The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Firm Export: Evidence from China's Ecological Protection Red Line Policy?

被引:7
|
作者
Zhai, Huayun [1 ]
Liu, Danlan [1 ]
Chan, Kam C. [2 ]
机构
[1] South Cent Univ Nationalities, Sch Management, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Western Kentucky Univ, Gordon Ford Coll Business, Bowling Green, KY 42101 USA
关键词
environmental regulation; Porter hypothesis; pollution haven hypothesis; POLLUTION HAVEN HYPOTHESIS; INDUSTRY; GROWTH; BIRTHS; PANEL; FDI;
D O I
10.3390/su11195493
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China conducted a comprehensive overhaul of its environmental regulation as of April 2014. The regulation, which calls for a holistic approach to protect the environment, is also called the "Ecological Protection Red Line" (Red Line). It sets comprehensive standards for pollutants and mandates provinces to implement the regulations. The Porter and pollution haven hypotheses were tested for the impact of the Red Line on firm exports using a sample of Chinese A-share firms from 2011 to 2017. Our findings are consistent with the Porter hypothesis. The implementation of the Red Line has a positive impact on a firm's exports. The findings are robust to alternative metrics of exports and different sub-samples. A firm's innovation activities (in terms of research and development investments) and production efficiency were found to be the transmission channels, corroborating the underlying logic of the Porter hypothesis. Policy implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Export duration and firm markups: evidence from China
    Wen Yue
    Qingxia Lin
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10
  • [22] The impact of environmental supervision on firms’ energy efficiency: evidence from the Environmental Protection Admonishing Talk policy in China
    Ying Jiang
    Na Chen
    Dandan Zhu
    Meibo Huang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 37775 - 37790
  • [23] The impact of environmental supervision on firms' energy efficiency: evidence from the Environmental Protection Admonishing Talk policy in China
    Jiang, Ying
    Chen, Na
    Zhu, Dandan
    Huang, Meibo
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (13) : 37775 - 37790
  • [24] Environmental Regulation and Corporate Cash Holdings: Evidence From China's New Environmental Protection Law
    Zhang, Chao
    Cheng, Jinkai
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [25] The impact of technology identification policy on firm innovation: Evidence from China
    Fang, Hongsheng
    Wu, Xiao
    Shen, Jim Huangnan
    Zhao, Lexin
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2022, 76
  • [26] The impact of tax policy on firm debt maturity: Evidence from China's VAT reform
    Zou, Jingxian
    Shen, Guangjun
    ECONOMICS OF TRANSITION AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE, 2023, 31 (02) : 295 - 317
  • [27] Statistical Analysis of the Impact of Environmental Regulation on China's Agricultural Products Export
    Pang, Lei
    Wang, Qiying
    2018 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MATERIAL APPLICATION, 2019, 252
  • [28] Evaluating public participation impact on environmental protection and ecological efficiency in China: Evidence from PITI disclosure
    Tu, Zhengge
    Hu, Tianyang
    Shen, Renjun
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 55 : 111 - 123
  • [29] Impact of financing constraints on firm's environmental performance: Evidence from China with survey data
    Tian, Peng
    Lin, Boqiang
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 217 : 432 - 439
  • [30] Environmental Regulation, Environmental Decentralization, and Enterprise Environmental Protection Investment: Evidence From China
    Liu, Li
    Ren, Guangqian
    He, Banghua
    Zheng, Minna
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10