Comparing the Spelling and Reading Abilities of Students With Cochlear Implants and Students With Typical Hearing

被引:24
|
作者
Apel, Kenn [1 ]
Masterson, Julie J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Carolina, Columbia, SC 29201 USA
[2] Missouri State Univ, Springfield, MO USA
来源
关键词
PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS; MORPHOLOGICAL AWARENESS; PHONEMIC AWARENESS; DEAF-CHILDREN; SKILLS; INTERVENTION; GRADES; KINDERGARTEN; INSTRUCTION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1093/deafed/env002
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine whether students with and without hearing loss (HL) differed in their spelling abilities and, specifically, in the underlying linguistic awareness skills that support spelling ability. Furthermore, we examined whether there were differences between the two groups in the relationship between reading and spelling. We assessed the spelling, word-level reading, and reading comprehension skills of nine students with cochlear implants and nine students with typical hearing who were matched for reading age. The students' spellings were analyzed to determine whether the misspellings were due to errors with phonemic awareness, orthographic pattern or morphological awareness, or poor mental graphemic representations. The students with HL demonstrated markedly less advanced spelling abilities than the students with typical hearing. For the students with HL, the misspellings were primarily due to deficiencies in orthographic pattern and morphological awareness. Correlations between measures of spelling and both real word reading and reading comprehension were lower for the students with HL. With additional investigations using a similar approach to spelling analysis that captures the underlying causes for spelling errors, researchers will better understand the linguistic awareness abilities that students with HL bring to the task of reading and spelling.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 135
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Spelling, Reading Abilities and Speech Perception in Deaf Children with a Cochlear Implant
    Simon, Marie
    Fromont, Lauren A.
    Le Normand, Marie-Therese
    Leybaert, Jacqueline
    SCIENTIFIC STUDIES OF READING, 2019, 23 (06) : 494 - 508
  • [12] Comparing the semantic networks of children with cochlear implants and children with typical hearing: Effects of length of language access
    Socher, Michaela
    Lofkvist, Ulrika
    Wass, Malin
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2022, 99
  • [13] School failure in students who are normal-hearing or deaf: with or without cochlear implants
    Duarte, Ivone
    Santos, Cristina Costa
    Rego, Guilhermina
    Nunes, Rui
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5 : 1 - 8
  • [14] How to Improve the Students'Reading Abilities
    Wang Minfei (Shaoguan Teacher’s college)
    韶关大学学报(自然科学版), 1996, (01) : 114 - 117
  • [15] How to Improve the Students’Reading Abilities
    Wang Minfei(Shaoguan Teacher’s college)
    韶关大学学报(社会科学版), 1996, (01) : 114 - 117
  • [16] READING, SPELLING, AND PHONOLOGY IN UNIVERSITY-STUDENTS
    CRONIN, V
    BEATON, G
    CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGY-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE, 1994, 35 (2A): : 112 - 112
  • [17] Comparing phonological skills and spelling abilities in children with reading and language impairments
    Larkin, Rebecca F.
    Snowling, Margaret J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2008, 43 (01) : 111 - 124
  • [18] Reading comprehension of an inferential text by deaf students with cochlear implants using cued speech
    Torres, Santiago
    Rodriguez, Jose-Miguel
    Garcia-Orza, Javier
    Calleja, Marina
    VOLTA REVIEW, 2008, 108 (01) : 37 - 57
  • [19] Evaluation of gap filling skills and reading mistakes of cochlear implanted and normally hearing students
    Cizmeci, Hulya
    Ciprut, Ayca
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 109 : 27 - 30
  • [20] A synthesis of spelling and reading interventions and their effects on the spelling outcomes of students with LD
    Wanzek, Jeanne
    Vaughn, Sharon
    Wexler, Jade
    Swanson, Elizabeth A.
    Edmonds, Meghan
    Kim, Ae-Hwa
    JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2006, 39 (06) : 528 - 543