Ultrasound Features Improve Diagnostic Performance of Ovarian Cancer Predictors in Distinguishing Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors

被引:14
|
作者
Chen, Yong-ning [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Fei [3 ]
Zhang, Ya-di [2 ]
Chen, Li [4 ]
Li, Chan-yuan [2 ]
Gong, Shi-peng [2 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gynecol, Guangzhou 510632, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Guangzhou 510515, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Ultrasonog, Guangzhou 510515, Peoples R China
[4] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept PET Ctr, Guangzhou 510515, Peoples R China
关键词
cancer antigen 125; human epididymis-specific protein 4; Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm; Risk of Malignancy Index; Risk of Malignancy Index model; Rajavithi-Ovarian Cancer Predictive Score; ovarian masses; EPIDIDYMIS PROTEIN 4; MENOPAUSAL STATUS; ROMA ALGORITHM; SCORING SYSTEM; INDEX RMI; HE-4; CA125; RISK; BIOMARKERS; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s11596-020-2163-7
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
To determine whether ultrasound features can improve the diagnostic performance of tumor markers in distinguishing ovarian tumors, we enrolled 719 patients diagnosed as having ovarian tumors at Nanfang Hospital from September 2014 to November 2016. Age, menopausal status, histopathology, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages, tumor biomarker levels, and detailed ultrasound reports of patients were collected. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of the bellow-mentioned predictors were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Of the 719 patients, 531 had benign lesions, 119 had epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC), 44 had borderline ovarian tumors (BOT), and 25 had non-EOC. AUCs and the sensitivity of cancer antigen 125 (CA125), human epididymis-specific protein 4 (HE4), Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA), Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI1), HE4 model, and Rajavithi-Ovarian Cancer Predictive Score (R-OPS) in the overall population were 0.792, 0.854, 0.856, 0.872, 0.893, 0.852, and 70.2%, 56.9%, 69.1%, 60.6%, 77.1%, 71.3%, respectively. For distinguishing EOC from benign tumors, the AUCs and sensitivity of the above mentioned predictors were 0.888, 0.946, 0.947, 0.949, 0.967, 0.966, and 84.0%, 79.8%, 87.4%, 84.9%, 90.8%, 89.1%, respectively. Their specificity in predicting benign diseases was 72.9%, 94.4%, 87.6%, 95.9%, 86.3%, 90.8%, respectively. Therefore, we consider biomarkers in combination with ultrasound features may improve the diagnostic performance in distinguishing malignant from benign ovarian tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 191
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Telomerase activity in benign and malignant epithelial ovarian tumors
    Wan, MH
    Li, WZ
    Duggan, BD
    Felix, JC
    Zhao, YL
    Dubeau, L
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (06) : 437 - 441
  • [32] Comparison of benign, borderline, and malignant mucinous ovarian tumors
    Yamamoto, Y.
    Kunimi, Y.
    Wakikawa, A.
    Ueno, A.
    Nagai, R.
    Komatsu, J.
    Minami, S.
    Hayashi, K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 39 (05) : 751 - 754
  • [33] BENIGN TO MALIGNANT TRANSFORMATION IN EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-TUMORS
    AUSTIN, RM
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1993, 24 (05) : 562 - 562
  • [34] Spectropolarimetry in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors
    Peresunko, O. P.
    Yermolenko, S. B.
    Gruia, I.
    THIRTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CORRELATION OPTICS, 2017, 10612
  • [35] Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography-Based Risk Models in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors in a US Cohort
    Yoeli-Bik, Roni
    Longman, Ryan E.
    Wroblewski, Kristen
    Weigert, Melanie
    Abramowicz, Jacques S.
    Lengyel, Ernst
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (07) : E2323289
  • [36] Differentiation of Borderline Epithelial Ovarian Tumors from Benign and Malignant Epithelial Ovarian Tumors by MRI Scoring
    Babaoglu, Seyma
    Atas, Abdullah Enes
    Kerimoglu, Ulku
    Iyisoy, Mehmet Sinan
    Kilinc, Fahriye
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 20
  • [37] Heparanase-2 Expression in Normal Ovarian Epithelium and in Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors
    de Moura, Joel Pereira, Jr.
    Nicolau, Sergio Mancini
    Stavale, Joao Norberto
    da Silva Pinhal, Maria Aparecida
    de Matos, Leandro Luongo
    Baracat, Edmund Chada
    de Lima, Geraldo Rodrigues
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2009, 19 (09) : 1494 - 1500
  • [38] SUBJECTIVE ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT AND THE ADNEX MODEL TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN BENIGN AND MALIGNANT OVARIAN TUMORS.
    Maggiore, U. Leone Roberti
    Chiappa, V.
    Bogani, G.
    Perotto, S.
    Signorelli, M.
    Martinelli, F.
    Ditto, A.
    Ferrero, S.
    Lorusso, D.
    Raspagliesi, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 : 972 - 972
  • [39] Discriminating Between Benign and Malignant Solid Ovarian Tumors Based on Clinical and Radiomic Features of MRI
    Zheng, Yuemei
    Wang, Hong
    Li, Qiong
    Sun, Haoran
    Guo, Li
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2023, 30 (05) : 814 - 822
  • [40] The educational game SonoQz improves diagnostic performance in ultrasound assessment of ovarian tumors
    Smedberg, Erica
    Akerlund, Mans
    Franko, Mikael Andersson
    Epstein, Elisabeth
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2024, 103 (10) : 2053 - 2060