Prognostic significance of circumferential margin involvement in rectal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and low anterior resection

被引:66
|
作者
Luna-Pérez, P
Bustos-Cholico, E
Alvarado, I
Maffuz, A
Rodríguez-Ramírez, S
De La Barrera, MG
Labastida, S
机构
[1] Hosp Oncol, Ctr Med Nacl Siglo 21, Inst Mexicano Seguro Social, Colorectal Serv,Surg Oncol Dept, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Hosp Oncol, Ctr Med Nacl Siglo 21, Inst Mexicano Seguro Social, Dept Pathol, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] Hosp Oncol, Ctr Med Nacl Siglo 21, Inst Mexicano Seguro Social, Stat Sect, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
关键词
rectal cancer; neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy; complete response; lymph node metastasis; total mesorectal excision;
D O I
10.1002/jso.20232
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Histologic examination of circumferential margins is an important predictor of local and distant relapse in non-radiated rectal cancer. However, for patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy this role has not yet been addressed. Methods: From January 1995 to December 1997, 61 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma located between 0 and 10 cm from anal verge with invasion into perirectal fat assessed by rectal ultrasound were included. All patients received 45 Gy + bolus infusion of 5-FU (450 mg/m(2)/days 1-5, 28-33 of RT); 4-6 weeks later, surgery was performed. Circumferential margin was assessed (< 2 mm was considered as positive). Five-year survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and comparison of groups with log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to find risk factors affecting local control and survival. Results: There were 35 males and 26 females, mean age 60.3 years. Twelve patients (19.7%) had circumferential margin involvement. Median follow-up was 44 months. Overall local recurrence was observed in 6 of 61 patients (9.8%); in patients without circumferential margin involvement this was 8%, whereas it was 16% in those with circumferential margin involvement (P = 0.33). Distant recurrence was observed in 22% of patients without circumferential margin involvement; conversely, it was 58.3% in those with involvement (P = 0.02). Five-year survival of patients without circumferential resection involvement margin was 81%, while it was 42% in patients with circumferential involvement (P = 0.006). Conclusions: In patients with rectal cancer treated by preoperative chemoradiation plus total mesorectal excision (TME) and sphincter saving surgery, circumferential margin involvement is associated with high incidence of distant recurrence and cancer-related death. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 25
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Early feeding and early hospital discharge following protective colostomy closure due to rectal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and low anterior resection
    Luna, P
    Rodriguez, S
    Flores, E
    Ramirez, L
    Martinez, H
    Labastida, S
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 12 (02) : S31 - S31
  • [23] Differences in circumferential resection margin involvement after abdominoperineal excision and low anterior resection no longer significant
    Van Leersum, N.
    Martijnse, I.
    Dulk, M.
    Kolfschoten, N. E.
    Le Cessie, S.
    Van de Velde, C. J.
    Tollenaar, R. A. E. M.
    Wouters, M. W. J. M.
    Rutten, H. J. T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S480 - S480
  • [24] Differences in Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement After Abdominoperineal Excision and Low Anterior Resection No Longer Significant
    van Leersum, Nicoline
    Martijnse, Ingrid
    den Dulk, Marcel
    Kolfschoten, Nikki
    Le Cessie, Saskia
    van de Velde, Cornelius
    Tollenaar, Rob
    Wouters, Michel
    Rutten, Harm J.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2014, 259 (06) : 1150 - 1155
  • [25] A Circumferential Resection Margin of 1 mm Is a Negative Prognostic Factor in Rectal Cancer Patients With and Without Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
    Park, Jong Seob
    Huh, Jung Wook
    Park, Yoon Ah
    Cho, Yong Beom
    Yun, Seong Hyeon
    Kim, Hee Cheol
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Chun, Ho-Kyung
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (08) : 933 - 940
  • [26] The significance of circumferential margin involvement following resection of oesophageal carcinoma
    Mapstone, N
    Quirke, P
    Dexter, S
    Sue-Ling, H
    Martin, I
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1999, 187 : 3A - 3A
  • [27] SIGNIFICANCE OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN INVOLVEMENT AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR CANCER
    SAGAR, PM
    JOHNSTON, D
    MCMAHON, MJ
    DIXON, MF
    QUIRKE, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 80 (11) : 1386 - 1388
  • [28] IMPLICATION OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN IN INTERSPHINCTERIC RESECTION OF LOW RECTAL CANCER
    Choi, G.
    Kim, H.
    Park, J.
    Park, S.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (05) : E268 - E268
  • [29] Characteristics and Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Assessed Circumferential Margin in Rectal Cancer
    Ma, Xiaoji
    Li, Xinxiang
    Xu, Linghui
    Shi, Debing
    Tong, Tong
    Huang, Dan
    Ding, Ying
    Cai, Sanjun
    Peng, Junjie
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2015, 2015
  • [30] Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer With Persistent Circumferential Resection Margin Invasion After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Kim, Chang Hyun
    Yeom, Seung-Seop
    Kwak, Hand-Duk
    Lee, Soo Young
    Ju, Jae Kyun
    Kim, Young Jin
    Kim, Hyeong Rok
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2019, 35 (02) : 72 - 82