Life cycle assessment of natural and recycled gypsum production in the Spanish context

被引:49
|
作者
Pedreno-Rojas, M. A. [1 ]
Fort, J. [2 ]
Cerny, R. [2 ]
Rubio-de-Hita, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, Dept Construcc Arquitecton 1, Escuela Tecn Super Arquitectura, Ave Reina Mercedes 2, E-41012 Seville 1, Spain
[2] Czech Tech Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Mat Engn & Chem, Thakurova 7, CZ-16629 Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
Gypsum waste; Recycled gypsum; Environmental impact; LCA; Waste utilization; FGD GYPSUM; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; HYDROGEN-SULFIDE; CONSTRUCTION; EMISSIONS; CEMENT; PLASTER; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120056
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Spain occupies a very prominent position as a world producer of gypsum. Consequently, the industrial processes are more refined, as the production volumes of the factories are much higher than in other countries. Therefore, the environmental impacts of the production of one ton of gypsum are significantly lower. However, new cleaner alternatives must be studied to promote more sustainable construction. In that sense, this paper aims at studying the environmental assessment of the production of natural and recycled gypsum in the Spanish context. In order to conduct the environmental analysis, a from cradle to gate life cycle assessment (LCA) was carried out, using the Impact 2002 + methodology. All the input data was obtained from a medium-size gypsum manufacturer located in Jaen (Andalusia), one of the best regions in terms of gypsum purity. The results for all the scenarios under study were analyzed separately and compared with previous studies published by other investigators and manufacturers' reports data. Contrary to most other previous researches, the LCA was performed on the basis of primary data given by the producer, and the regional factors were also taken into account. The results achieved in the LCA showed for the production of recycled gypsum (from plasterboard and powder waste) a significant improvement (more than 40%) in all the impact categories understudy, as compared to the natural gypsum production. Furthermore, the results obtained for the endpoint indicators showed an important reduction (56 and 58%) of the environmental impacts when recycled gypsum production was compared with the natural one. On the other hand, it was reaffirmed that the natural gypsum production process in Spain is less environmentally harmful than in other countries. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Indicators to Measure the Management Performance of End-of-Life Gypsum: From Deconstruction to Production of Recycled Gypsum
    Ana Jiménez-Rivero
    Justo García-Navarro
    Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2016, 7 : 913 - 927
  • [22] A review of life cycle assessment of recycled aggregate concrete
    Zhang, Yurong
    Luo, Wei
    Wang, Jingjing
    Wang, Yuanfeng
    Xu, Yaqin
    Xiao, Jianzhuang
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2019, 209 : 115 - 125
  • [23] Comparison of Life Cycle Environmental Impacts between Natural Gypsum Board and FGD Gypsum Board
    Peng Zhenguo
    Ma Lili
    Gong Xianzheng
    SILICATE BUILDING MATERIALS - SBM 2013, 2014, 599 : 15 - +
  • [24] Life Cycle Assessment of Biofuels Production Processes in Viticulture in the Context of Circular Economy
    Kovacs, Eniko
    Hoaghia, Maria-Alexandra
    Senila, Lacrimioara
    Scurtu, Daniela Alexandra
    Varaticeanu, Cerasel
    Roman, Cecilia
    Dumitras, Diana Elena
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [25] The life cycle assessment of stabilized rammed earth reinforced with natural fibers in the context of Australia
    Ramezannia, Amin
    Gocer, Ozgur
    Tabrizi, Toktam Bashirzadeh
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2024, 416
  • [26] TiO2 nanoparticles influence on the environmental performance of natural and recycled mortars: A life cycle assessment
    Moro, Carlos
    Francioso, Vito
    Schrager, Molly
    Velay-Lizancos, Mirian
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2020, 84 (84)
  • [27] Environmental profile of natural biological vanillin production via life cycle assessment
    Zhao, Xinyue
    Chen, Juntong
    Meng, Xiangwei
    Li, Lanqing
    Zhou, Xue
    Li, Jianguo
    Bai, Shunwen
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 308
  • [28] Olive pomace versus natural gas for methanol production: a life cycle assessment
    Puig-Gamero, Maria
    Parascanu, Maria Magdalena
    Sanchez, Paula
    Sanchez-Silva, Luz
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (23) : 30335 - 30350
  • [29] Olive pomace versus natural gas for methanol production: a life cycle assessment
    María Puig-Gamero
    María Magdalena Parascanu
    Paula Sánchez
    Luz Sanchez-Silva
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 30335 - 30350
  • [30] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of MWool® Recycled Wool Fibers
    Bianco, Isabella
    Gerboni, Raffaella
    Picerno, Giuseppe
    Blengini, Gian Andrea
    RESOURCES-BASEL, 2022, 11 (05):