Radiation doses for pediatric nuclear medicine studies: comparing the North American consensus guidelines and the pediatric dosage card of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine

被引:24
|
作者
Grant, Frederick D. [1 ,2 ]
Gelfand, Michael J. [3 ]
Drubach, Laura A. [1 ,2 ]
Treves, S. Ted [1 ,2 ]
Fahey, Frederic H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Div Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Joint Program Nucl Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Nucl Med Sect, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
关键词
Nuclear medicine; Pediatric; Internal dosimetry; Radiopharmaceutical dose; Guidelines;
D O I
10.1007/s00247-014-3211-x
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Estimated radiation dose is important for assessing and communicating the risks and benefits of pediatric nuclear medicine studies. Radiation dose depends on the radiopharmaceutical, the administered activity, and patient factors such as age and size. Most radiation dose estimates for pediatric nuclear medicine have not been based on administered activities of radiopharmaceuticals recommended by established practice guidelines. The dosage card of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) and the North American consensus guidelines each provide recommendations of administered activities of radiopharmaceuticals in children, but there are substantial differences between these two guidelines. For 12 commonly performed pediatric nuclear medicine studies, two established pediatric radiopharmaceutical administration guidelines were used to calculate updated radiation dose estimates and to compare the radiation exposure resulting from the recommendations of each of the guidelines. Estimated radiation doses were calculated for 12 common procedures in pediatric nuclear medicine using administered activities recommended by the dosage card of the EANM (version 1.5.2008) and the 2010 North American consensus guidelines for radiopharmaceutical administered activities in pediatrics. Based on standard models and nominal age-based weights, radiation dose was estimated for typical patients at ages 1, 5, 10 and 15 years and adult. The resulting effective doses were compared, with differences greater than 20% considered significant. Following either the EANM dosage card or the 2010 North American guidelines, the highest effective doses occur with radiopharmaceuticals labeled with fluorine-18 and iodine-123. In 24% of cases, following the North American consensus guidelines would result in a substantially higher radiation dose. The guidelines of the EANM dosage card would lead to a substantially higher radiation dose in 39% of all cases, and in 62% of cases in which patients were age 5 years or younger. For 12 commonly performed pediatric nuclear medicine studies, updated radiation dose estimates can guide efforts to reduce radiation exposure and provide current information for discussing radiation exposure and risk with referring physicians, patients and families. There can be substantial differences in radiation exposure for the same procedure, depending upon which of these two guidelines is followed. This discordance identifies opportunities for harmonization of the guidelines, which may lead to further reduction in nuclear medicine radiation doses in children.
引用
收藏
页码:706 / 713
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] European Association of Nuclear Medicine Focus 5: Consensus on Molecular Imaging and Theranostics in Prostate Cancer
    Oprea-Lager, Daniela-Elena
    Maclennan, Steven
    Bjartell, Anders
    Briganti, Alberto
    Burger, Irene A.
    de Jong, Igle
    De Santis, Maria
    Eberlein, Uta
    Emmett, Louise
    Fizazi, Karim
    Gillessen, Silke
    Herrmann, Ken
    Heskamp, Sandra
    Iagaru, Andrei
    Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
    Kunikowska, Jolanta
    Lam, Marnix
    Nanni, Cristina
    O'Sullivan, Joe M.
    Panebianco, Valeria
    Sala, Evis
    Sathekge, Mike
    Sosnowski, Roman
    Tilki, Derya
    Tombal, Bertrand
    Treglia, Giorgio
    Tunariu, Nina
    Walz, Jochen
    Yakar, Derya
    Dierckx, Rudi
    Sartor, Oliver
    Fanti, Stefano
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 (01) : 49 - 60
  • [33] Development of a radiopharmaceutical dose calculator for pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic nuclear medicine studies
    Pandey, Anil Kumar
    Sharma, Sanjay Kumar
    Sharma, Punit
    Gupta, Priyanka
    Kumar, Rakesh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2013, 28 (02): : 75 - 78
  • [34] A Joint Statement from the American Thyroid Association, the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the European Thyroid Association, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging on Current Diagnostic and Theranostic Approaches in the Management of Thyroid Cancer
    Gulec, Seza A.
    Ahuja, Sukhjeet
    Avram, Anca M.
    Bernet, Victor J.
    Bourguet, Patrick
    Draganescu, Ciprian
    Elisei, Rosella
    Giovanella, Luca
    Grant, Frederick
    Greenspan, Bennett
    Hegedus, Laszlo
    Jonklaas, Jacqueline
    Kloos, Richard T.
    Luster, Markus
    Oyen, Wim J. G.
    Smit, Johannes
    Tuttle, R. Michael
    THYROID, 2021, 31 (07) : 1009 - 1019
  • [35] Pediatric Radiopharmaceutical Administration: Harmonization of the 2007 EANM Paediatric Dosage Card (Version 1.5.2008) and the 2010 North American Consensus guideline
    Lassmann, Michael
    Treves, S. Ted
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2014, 41 (08) : 1636 - 1636
  • [36] Pediatric Radiopharmaceutical Administration: Harmonization of the 2007 EANM Paediatric Dosage Card (Version 1.5.2008) and the 2010 North American Consensus guideline
    Michael Lassmann
    S. Ted Treves
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2014, 41 : 1636 - 1636
  • [37] Radiation dose to the pediatric population of Slovak Republic from diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures.
    Ftacnikova, S
    Furiova, A
    IRPA9 - 1996 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON RADIATION PROTECTION / NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, PROCEEDINGS, VOL 3, 1996, : C488 - C490
  • [38] European association of nuclear medicine procedure guidelines for brain imaging using[18F]FDG
    Bartenstein, P
    Asenbaum, S
    Catafau, A
    Halldin, C
    Pilowski, L
    Pupi, A
    Tatsch, K
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2002, 29 (10) : BP43 - BP48
  • [39] Hybrid cardiovascular imaging: a clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the ESC
    Caobelli, Federico
    Balmforth, Craig
    Dweck, Marc R.
    Albano, Domenico
    Gheysens, Olivier
    Georgoulias, Panagiotis
    Nekolla, Stephan
    Lairez, Olivier
    Leccisotti, Lucia
    Lubberink, Mark
    Massalha, Samia
    Nappi, Carmela
    Rischpler, Christoph
    Saraste, Antti
    Hyafil, Fabien
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2025, 26 (03) : 566 - 568
  • [40] European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) Focus 4 consensus recommendations: molecular imaging and therapy in haematological tumours
    Nanni, Cristina
    Kobe, Carsten
    Baessler, Bettina
    Baues, Christian
    Boellaard, Ronald
    Borchmann, Peter
    Buck, Andreas
    Buvat, Irene
    Chapuy, Bjoern
    Cheson, Bruce D.
    Chrzan, Robert
    Cottereau, Ann-Segolene
    Duhrsen, Ulrich
    Eikenes, Live
    Hutchings, Martin
    Jurczak, Wojciech
    Kraeber-Bodere, Francoise
    Lopci, Egesta
    Luminari, Stefano
    MacLennan, Steven
    Mikhaeel, N. George
    Nijland, Marcel
    Rodriguez-Otero, Paula
    Treglia, Giorgio
    Withofs, Nadia
    Zamagni, Elena
    Zinzani, Pier Luigi
    Zijlstra, Josee M.
    Hermaann, Ken
    Kunikowska, Jolanta
    LANCET HAEMATOLOGY, 2023, 10 (05): : E367 - E381