The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Firm Export: Evidence from China's Ecological Protection Red Line Policy?

被引:7
|
作者
Zhai, Huayun [1 ]
Liu, Danlan [1 ]
Chan, Kam C. [2 ]
机构
[1] South Cent Univ Nationalities, Sch Management, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Western Kentucky Univ, Gordon Ford Coll Business, Bowling Green, KY 42101 USA
关键词
environmental regulation; Porter hypothesis; pollution haven hypothesis; POLLUTION HAVEN HYPOTHESIS; INDUSTRY; GROWTH; BIRTHS; PANEL; FDI;
D O I
10.3390/su11195493
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China conducted a comprehensive overhaul of its environmental regulation as of April 2014. The regulation, which calls for a holistic approach to protect the environment, is also called the "Ecological Protection Red Line" (Red Line). It sets comprehensive standards for pollutants and mandates provinces to implement the regulations. The Porter and pollution haven hypotheses were tested for the impact of the Red Line on firm exports using a sample of Chinese A-share firms from 2011 to 2017. Our findings are consistent with the Porter hypothesis. The implementation of the Red Line has a positive impact on a firm's exports. The findings are robust to alternative metrics of exports and different sub-samples. A firm's innovation activities (in terms of research and development investments) and production efficiency were found to be the transmission channels, corroborating the underlying logic of the Porter hypothesis. Policy implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of environmental regulation on firm exports: evidence from environmental information disclosure policy in China
    Fang, Jiayu
    Liu, Cenjie
    Gao, Chao
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (36) : 37101 - 37113
  • [2] The impact of environmental regulation on firm exports: evidence from environmental information disclosure policy in China
    Jiayu Fang
    Cenjie Liu
    Chao Gao
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26 : 37101 - 37113
  • [3] Environmental Regulation, Industrial Structure Upgrading and Ecological Efficiency: Evidence from China's Implementation of Environmental Protection Tax
    He, Shuangxi
    Zhao, Yan
    Wang, Xiongying
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2024, 33 (05): : 5114 - 5126
  • [4] Environmental regulations and export performance: firm-level evidence from China’s low-carbon pilot policy
    Shiyu Cheng
    Qingqing He
    Digital Economy and Sustainable Development, 2 (1):
  • [5] The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Productivity and Exports: A Firm-Level Evidence from China
    Huang, Xiaobing
    Liu, Xiaolian
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2019, 55 (11) : 2589 - 2608
  • [6] The impact of export VAT rebates on firm productivity: Evidence from China
    Tang, Baoqing
    Gao, Bo
    Ma, Jing
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2021, 44 (10): : 2797 - 2819
  • [7] Environmental regulation and employment: Evidence from China's new Environmental Protection Law
    Li, Zhuo
    Li, Yuanqi
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2024, 82 : 400 - 416
  • [8] Corruption and firm efforts on environmental protection: Evidence from a policy shock
    Yang, Cheng
    Zhang, Wenzhe
    Sheng, Yan
    Yang, Zhiqing
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2021, 65
  • [9] Environmental regulation, ESG, and firm value: evidence from China
    Fang, Mingyue
    Hong, Jieying
    Nie, Huihua
    Shen, Xinyi
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [10] Business strategy and firm efforts on environmental protection: Evidence from China
    Kong, Dongmin
    Yang, Xiandong
    Liu, Chen
    Yang, Wei
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 29 (02) : 445 - 464