Ultrasound Features Improve Diagnostic Performance of Ovarian Cancer Predictors in Distinguishing Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors

被引:14
|
作者
Chen, Yong-ning [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Fei [3 ]
Zhang, Ya-di [2 ]
Chen, Li [4 ]
Li, Chan-yuan [2 ]
Gong, Shi-peng [2 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gynecol, Guangzhou 510632, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Guangzhou 510515, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Ultrasonog, Guangzhou 510515, Peoples R China
[4] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept PET Ctr, Guangzhou 510515, Peoples R China
关键词
cancer antigen 125; human epididymis-specific protein 4; Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm; Risk of Malignancy Index; Risk of Malignancy Index model; Rajavithi-Ovarian Cancer Predictive Score; ovarian masses; EPIDIDYMIS PROTEIN 4; MENOPAUSAL STATUS; ROMA ALGORITHM; SCORING SYSTEM; INDEX RMI; HE-4; CA125; RISK; BIOMARKERS; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s11596-020-2163-7
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
To determine whether ultrasound features can improve the diagnostic performance of tumor markers in distinguishing ovarian tumors, we enrolled 719 patients diagnosed as having ovarian tumors at Nanfang Hospital from September 2014 to November 2016. Age, menopausal status, histopathology, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages, tumor biomarker levels, and detailed ultrasound reports of patients were collected. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of the bellow-mentioned predictors were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Of the 719 patients, 531 had benign lesions, 119 had epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC), 44 had borderline ovarian tumors (BOT), and 25 had non-EOC. AUCs and the sensitivity of cancer antigen 125 (CA125), human epididymis-specific protein 4 (HE4), Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA), Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI1), HE4 model, and Rajavithi-Ovarian Cancer Predictive Score (R-OPS) in the overall population were 0.792, 0.854, 0.856, 0.872, 0.893, 0.852, and 70.2%, 56.9%, 69.1%, 60.6%, 77.1%, 71.3%, respectively. For distinguishing EOC from benign tumors, the AUCs and sensitivity of the above mentioned predictors were 0.888, 0.946, 0.947, 0.949, 0.967, 0.966, and 84.0%, 79.8%, 87.4%, 84.9%, 90.8%, 89.1%, respectively. Their specificity in predicting benign diseases was 72.9%, 94.4%, 87.6%, 95.9%, 86.3%, 90.8%, respectively. Therefore, we consider biomarkers in combination with ultrasound features may improve the diagnostic performance in distinguishing malignant from benign ovarian tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 191
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasound Features Improve Diagnostic Performance of Ovarian Cancer Predictors in Distinguishing Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors
    Yong-ning Chen
    Fei Ma
    Ya-di Zhang
    Li Chen
    Chan-yuan Li
    Shi-peng Gong
    Current Medical Science, 2020, 40 : 184 - 191
  • [2] Comparison of glutaminase and cancer antigen 125 for distinguishing benign and malignant ovarian tumors
    Winarno, Gatot Nyarumenteng Adhipurnawan
    Effendi, Jusuf Sulaeman
    Harsono, Ali Budi
    Salima, Siti
    Darwizar, Bagja Dumas
    Sasotya, R. M. Sonny
    Rachmawati, Anita
    Mulyantari, Ayu Insafi
    Trianasari, Nurvita
    Handono, Budi
    CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2023, 16 (11): : 2144 - 2152
  • [3] Evaluation of the Diagnostic Value of the Ultrasound ADNEX Model for Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors
    Peng, Xiao-Shan
    Ma, Yue
    Wang, Ling-Ling
    Li, Hai-Xia
    Zheng, Xiu-Lan
    Liu, Ying
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 : 5665 - 5673
  • [4] Clinical and ultrasound features of benign, borderline, and malignant invasive mucinous ovarian tumors
    Pascual, A.
    Guerriero, S.
    Rams, N.
    Juez, L.
    Ajossa, S.
    Graupera, B.
    Hereter, L.
    Cappai, A.
    Pero, M.
    Perniciano, M.
    Errasti, T.
    Parra, J.
    Solis, M.
    Alcazar, J. L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 38 (03) : 382 - 386
  • [5] A biomarker panel for distinguishing between malignant and benign ovarian tumors
    Ueland, F.
    Zhang, Z.
    Crutcher, G.
    Fung, E.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 112 (02) : S98 - S99
  • [6] Diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers for distinguishing malignant and benign ovarian masses
    Eo, Wan Kyu
    Kim, Ki Hyung
    Park, Eun Joo
    Kim, Heung Yeol
    Kim, Hong-bae
    Koh, Suk Bong
    Namkung, Jeong
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 9 (07): : 1165 - 1172
  • [7] Ultrasound, macroscopic and histological features of malignant ovarian tumors
    Moro, Francesca
    Verdecchia, Valeria
    Romeo, Paola
    Ciccarone, Francesca
    Zannoni, Gian Franco
    Valentin, Lil
    Timmerman, Dirk
    Bourne, Tom
    Froyman, Wouter
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Testa, Antonia Carla
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 (01) : 150 - 151
  • [8] BORDERLINE OVARIAN TUMORS - ARE THEY BENIGN OR MALIGNANT?
    Lazarou, Anastasia
    Fotopoulou, Christina
    Coumbos, Alexandra
    Sehouli, Jalid
    Vasiljeva, Jekaterina
    Braicu, Ioana
    Burger, Heinz
    Kuehn, Wolfgang
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (10) : 6257 - 6257
  • [9] The ultrasound features of papillary projections in benign, borderline and malignant ovarian tumours
    Mitchell, Sian
    Abdelbar, Ahmed
    Mehra, Gautam
    Sayasneh, Ahmad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2024, 34 (SUPPL_1) : A410 - A410
  • [10] A Novel Classifier Based on Urinary Proteomics for Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors
    Ni, Maowei
    Zhou, Jie
    Zhu, Zhihui
    Yuan, Jingtao
    Gong, Wangang
    Zhu, Jianqing
    Zheng, Zhiguo
    Zhao, Huajun
    FRONTIERS IN CELL AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2021, 9