming-Ying
    Fei, Yu-Da
    Zhang, Xiao-Xia
    Chen, Tian-Wen
    Li, Jie
    Sun, Xiao-Li
    Wang, Zhen-Yuan
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [24] Type of anesthesia and quality of recovery in male patients undergoing lumbar surgery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anesthesia with sevoflurane anesthesia
    Wenjun Meng
    Chengwei Yang
    Xin Wei
    Sheng Wang
    Fang Kang
    Xiang Huang
    Juan Li
    BMC Anesthesiology, 21
  • [25] Effect-site concentration of remifentanil for smooth emergence from propofol-remifentanil anesthesia in patients using double lumen tube
    Kang, Se Yoon
    Chae, Yun Jeong
    Park, Sung Yong
    Bae, Se Young
    Yoo, Ji Young
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2021, 72
  • [26] Electroencephalographic guided propofol-remifentanil TCI anesthesia with and without dexmedetomidine in a geriatric population: electroencephalographic signatures and clinical evaluation
    Mehler, Dominik M.
    Kreuzer, Matthias
    Obert, David P.
    Cardenas, Luis F.
    Barra, Ignacio
    Zurita, Fernando
    Lobo, Francisco A.
    Kratzer, Stephan
    Schneider, Gerhard
    Sepulveda, Pablo O.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2024, 38 (04) : 803 - 815
  • [27] Robust MISO Control of Propofol-Remifentanil Anesthesia Guided by the NeuroSENSE Monitor
    van Heusden, Klaske
    Ansermino, J. Mark
    Dumont, Guy A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 26 (05) : 1758 - 1770
  • [28] Effects of Dexmedetomidine Combined with Remifentanil Anesthesia and Propofol Combined with Remifentanil Anesthesia on Perioperative Inflammatory Response and Pulmonary Function in Patients with Lung Cancer
    Tian, Siqiang
    Jiang, Yao
    Wang, Ying
    Song, Jie
    ONCOLOGIE, 2020, 22 (01) : 13 - 21
  • [29] Type of anesthesia and quality of recovery in male patients undergoing lumbar surgery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anesthesia with sevoflurane anesthesia
    Meng, Wenjun
    Yang, Chengwei
    Wei, Xin
    Wang, Sheng
    Kang, Fang
    Huang, Xiang
    Li, Juan
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [30] Comparison of remimazolam-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Lee, Tae Young
    Kim, Min A.
    Eom, Deuk Won
    Jung, Ji Wook
    Chung, Chan Jong
    Park, Sang Yoong
    ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2023, 18 (03): : 252 - 259