Machine-Learning Methods for Earthquake Ground Motion Analysis and Simulation

被引:48
|
作者
Alimoradi, Arzhang [1 ]
Beck, James L. [2 ]
机构
[1] So Methodist Univ, Dept Math, Dallas, TX 75205 USA
[2] CALTECH, Engn & Appl Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
关键词
Ground motion; Earthquake engineering; Simulation models; Optimization; Machine learning; Principal component analysis; Gaussian process regression; Genetic algorithms; Intensity measures; Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis; ANALYSES OFTEN LEAD; SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS; AVERAGE HORIZONTAL COMPONENT; SHEAR-FLEXURAL RESPONSE; MOMENT-RESISTING FRAMES; PREDICTION EQUATIONS; MULTISTORY BUILDINGS; GENETIC ALGORITHM; EMPIRICAL-MODEL; TIME HISTORIES;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000869
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
This paper presents a novel method of data-based probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) and ground motion simulation, verified using previously recorded strong-motion data and machine-learning techniques. The procedure consists of three parts: (1) selection of an orthonormal set of basis vectors called eigenquakes to represent characteristic earthquake records; (2) estimation of response spectra for the anticipated level of shaking for a scenario earthquake at a site using Gaussian process regression; and (3) optimal combination of the eigenquakes to generate time series of ground acceleration consistent with the response spectral ordinates obtained in the second part. The paper discusses the benefits of applying such machine-learning methods to strong-motion databases for PSHA and ground motion simulation, particularly in large urban areas where dense instrumentation is available or expected. The effectiveness of the proposed methodology is exhibited using four scenario examples for downtown Los Angeles. Advantages, disadvantages, and future research needs for this machine-learning approach to PSHA are discussed. (C) 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gold and Bitcoin Optimal Portfolio Research and Analysis Based on Machine-Learning Methods
    Li, Jingjing
    Rao, Xinge
    Li, Xianyi
    Guan, Sihai
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [32] A comparative analysis of unsupervised machine-learning methods in PSG-related phenotyping
    Ghorvei, Mohammadreza
    Karhu, Tuomas
    Hietakoste, Salla
    Ferreira-Santos, Daniela
    Hrubos-Strom, Harald
    Islind, Anna Sigridur
    Biedebach, Luka
    Nikkonen, Sami
    Leppaenen, Timo
    Rusanen, Matias
    JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [33] MODELING EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION FOR FAILURE ANALYSIS
    DARGAHINOUBARY, GR
    TECTONOPHYSICS, 1989, 167 (2-4) : 151 - 155
  • [34] Predicting Ground Level Ozone in Marrakesh by Machine-Learning Techniques
    Ordieres-Mere, J.
    Ouarzazi, J.
    El Johra, B.
    Gong, B.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATICS, 2020, 36 (02) : 93 - 106
  • [35] Travelling through levels of resolution with machine-learning methods
    Lemke, Tobias
    Hunkler, Simon
    Kukharenko, Oleksandra
    Peter, Christine
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 257
  • [36] Review of Medical Decision Support and Machine-Learning Methods
    Awaysheh, Abdullah
    Wilcke, Jeffrey
    Elvinger, Francois
    Rees, Loren
    Fan, Weiguo
    Zimmerman, Kurt L.
    VETERINARY PATHOLOGY, 2019, 56 (04) : 512 - 525
  • [37] Machine-learning accelerated geometry optimization in molecular simulation
    Yang, Yilin
    Jimenez-Negron, Omar A.
    Kitchin, John R.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 154 (23):
  • [38] MEMS Accelerometers Classification Using Machine-Learning Methods
    Nevlydov, Igor
    Ponomaryova, Ganna
    Miliutina, Svitlana
    Bortnikova, Viktoriia
    2017 XIIITH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERSPECTIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND METHODS IN MEMS DESIGN (MEMSTECH), 2017, : 51 - 55
  • [39] Machine-learning approaches in drug discovery: methods and applications
    Lavecchia, Antonio
    DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2015, 20 (03) : 318 - 331
  • [40] Prediction of Hemolytic Toxicity for Saponins by Machine-Learning Methods
    Zheng, Suqing
    Wang, Yibing
    Liu, Hongmei
    Chang, Wenping
    Xu, Yong
    Lin, Fu
    CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 2019, 32 (06) : 1014 - 1026