Induction chemotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck: a meta-analysis

被引:30
|
作者
Zhang, Lijuan [1 ]
Jiang, Nan [1 ]
Shi, Yuexian [1 ]
Li, Shipeng [2 ]
Wang, Peiguo [3 ]
Zhao, Yue [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ, Sch Nursing, Tianjin 300070, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Med Univ, Cent Clin Coll 1, Tianjin 300192, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Med Univ Canc Inst & Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept Radiotherapy, Tianjin 300060, Peoples R China
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2015年 / 5卷
关键词
COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR; PHASE-III; RADIATION-THERAPY; UNRESECTABLE HEAD; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; CANCER; CISPLATIN; FLUOROURACIL; DOCETAXEL; 5-FLUOROURACIL;
D O I
10.1038/srep10798
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been considered to be the standard of care for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (LA-SCCHN). Whether induction chemotherapy (IC) with CCRT will further improve the clinical outcomes or not is still unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the two regimens for LA-SCCHN. Literature searches were carried out in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Chinese Biology Medicine from inception to November 2014. Five prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 922 patients were included in metaanalysis. Results were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) or relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Compared with CCRT, IC with CCRT showed no statistically significant differences in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) or locoregional recurrence rate (LRR), but could increase risks of grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia (P = 0.0009) and leukopenia (P = 0.04). In contrast, distant metastasis rate (DMR) decreased (P = 0.006) and complete response rate (CR) improved (P = 0.010) for IC with CCRT. In conclusion, the current studies do not support the use of IC with CCRT over CCRT, and the further positioning of IC with CCRT as standard treatment for LA-SCCHN will come from more RCTs directly comparing IC followed by CCRT with CCRT.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bi-Cheng Wang
    Bo-Ya Xiao
    Guo-He Lin
    Chang Wang
    Quentin Liu
    BMC Cancer, 20
  • [32] The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Bi-Cheng
    Xiao, Bo-Ya
    Lin, Guo-He
    Wang, Chang
    Liu, Quentin
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [33] Comparison between curative concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and curative concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a meta-analysis
    Yang, Xiaofang
    Chen, Lejun
    Yu, Dahai
    Song, Wei
    Ma, Jun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 42 (05) : 1029 - 1038
  • [34] The role of interim FDG-PET after induction chemotherapy as a prediction of the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced squamous carcinoma of the head and neck
    Kim, K-R.
    Shim, H-J.
    Hwang, J-E.
    Cho, S-H.
    Chung, I-J.
    Kwon, S. Y.
    Bae, W-K.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27
  • [35] Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent radio-chemotherapy versus concurrent radio-chemotherapy alone as treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC): A meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Budach, Wilfried
    Boelke, Edwin
    Kammers, Kai
    Gerber, Peter Arne
    Orth, Klaus
    Gripp, Stephan
    Matuschek, Christiane
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 118 (02) : 238 - 243
  • [36] Tislelizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective study
    He, Jiaqi
    Luo, Guoqing
    Liu, Shen
    Chen, Lingli
    Chen, Zihong
    Zhang, Bing
    Lin, Jiong
    Qin, Wenyi
    Li, Haiwen
    Zhou, Haideng
    Yu, Ying
    Zhan, Dechao
    Yang, Donghong
    Luo, Haiqing
    TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 48
  • [37] Comparison of Induction Chemotherapy plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy alone in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Treated with IMRT and Concurrent Cisplatin
    Chen, S.
    Wang, X.
    Feng, J. C.
    Wei, M.
    Chen, G.
    Yin, P.
    Huang, H.
    Zhang, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E480 - E480
  • [38] Concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (sequential approach) in the management of head and neck cancer
    Fabregas, Jesus C.
    Loaiza-Bonilla, Arturo
    Talebi, Toni N.
    Warsch, Sean
    Fernandez, Gustavo
    Raez, Luis E.
    Santos, Edgardo S.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2013, 13 (09) : 1065 - 1072
  • [39] Phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
    Kim, JG
    Sohn, SK
    Kim, DH
    Baek, JH
    Jeon, SB
    Chae, YS
    Lee, KB
    Park, JS
    Sohn, JH
    Kim, JC
    Park, IK
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 93 (10) : 1117 - 1121
  • [40] Phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
    Kim, J. G.
    Kim, D. H.
    Sohn, S. K.
    Baek, J. H.
    Chae, Y. S.
    Lee, K. B.
    Sohn, J. H.
    Park, J. S.
    Kim, J. C.
    Park, I. K.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 3 (02): : 300 - 300