Mercury emissions from the Idrija mercury mine measured by differential absorption lidar techniques and a point monitoring absorption spectrometer

被引:27
|
作者
Grönlund, R
Edner, H
Svanberg, S
Kotnik, J
Horvat, M
机构
[1] Lund Inst Technol, Atom Phys Div, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Jozef Stefan Inst, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
DIAL; atmospheric mercury flux; Idrija; mercury mine; OPO;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.03.027
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mercury emission measurements from the ldrija mercury mine in Slovenia were performed during an early November 2003 campaign, where the differential lidar technique was used to map mercury concentrations and an attempt was made to quantify the total mercury flux from the most contaminated area, the abandoned cinnabar roasting oven complex. Lidar concentration data were compared with data recorded with a Zeeman modulated atomic absorption instrument, operated from a vehicle equipped with a GPS localization system. Concentrations and fluxes were comparatively low due to low temperature and rainfall. The average flux from the distillation plant was measured to approximately 2 g h(-1). (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4067 / 4074
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [21] Differential Absorption Lidar (DIAL) Measurements of Pollutants and Greenhouse Gases from Industrial Emissions
    Innocenti, F.
    Robinson, R.
    GEFAHRSTOFFE REINHALTUNG DER LUFT, 2022, 82 (11-12): : 310 - 312
  • [22] Differential Absorption Lidar (DIAL) Measurements of Pollutants and Greenhouse Gases from Industrial Emissions
    Innocenti, Fabrizio
    Robinson, Rod
    Gefahrstoffe Reinhaltung der Luft, 2022, 82 (11-12): : 310 - 312
  • [23] Lidar reflectance from snow at 2.05 μm wavelength as measured by the JPL Airborne Laser Absorption Spectrometer
    Spiers, Gary D.
    Menzies, Robert T.
    Jacob, Joseph C.
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2016, 55 (08) : 1978 - 1986
  • [24] The accuracy and sensitivity of infrared differential absorption lidar measurements of hydrocarbon emissions from process units
    Walmsley, HL
    O'Connor, SJ
    PURE AND APPLIED OPTICS, 1998, 7 (04): : 907 - 925
  • [25] Measurement of total site mercury emissions from a chlor-alkali plant using ultraviolet differential optical absorption spectroscopy and cell room roof-vent monitoring
    Thoma, Eben D.
    Secrest, Cary
    Hall, Eric S.
    Jones, Donna Lee
    Shores, Richard C.
    Modrak, Mark
    Hashmonay, Ram
    Norwood, Phil
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 43 (03) : 753 - 757
  • [26] Fumarole compositions and mercury emissions from the Tatun Volcanic Field, Taiwan: Results from multi-component gas analyser, portable mercury spectrometer and direct sampling techniques
    Witt, M. L. I.
    Fischer, T. P.
    Pyle, D. M.
    Yang, T. F.
    Zellmer, G. F.
    JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 2008, 178 (04) : 636 - 643
  • [27] Experimental study on simultaneous monitoring of flue gas mercury and sulfur dioxide based on UV differential optical absorption spectroscopy
    School of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, Hebei Province, China
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao, 2013, 35 (44-49):
  • [28] Development of a differential-absorption lidar system for measurement of atmospheric atomic mercury by use of the third harmonic of an LDS-dye laser
    Nayuki, T
    Marumoto, K
    Fujii, T
    Fukuchi, T
    Nemoto, K
    Shirakawa, A
    Ueda, K
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2004, 43 (35) : 6487 - 6491
  • [29] TOTAL FLUXES OF SULFUR-DIOXIDE FROM THE ITALIAN VOLCANOS ETNA, STROMBOLI, AND VULCANO MEASURED BY DIFFERENTIAL ABSORPTION LIDAR AND PASSIVE DIFFERENTIAL OPTICAL-ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY
    EDNER, H
    RAGNARSON, P
    SVANBERG, S
    WALLINDER, E
    FERRARA, R
    CIONI, R
    RACO, B
    TADDEUCCI, G
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1994, 99 (D9) : 18827 - 18838
  • [30] Monitoring hydrogen sulfide molecules in the atmospheric boundary layer by differential absorption and scattering lidar from space
    Privalov, V. E.
    Shemanin, V. G.
    JOURNAL OF OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 85 (04) : 229 - 232