Thromboprophylaxis in Intramedullary Limb Lengthening Surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Iliadis, Alexios D. [1 ]
Timms, Anna [1 ]
Fugazzotto, Sharron [1 ]
Edel, Penina [1 ]
Britten, Simon [2 ]
Wright, Jonathan [1 ]
Goodier, David [1 ]
Calder, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp NHS Trust, Limb Reconstruct Unit, Stanmore, Middx, England
[2] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Limb Reconstruct Unit, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Complication; Cosmetic limb lengthening; Internal lengthening nail; Intramedullary lengthening; Limb lengthening; PRECICE; DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; ORTHOPEDIC-SURGERY; PREVENTION; ENOXAPARIN; METAANALYSIS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1505
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim:The use of intramedullary lengthening devices is becoming increasingly popular. There are limited data regarding the incidence of venous thromboembolism following intramedullary lengthening surgery and no reports or guidance for current practice on use of thromboprophylaxis. Following a case of post-operative deep vein thrombosis in our institution, we felt that it is important to assess best practice. We conducted a national survey to collect data that would describe current practice and help develop consensus for treatment. Materials and methods: We identified surgeons across the UK that perform adult intramedullary limb lengthening through the British Limb Reconstruction Society membership and a Precise Users database. Surgeons were contacted and asked to respond loan online survey. Responses to thromboprophylaxis regimes employed in their practice and cases of venous thromboembolism were collated. Results: 24 out of 54 surgeons identified responded with a total of 454 cases of adult intramedullary lengthening (352 femoral and 102 tibial nails) performed over a five year period (January 2015-January 2020).Only one case of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) following femoral lengthening was reported. There is wide variability in practice both in terms of thromboprophylaxis risk assessment, choice of medications and duration of treatment. The vast majority of surgeons (85%) felt that there was Insufficient evidence available to guide their practice. Conclusions: Intramedullary lengthening is a surgical treatment growing in popularity.There are limited data available to guide decision-making regarding aspects of treatment such as thromboprophylaxis. This is reflected in the wide variation in practice reported in this study. There are both a need and a desire to gather data that will allow us to come to a consensus and to guide safe practice. Clinical significance: Venous thromboembolism is a potential complication of lower limb lengthening surgery. We report on national incidence and current practices of thromboprophylaxis to allow for informed decision-making and help develop consensus for best practice.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 156
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Motorized, Telescopic, Intramedullary Lengthening Nails for Limb Length and Deformity Correction
    Dahl, Mark T.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 30 (03) : 189 - 206
  • [32] Lower limb lengthening: is there a difference in the lengthening index and infection rates of lengthening with external fixators, external fixators with intramedullary nails or intramedullary nailing alone? A systematic review of the literature
    Mark Brian Stephen Brewster
    Cyril Mauffrey
    Andrew C. Lewis
    Peter Hull
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2010, 20 : 103 - 108
  • [33] Lower limb lengthening: is there a difference in the lengthening index and infection rates of lengthening with external fixators, external fixators with intramedullary nails or intramedullary nailing alone? A systematic review of the literature
    Brewster, Mark Brian Stephen
    Mauffrey, Cyril
    Lewis, Andrew C.
    Hull, Peter
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2010, 20 (02): : 103 - 108
  • [34] Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Intramedullary Lengthening Nails vs. Alternative Techniques for Femoral Limb Lengthening
    Azimi, Amirali
    Herzenberg, John E.
    Roshdi Dizaji, Shayan
    McClure, Philip K.
    Tabatabaei, Fatemeh-sadat
    Azimi, Amir Farbod
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [35] Thromboprophylaxis in lower limb varicose vein surgery in Brazil
    Araujo Ribeiro, Alcides Jose
    Mendes-Pinto, Daniel
    Erzinger, Fabiano Luiz
    Alvim Fiorelli, Rossano Kepler
    Alvim Fiorelli, Stenio Karlos
    de Oliveira Ribeiro, Andrea Campos
    Marques, Marcos Areas
    JORNAL VASCULAR BRASILEIRO, 2022, 21
  • [36] Limb Lengthening by Implantable Limb Lengthening Devices
    Paley, Dror
    Harris, Matthew
    Debiparshad, Kevin
    Prince, Daniel
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 29 (02) : 72 - 85
  • [37] Femoral lengthening using the Precice intramedullary limb-lengthening system OUTCOME COMPARISON FOLLOWING ANTEGRADE AND RETROGRADE NAILS
    Calder, P. R.
    McKay, J. E.
    Timms, A. J.
    Roskrow, T.
    Fugazzotto, S.
    Edel, P.
    Goodier, W. D.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2019, 101B (09): : 1168 - 1176
  • [38] Treatment with fully implantable intramedullary distraction nails for limb lengthening-a paradigm shift
    Baumgart, Rainer
    Lenze, Ulrich
    ORTHOPADIE, 2023, 52 (09): : 699 - 709
  • [39] Bone Lengthening with a Motorized Intramedullary Nail in 34 Patients with Posttraumatic Limb Length Discrepancies
    Teulieres, Maxime
    Langlais, Tristan
    de Gauzy, Jerome Sales
    Rolfing, Jan Duedal
    Accadbled, Franck
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (11)
  • [40] Outpatient limb lengthening using magnetic intramedullary nails: A single Institution's experience
    Dubin, Jeremy A.
    Bains, Sandeep S.
    Moore, Mallory
    Assayag, Michael J.
    McClure, Phillip K.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 53 : 163 - 167