Dominant role of the asymmetric ring current in producing the stormtime Dst

被引:265
|
作者
Liemohn, MW
Kozyra, JU
Thomsen, MF
Roeder, JL
Lu, G
Borovsky, JE
Cayton, TE
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Space Phys Res Lab, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[3] Aerospace Corp, El Segundo, CA 90245 USA
[4] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, High Altitude Observ, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2000JA000326
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Three storms are examined to determine the contribution to the Dst* index from the symmetric and asymmetric (partial) components of the ring current. The storms (September 24-25, 1998, October 18-19, 1998, and May 14-15, 1997) all have a similar solar wind trigger (an initial shock followed by a coronal mass ejection with southward interplanetary magnetic field) and placement in the solar cycle (rising phase). The near-Earth ion distribution function is simulated for each storm using a kinetic transport model. The use of a McIlwain magnetospheric electric field description improves the simulation results over the Volland-Stern field used previously. It is found that most of the main phase magnetic field depression is due to the asymmetric component of the ring current (greater than or equal to 80% at the Dst* minimum for the three storms). Note that this is a minimum asymmetric ring current contribution, because the closed-trajectory ions may also be spatially asymmetric. Ions in the partial ring current make one pass through the inner magnetosphere on open drift paths that intersect the dayside magnetopause. Changes in the density of the inner plasma sheet are transmitted directly along these open drift paths. For a steady convection field, an increase in the source population produces a decrease (more intense perturbation) in Dst*, while a decrease produces a Dst* recovery. As the storm recovery proceeds, a decrease in the electric field results in a conversion of open to closed drift paths, forming a trapped, symmetric ring current that dominates Dst*. The mostly H+ composition of the ring current for all three storms rules out the possibility of differential charge exchange being the cause of the fast and slow decay timescales, confirming that outflow is the main loss of ring current-generated Dst* during the early phase decay. The slow decay timescale in the late recovery, however, is dominated by charge exchange with the hydrogen geocorona. The symmetric-asymmetric ring current is also placed in the context of the solar wind and plasma sheet drivers.
引用
收藏
页码:10883 / 10904
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Study of Dst/ring current recovery times using the WINDMI model
    Patra, S.
    Spencer, E.
    Horton, W.
    Sojka, J.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2011, 116
  • [22] Geomagnetic storms, the Dst ring-current myth and lognormal distributions
    Campbell, W. H.
    Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 58 (10):
  • [23] ASYMMETRIC PROTON RING CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
    PARSIGNA.DR
    CHASE, RC
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1970, 51 (11): : 806 - &
  • [24] VIRIAL THEOREM FOR ASYMMETRIC RING CURRENT
    MAGUIRE, J
    CAROVILL.R
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1971, 52 (04): : 330 - &
  • [25] ASYMMETRIC RING CURRENT AT TWILIGHT LOCAL TIME
    LANGEL, RA
    SWEENEY, RE
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1971, 76 (19): : 4420 - +
  • [26] ASYMMETRIC RING CURRENT DURING MAGNETOSPHERIC SUBSTORMS
    CLAUER, CR
    MCPHERRON, RL
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1976, 57 (12): : 993 - 993
  • [27] SOME ASPECTS OF DYNAMICS OF ASYMMETRIC RING CURRENT
    BESPALOV, PA
    GRAFE, A
    DEMEKHOV, AG
    TRAKHTENGERTS, VY
    GEOMAGNETIZM I AERONOMIYA, 1990, 30 (05): : 740 - 746
  • [28] Formation of the storm-time ring current and the Dst field: Some recent topics
    Iyemori, T
    MAGNETOSPHERIC CURRENT SYSTEMS, 2000, 118 : 331 - 338
  • [29] Single particle simulation on the storm-time ring current formation and Dst variation
    Ebihara, Y
    Ejiri, M
    Nilsson, H
    SPACE WEATHER 2000, 2003, 31 (04): : 1051 - 1058