Survival Rate of Short, Locking Taper Implants with a Plateau Design: A 5-Year Retrospective Study

被引:15
|
作者
Demiralp, Kemal Ozgur [1 ]
Akbulut, Nihat [2 ]
Kursun, Sebnem [3 ]
Argun, Didem [4 ]
Bagis, Nilsun [5 ]
Orhan, Kaan [6 ]
机构
[1] Minist Hlth, Publ Hosp Agcy Turkey, TR-06520 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Fac Dent, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg Dept, TR-60150 Tokat, Turkey
[3] Minist Hlth, Bolu Oral & Dent Hlth Ctr, Div Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, TR-14300 Bolu, Turkey
[4] Special Clin Practice, TR-06490 Ankara, Turkey
[5] Ankara Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Periodontol, TR-06500 Ankara, Turkey
[6] Ankara Univ, Fac Dent, Dentomaxillofacial Radiol Dept, TR-06500 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
SINGLE-TOOTH; 6-MM-LONG IMPLANTS; PLACEMENT; SURFACE;
D O I
10.1155/2015/197451
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background. Short implants have become popular in the reconstruction of jaws, especially in cases with limited bone height. Shorter implants, those with locking tapers and plateau root shapes, tend to have longer survival times. We retrospectively investigated the cumulative survival rates of Bicon short implants (<8 mm) according to patient variables over a 5-year period. Materials and Methods. This study included 111 consecutively treated patients with 371 implants supporting fixed or removable prosthetics. Data were evaluated to acquire cumulative survival rates according to gender, age, tobacco use, surgical procedure, bone quality, and restoration type. Statistics were performed using chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and Kruskal Wallis H tests. Results. The survival rate was 97.3% with, on average, 22.8 months of follow-up. Patients older than 60 years had higher failure rate than the other age groups (P < 0.05). Placed region, age, and bone quality had adverse effects on survival rate in the <8 mm implant group with statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Conclusions. Approximately 23-month follow-up data indicate that short implants with locking tapers and plateau-type roots have comparable survival rates as other types of dental implants. However, due to limitations of study, these issues remain to be further investigated in future randomized controlled clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 5-YEAR SURVIVAL RATE IN URBAN PATIENTS WITH OVARIAN CARCINOMA
    RUSH, RW
    BENNETT, MB
    VADER, C
    SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1978, 54 (12): : 471 - 472
  • [33] A 5-year multicenter retrospective study on Motiva Ergonomix® breast implants: Minimizing complications and maximizing results
    Mariagrazia Moio
    Gisella Nele
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2023, 46 : 1099 - 1111
  • [34] A 5-year multicenter retrospective study on Motiva Ergonomix® breast implants: Minimizing complications and maximizing results
    Moio, Mariagrazia
    Nele, Gisella
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 46 (06) : 1099 - 1111
  • [35] Levonorgestrel capsule implants in the United States: A 5-year study
    Sivin, I
    Mishell, DR
    Darney, P
    Wan, LV
    Christ, M
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (03): : 337 - 344
  • [36] Immediately loaded zygomatic implants: a 5-year prospective study
    Davo, Ruben
    Malevez, Chantal
    Pons, Olivia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2013, 6 (01) : 39 - 47
  • [37] A 5-year prospective study of Astra single tooth implants
    Palmer, RM
    Palmer, PJ
    Smith, BJ
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2000, 11 (02) : 179 - 182
  • [38] Prosthetic complications of fixed dental prostheses supported by locking-taper implants: a retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 5 years
    Wen mo Gao
    Wei Geng
    Chen chen Luo
    BMC Oral Health, 21
  • [39] Prosthetic complications of fixed dental prostheses supported by locking-taper implants: a retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 5 years
    Gao, Wen Mo
    Geng, Wei
    Luo, Chen Chen
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [40] ACUTE EPIDIDYMITIS IN BOYS - A 5-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
    GISLASON, T
    NORONHA, RFX
    GREGORY, JG
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1980, 124 (04): : 533 - 534