Supervised autonomy for online learning in human-robot interaction

被引:30
|
作者
Senft, Emmanuel [1 ]
Baxter, Paul [2 ]
Kennedy, James [1 ]
Lemaignan, Severin [1 ]
Belpaeme, Tony [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Plymouth Univ, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
[2] Univ Lincoln, Lincoln Ctr Autonomous Syst, Lincoln LN6 7TS, England
[3] Univ Ghent, Dept Elect & Informat Syst, Imec IDLab, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Human-Robot interaction; Reinforcement learning; Interactive machine learning; Robotics; Progressive Autonomy; Supervised autonomy;
D O I
10.1016/j.patrec.2017.03.015
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
When a robot is learning it needs to explore its environment and how its environment responds on its actions. When the environment is large and there are a large number of possible actions the robot can take, this exploration phase can take prohibitively long. However, exploration can often be optimised by letting a human expert guide the robot during its learning. Interactive machine learning, in which a human user interactively guides the robot as it learns, has been shown to be an effective way to teach a robot. It requires an intuitive control mechanism to allow the human expert to provide feedback on the robot's progress. This paper presents a novel method which combines Reinforcement Learning and Supervised Progressively Autonomous Robot Competencies (SPARC). By allowing the user to fully control the robot and by treating rewards as implicit, SPARC aims to learn an action policy while maintaining human supervisory oversight of the robot's behaviour. This method is evaluated and compared to Interactive Reinforcement Learning in a robot teaching task. Qualitative and quantitative results indicate that SPARC allows for safer and faster learning by the robot, whilst not placing a high workload on the human teacher. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 86
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A survey of communicating robot learning during human-robot interaction
    Habibian, Soheil
    Valdivia, Antonio Alvarez
    Blumenschein, Laura H.
    Losey, Dylan P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [32] Interaction Task Motion Learning for Human-Robot Interaction Control
    Lyu, Shangke
    Selvaraj, Nithish Muthuchamy
    Cheah, Chien Chern
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS, 2022, 52 (05) : 894 - 906
  • [33] Human-Robot Interaction
    Jia, Yunyi
    Zhang, Biao
    Li, Miao
    King, Brady
    Meghdari, Ali
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS, 2018, 2018
  • [34] Human-Robot Interaction
    Sidobre, Daniel
    Broquere, Xavier
    Mainprice, Jim
    Burattini, Ernesto
    Finzi, Alberto
    Rossi, Silvia
    Staffa, Mariacarla
    ADVANCED BIMANUAL MANIPULATION: RESULTS FROM THE DEXMART PROJECT, 2012, 80 : 123 - +
  • [35] Human-Robot Interaction
    Sethumadhavan, Arathi
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2012, 20 (03) : 27 - +
  • [36] Human-robot interaction
    Murphy R.R.
    Nomura T.
    Billard A.
    Burke J.L.
    IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 2010, 17 (02): : 85 - 89
  • [37] Human-robot interaction
    Kosuge, K
    Hirata, Y
    IEEE ROBIO 2004: PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND BIOMIMETICS, 2004, : 8 - 11
  • [38] Human-robot interaction
    Sidobre, Daniel
    Broquère, Xavier
    Mainprice, Jim
    Burattini, Ernesto
    Finzi, Alberto
    Rossi, Silvia
    Staffa, Mariacarla
    Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, 2012, 80 (STAR): : 123 - 172
  • [39] Human-Robot Interaction
    Ivaldi, Serena
    Pateraki, Maria
    ERCIM NEWS, 2018, (114): : 6 - 7
  • [40] Online Assessment of Human-Robot Interaction for Hybrid Control of Walking
    del-Ama, Antonio J.
    Moreno, Juan C.
    Gil-Agudo, Angel
    de-los-Reyes, Ana
    Pons, Jose L.
    SENSORS, 2012, 12 (01) : 215 - 225