Equity-efficiency trade-off in China's energy capping policy

被引:21
|
作者
Guo, Jin [1 ,4 ]
Du, Limin [2 ]
Wei, Chu [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Dev & Reform Commiss, Acad Macroecon Res, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, China Acad West Reg Dev, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Renmin Univ China, Sch Econ, Dept Energy Econ, 59 Zhongguancun St, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[4] Renmin Univ China, Natl Acad Dev & Strategy, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Equity; Efficiency; Trade-off; Energy cap; China; GLOBAL WARMING POLICY; EMISSIONS; ALLOCATION; ABATEMENT; SCHEME; DECENTRALIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.017
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As a part of the transition to a sustainable economy, China has set a cap on primary energy consumption for the first time, of 5.0 billion tonnes of standard coal equivalent by 2020. However, there is a debate on the cap feasibility and failure to adequately address the underlying equity-efficiency trade-off, which hampers achievement. This paper identifies some key challenges ahead, including the coal-dominant energy mix, declining financial support, inconsistent central-local goals, rising costs of energy-saving measures and quality of energy statistical data. By quantifying the preference of each providence toward equity-based or efficiency-based allocation schemes, the great disparity among provinces is revealed and the equity-efficiency trade-off relationship is confirmed. Developing regions, primarily located in central and western areas, tend to favor equity based disaggregating schemes. Contrarily, developed coastal provinces strongly favor efficiency-based schemes. The present national disaggregation schemes are mainly based on historical energy consumption, but disregard the provincial development gap and efficiency factors. We conclude that this ambitious goal is likely within reach, but increased efforts and flexible instruments are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 65
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Labour market programmes and the equity-efficiency trade-off
    Filges, Trine
    Kennes, John
    Larsen, Birthe
    Tranaes, Torben
    JOURNAL OF MACROECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (04) : 738 - 753
  • [12] Irreversibility and uncertainty cause an intergenerational equity-efficiency trade-off
    Hoberg, Nikolai
    Baumgaertner, Stefan
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 131 : 75 - 86
  • [13] An equity-efficiency trade-off in a geometric approach to committee selection
    Eckert, Daniel
    Klamler, Christian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2010, 26 (03) : 386 - 391
  • [14] Corrective regulations on renewable energy certificates trading: Pursuing an equity-efficiency trade-off
    Wang, Ge
    Zhang, Qi
    Li, Yan
    Mclellan, Benjamin C.
    Pan, Xunzhang
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 80 : 970 - 982
  • [15] On the equity-efficiency trade-off in food-bank network operations
    Firouz, Mohammad
    Li, LinDa
    Cobb, Barry
    Shao, Feibo
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2023, 74 (12) : 2493 - 2514
  • [16] A nonparametric elicitation of the equity-efficiency trade-off in cost-utility analysis
    Bleichrodt, H
    Doctor, J
    Stolk, E
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 24 (04) : 655 - 678
  • [17] Improving the Equity-Efficiency Trade-Off: Mandatory Savings Accounts for Social Insurance
    A. Lans Bovenberg
    Peter Birch Sørensen
    International Tax and Public Finance, 2004, 11 : 507 - 529
  • [18] Improving the equity-efficiency trade-off: Mandatory savings accounts for social insurance
    Bovenberg, AL
    Sorensen, PB
    INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2004, 11 (04) : 507 - 529
  • [19] QALYS AND THE EQUITY-EFFICIENCY TRADE-OFF (VOL 10, PG 21, 1991)
    WAGSTAFF, A
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1993, 12 (02) : 237 - 237
  • [20] Balancing the equity-efficiency trade-off in personal income taxation: an evolutionary approach
    Simone Pellegrino
    Guido Perboli
    Giovanni Squillero
    Economia Politica, 2019, 36 : 37 - 64